Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; University of Toronto; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto; and University of Waterloo, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada.
J Oncol Pract. 2018 May;14(5):e280-e294. doi: 10.1200/JOP.17.00058. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
The purpose of this study was to determine if clinical benefits of novel anticancer drugs, measured by the ASCO Value Framework and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale, have increased over time in parallel with increasing costs.
Anticancer drugs from phase III randomized controlled trials cited for clinical efficacy evidence in drug approvals between January 2006 to December 2015 were identified and scored using both frameworks. For each drug, the monthly price and incremental anticancer drug costs were calculated. Relationships between cost and year of approval were examined using generalized linear regressions models. Ordinary least square models were used to evaluate relationships between ASCO and ESMO scores and year of approval. Spearman correlation coefficients between costs and clinical benefit scores were calculated.
In total, 42 randomized controlled trials were included. Both monthly prices and incremental anticancer drug costs were significantly associated with year of approval and showed an average annual increase of 9% and 21%, respectively. The predicted mean incremental anticancer drug cost increased from $30,447 in 2006 to $161,141 in 2015 (greater than five-fold increase). Both ASCO and ESMO scores were not statistically associated with year of approval or correlated with monthly prices or incremental anticancer drug costs.
Over the past decade, costs of novel oncology drugs have increased, while clinical benefits of these medications have not experienced a proportional positive change. The incremental anticancer drug costs have increased at a much greater rate than monthly prices, indicating that the increase in anticancer drug costs may be higher than commonly reported.
本研究旨在确定新型抗癌药物的临床获益是否随着成本的增加而与时间同步增加,其衡量标准为美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)价值框架和欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)临床获益量表。
确定了 2006 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间,在药物批准中引用的用于临床疗效证据的 III 期随机对照试验中的抗癌药物,并使用这两个框架进行评分。对于每种药物,计算了每月价格和增量抗癌药物成本。使用广义线性回归模型检查成本与批准年份之间的关系。使用普通最小二乘法模型评估 ASCO 和 ESMO 评分与批准年份之间的关系。计算成本与临床获益评分之间的 Spearman 相关系数。
共纳入 42 项随机对照试验。每月价格和增量抗癌药物成本均与批准年份显著相关,分别呈每年平均增长 9%和 21%。预测的平均增量抗癌药物成本从 2006 年的 30447 美元增加到 2015 年的 161141 美元(增长超过五倍)。ASCO 和 ESMO 评分均与批准年份无统计学关联,也与每月价格或增量抗癌药物成本不相关。
在过去十年中,新型肿瘤药物的成本有所增加,而这些药物的临床获益并未经历相应的积极变化。增量抗癌药物成本的增长速度远高于每月价格,表明抗癌药物成本的增长可能高于普遍报道的水平。