J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jun;48(6):476-490. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7562. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
Study Design Literature review with meta-analysis. Background The McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT), a classification-based system, was designed to classify patients into homogeneous subgroups to direct treatment. Objectives To examine the effectiveness of MDT for improving pain and disability in patients with either acute (less than 12 weeks in duration) or chronic (greater than 12 weeks in duration) low back pain (LBP). Methods Randomized controlled trials examining MDT in patients with LBP were identified from 6 databases. Independent investigators assessed the studies for exclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval were calculated to compare the effects of MDT to those of other interventions in patients with acute or chronic LBP. Results Of the 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 11 yielded valid data for analysis. In patients with acute LBP, there was no significant difference in pain resolution (P = .11) and disability (P = .61) between MDT and other interventions. In patients with chronic LBP, there was a significant difference in disability (SMD, -0.45), with results favoring MDT compared to exercise alone. There were no significant differences between MDT and manual therapy plus exercise (P>.05) for pain and disability outcomes. Conclusion There is moderate- to high-quality evidence that MDT is not superior to other rehabilitation interventions for reducing pain and disability in patients with acute LBP. In patients with chronic LBP, there is moderate- to high-quality evidence that MDT is superior to other rehabilitation interventions for reducing pain and disability; however, this depends on the type of intervention being compared to MDT. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 1a. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(6):476-490. Epub 30 Mar 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7562.
文献回顾与荟萃分析。
麦肯锡机械诊断与治疗方法(MDT)是一种基于分类的系统,旨在将患者分为同质亚组以指导治疗。
研究 MDT 对急性(持续时间少于 12 周)和慢性(持续时间超过 12 周)腰痛患者疼痛和残疾的改善效果。
从 6 个数据库中确定了研究 MDT 治疗腰痛患者的随机对照试验。独立研究者评估研究排除、提取数据和评估偏倚风险。计算标准化均数差(SMD)和 95%置信区间,以比较 MDT 与其他干预措施对急性或慢性腰痛患者的疗效。
在符合纳入标准的 17 项研究中,有 11 项研究得出了有效的数据分析结果。在急性腰痛患者中,MDT 与其他干预措施在疼痛缓解(P =.11)和残疾(P =.61)方面无显著差异。在慢性腰痛患者中,残疾(SMD,-0.45)方面存在显著差异,结果表明 MDT 优于单独运动疗法。MDT 与手法治疗加运动疗法(P>.05)在疼痛和残疾结局方面无显著差异。
有中等到高质量证据表明,MDT 并不优于其他康复干预措施,无法减轻急性腰痛患者的疼痛和残疾。在慢性腰痛患者中,有中等到高质量证据表明,MDT 优于其他康复干预措施,可减轻疼痛和残疾;然而,这取决于与 MDT 相比的干预类型。
治疗,1a 级。美国骨科物理治疗杂志 2018;48(6):476-490。2018 年 3 月 30 日在线发表。doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7562。