• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用hBayesDM软件包揭示强化学习和决策的神经计算机制。

Revealing Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Reinforcement Learning and Decision-Making With the hBayesDM Package.

作者信息

Ahn Woo-Young, Haines Nathaniel, Zhang Lei

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Institute for Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Comput Psychiatr. 2017 Oct 1;1:24-57. doi: 10.1162/CPSY_a_00002. eCollection 2017 Oct.

DOI:10.1162/CPSY_a_00002
PMID:29601060
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5869013/
Abstract

Reinforcement learning and decision-making (RLDM) provide a quantitative framework and computational theories with which we can disentangle psychiatric conditions into the basic dimensions of neurocognitive functioning. RLDM offer a novel approach to assessing and potentially diagnosing psychiatric patients, and there is growing enthusiasm for both RLDM and computational psychiatry among clinical researchers. Such a framework can also provide insights into the brain substrates of particular RLDM processes, as exemplified by model-based analysis of data from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or electroencephalography (EEG). However, researchers often find the approach too technical and have difficulty adopting it for their research. Thus, a critical need remains to develop a user-friendly tool for the wide dissemination of computational psychiatric methods. We introduce an R package called hBayesDM (hierarchical Bayesian modeling of Decision-Making tasks), which offers computational modeling of an array of RLDM tasks and social exchange games. The hBayesDM package offers state-of-the-art hierarchical Bayesian modeling, in which both individual and group parameters (i.e., posterior distributions) are estimated simultaneously in a mutually constraining fashion. At the same time, the package is extremely user-friendly: users can perform computational modeling, output visualization, and Bayesian model comparisons, each with a single line of coding. Users can also extract the trial-by-trial latent variables (e.g., prediction errors) required for model-based fMRI/EEG. With the hBayesDM package, we anticipate that anyone with minimal knowledge of programming can take advantage of cutting-edge computational-modeling approaches to investigate the underlying processes of and interactions between multiple decision-making (e.g., goal-directed, habitual, and Pavlovian) systems. In this way, we expect that the hBayesDM package will contribute to the dissemination of advanced modeling approaches and enable a wide range of researchers to easily perform computational psychiatric research within different populations.

摘要

强化学习与决策制定(RLDM)提供了一个定量框架和计算理论,借助它们我们可以将精神疾病分解为神经认知功能的基本维度。RLDM为评估和潜在诊断精神科患者提供了一种新方法,临床研究人员对RLDM和计算精神病学的热情与日俱增。这样一个框架还可以为特定RLDM过程的脑基质提供见解,功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)或脑电图(EEG)数据的基于模型分析就是例证。然而,研究人员常常觉得这种方法过于技术化,难以将其应用于自己的研究。因此,迫切需要开发一种用户友好型工具,以广泛传播计算精神病学方法。我们介绍一个名为hBayesDM(决策任务的分层贝叶斯建模)的R包,它提供了一系列RLDM任务和社会交换博弈的计算建模。hBayesDM包提供了最先进的分层贝叶斯建模,其中个体和组参数(即后验分布)以相互约束的方式同时进行估计。同时,该包极其用户友好:用户只需一行代码就能进行计算建模、输出可视化以及贝叶斯模型比较。用户还可以提取基于模型的fMRI/EEG所需的逐试验潜在变量(例如预测误差)。借助hBayesDM包,我们预计任何对编程稍有了解的人都能利用前沿的计算建模方法来研究多个决策制定(例如目标导向、习惯和巴甫洛夫式)系统之间的潜在过程和相互作用。通过这种方式,我们期望hBayesDM包将有助于先进建模方法的传播,并使众多研究人员能够轻松地在不同人群中开展计算精神病学研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/4450b28003c5/cpsy-01-24-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/fead3824cd4b/cpsy-01-24-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/3c5a5f65bc0c/cpsy-01-24-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/cb66dd1540a7/cpsy-01-24-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/25280431da3e/cpsy-01-24-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/66d21ec10dcc/cpsy-01-24-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/db14bf51fbe5/cpsy-01-24-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/4450b28003c5/cpsy-01-24-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/fead3824cd4b/cpsy-01-24-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/3c5a5f65bc0c/cpsy-01-24-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/cb66dd1540a7/cpsy-01-24-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/25280431da3e/cpsy-01-24-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/66d21ec10dcc/cpsy-01-24-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/db14bf51fbe5/cpsy-01-24-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/5869013/4450b28003c5/cpsy-01-24-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Revealing Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Reinforcement Learning and Decision-Making With the hBayesDM Package.使用hBayesDM软件包揭示强化学习和决策的神经计算机制。
Comput Psychiatr. 2017 Oct 1;1:24-57. doi: 10.1162/CPSY_a_00002. eCollection 2017 Oct.
2
Dimensional psychiatry: mental disorders as dysfunctions of basic learning mechanisms.维度精神病学:作为基本学习机制功能障碍的精神障碍
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2016 Aug;123(8):809-21. doi: 10.1007/s00702-016-1561-2. Epub 2016 May 4.
3
Reinforcement learning as an intermediate phenotype in psychosis? Deficits sensitive to illness stage but not associated with polygenic risk of schizophrenia in the general population.强化学习作为精神病的一种中间表型?缺陷对疾病阶段敏感,但与普通人群中精神分裂症的多基因风险无关。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Aug;222:389-396. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.04.022. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Using reinforcement learning models in social neuroscience: frameworks, pitfalls and suggestions of best practices.在社会神经科学中使用强化学习模型:框架、陷阱和最佳实践建议。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Jul 30;15(6):695-707. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa089.
5
Models of Dynamic Belief Updating in Psychosis-A Review Across Different Computational Approaches.精神病中动态信念更新模型——不同计算方法综述
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 12;13:814111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.814111. eCollection 2022.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Role of the medial prefrontal cortex in impaired decision making in juvenile attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.内侧前额叶皮质在青少年注意缺陷多动障碍中决策障碍的作用。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;71(10):1165-73. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1093.
8
Driven by Pain, Not Gain: Computational Approaches to Aversion-Related Decision Making in Psychiatry.受痛苦而非收益驱动:精神病学中与厌恶相关的决策的计算方法。
Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 15;87(4):359-367. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Simultaneous Hierarchical Bayesian Parameter Estimation for Reinforcement Learning and Drift Diffusion Models: a Tutorial and Links to Neural Data.强化学习和漂移扩散模型的同步分层贝叶斯参数估计:教程及与神经数据的链接
Comput Brain Behav. 2020 Dec;3(4):458-471. doi: 10.1007/s42113-020-00084-w. Epub 2020 May 26.
10
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.强化学习中的选择规则——漂移扩散模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1234-1251. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1199-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute isolation is associated with increased reward seeking and reward learning in human adolescents.急性隔离与人类青少年寻求奖励和奖励学习的增加有关。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Sep 5;3(1):135. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00306-6.
2
Cognitive Control Decision-Making Dynamics Across Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms in Youth.青少年内化和外化症状中的认知控制决策动态
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1007/s10802-025-01351-9.
3
Neurophysiological encoding of aversive prediction errors.厌恶预测误差的神经生理编码。

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Challenges and promises for translating computational tools into clinical practice.将计算工具转化为临床实践所面临的挑战与机遇。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Oct 1;11:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.001.
3
Reduction of Pavlovian Bias in Schizophrenia: Enhanced Effects in Clozapine-Administered Patients.减少精神分裂症中的巴甫洛夫偏差:氯氮平治疗患者的增强效应。
Pain. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003712.
4
A common alteration in effort-based decision-making in apathy, anhedonia, and late circadian rhythm.冷漠、快感缺乏和昼夜节律晚期基于努力的决策中的一种常见改变。
Elife. 2025 Jun 16;13:RP96803. doi: 10.7554/eLife.96803.
5
Dorsomedial and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions differentially impact social influence and temporal discounting.背内侧和腹内侧前额叶皮层损伤对社会影响和时间折扣有不同影响。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Apr 28;23(4):e3003079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003079. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Hippocampal perineuronal net degradation identifies prefrontal and striatal circuits involved in schizophrenia-like changes in marmosets.海马体神经元周围网络退化可识别参与狨猴精神分裂症样变化的前额叶和纹状体回路。
Sci Adv. 2025 Apr 18;11(16):eadu0975. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu0975.
7
Circadian photoreception influences loss aversion.昼夜节律光感受影响损失厌恶。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 16;15(1):13051. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97370-z.
8
Computational mechanisms underlying the impact of Pavlovian bias on instrumental learning in problematic social media users.巴甫洛夫偏差对问题社交媒体用户工具性学习影响背后的计算机制。
J Behav Addict. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00026.
9
The "Tetris effect": autistic and non-autistic people share an implicit drive for perceptual cohesion.“俄罗斯方块效应”:自闭症患者和非自闭症患者都有一种对感知连贯性的内在驱动力。
Mol Autism. 2025 Mar 26;16(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13229-025-00654-4.
10
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Enhances Probabilistic Learning.经皮迷走神经刺激增强概率学习。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Mar;62(3):e70037. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70037.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 4;11(4):e0152781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152781. eCollection 2016.
4
Utility of Machine-Learning Approaches to Identify Behavioral Markers for Substance Use Disorders: Impulsivity Dimensions as Predictors of Current Cocaine Dependence.机器学习方法在识别物质使用障碍行为标志物中的效用:冲动性维度作为当前可卡因依赖的预测指标
Front Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 10;7:34. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00034. eCollection 2016.
5
Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications.计算精神病学作为从神经科学通向临床应用的桥梁。
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Mar;19(3):404-13. doi: 10.1038/nn.4238.
6
Machine-learning identifies substance-specific behavioral markers for opiate and stimulant dependence.机器学习识别出阿片类药物和兴奋剂依赖的特定物质行为标志物。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Apr 1;161:247-57. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
7
Charting the landscape of priority problems in psychiatry, part 1: classification and diagnosis.绘制精神病学中优先问题的全貌,第1部分:分类与诊断。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;3(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00361-2. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
8
Charting the landscape of priority problems in psychiatry, part 2: pathogenesis and aetiology.描绘精神病学中优先问题的全貌,第2部分:发病机制与病因学
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;3(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00360-0. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
9
Hierarchical Bayesian estimation and hypothesis testing for delay discounting tasks.用于延迟折扣任务的分层贝叶斯估计与假设检验
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1608-1620. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0672-2.
10
Transcranial Stimulation over Frontopolar Cortex Elucidates the Choice Attributes and Neural Mechanisms Used to Resolve Exploration-Exploitation Trade-Offs.经颅刺激额极皮层揭示了用于解决探索-利用权衡的选择属性和神经机制。
J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 28;35(43):14544-56. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2322-15.2015.