• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同混合技术及消毒对聚醚印模材料微生物定植的效果评估:一项对比研究

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Mixing Techniques and Disinfection on Microbial Colonization of Polyether Impression Materials: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Singla Youginder, Pachar Renu B, Poriya Sangeeta, Mishra Aalok, Sharma Rajni, Garg Anshu

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental College & Research Centre, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India, Phone: +919814192252, e-mail:

Department of Prosthodontics, Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental College & Research Centre, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Mar 1;19(3):296-300.

PMID:29603702
Abstract

AIM

This study aims to determine the role of mixing techniques of polyether impression materials and efficacy of disinfection on microbial colonization of these impression materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Polyether impression material was mixed using two methods: First by hand mixing (group I) and second using an automixer (group II) with a total of 100 samples. Four microbial strains were studied, which included Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans. After incubation, the bacterial colonies were counted, and then, disinfectant solution was applied. The effect of disinfection solution was evaluated for each specimen.

RESULTS

The surface of polyether impression materials mixed with an automixer has less number of voids and overall a smoother surface as compared with the hand-mixed ones. On comparing the disinfection procedures, i.e., specimens without any disinfection and specimens after disinfection, statistically highly significant difference was seen between all the groups.

CONCLUSION

We can conclude that impression mixing procedures are important in determining the surface characteristics of the impression and ultimately the colonization of bacteria and also determine the importance of disinfection on microbial colonization.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study emphasises the deleterious role of nosocomial infections and specific measures that should be taken regarding the prevention of such diseases. Dental impressions are proved to be a source of such infections and may lead to transmission of such diseases. Thus, proper measures should be taken right from the first step of impression taking to minimizing and preventing such kind of contaminations in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定聚醚印模材料的混合技术的作用以及消毒对这些印模材料微生物定植的效果。

材料与方法

聚醚印模材料采用两种方法混合:第一种是手工混合(第一组),第二种是使用自动混合器(第二组),共100个样本。研究了四种微生物菌株,包括大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和白色念珠菌。培养后,对细菌菌落进行计数,然后应用消毒溶液。对每个样本评估消毒溶液的效果。

结果

与手工混合的聚醚印模材料相比,使用自动混合器混合的聚醚印模材料表面孔隙较少,总体表面更光滑。在比较消毒程序,即未进行任何消毒的样本和消毒后的样本时,所有组之间在统计学上存在高度显著差异。

结论

我们可以得出结论,印模混合程序对于确定印模的表面特性以及最终细菌的定植很重要,并且还确定了消毒对微生物定植的重要性。

临床意义

本研究强调了医院感染的有害作用以及应采取的预防此类疾病的具体措施。牙印模被证明是此类感染的一个来源,可能导致此类疾病的传播。因此,从取印模的第一步开始就应采取适当措施,以在临床实践中尽量减少和预防此类污染。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Mixing Techniques and Disinfection on Microbial Colonization of Polyether Impression Materials: A Comparative Study.不同混合技术及消毒对聚醚印模材料微生物定植的效果评估:一项对比研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Mar 1;19(3):296-300.
2
Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material.混合技术对聚醚印模材料细菌附着及消毒时间的影响
Eur J Dent. 2013 Sep;7(Suppl 1):S054-S059. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.119074.
3
Disinfection of bacterially contaminated hydrophilic PVS impression materials.细菌污染亲水型聚硅氧烷印模材料的消毒。
J Prosthodont. 2012 Jan;21(1):16-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00788.x. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
4
Resistance to disinfection of a polymicrobial association contaminating the surface of elastomeric dental impressions.污染弹性体牙科印模表面的多种微生物联合体的消毒抗性
New Microbiol. 2009 Apr;32(2):167-72.
5
Disinfectant Efficacy of 0.525% Sodium Hypochlorite and Epimax on Alginate Impression Material.0.525%次氯酸钠和爱必肤对藻酸盐印模材料的消毒效果
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):113-116. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2222.
6
Disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with chlorinated compounds.用含氯化合物对不可逆水胶体印模材料进行消毒。
SADJ. 2009 Jun;64(5):208, 210-2.
7
Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials.混合技术对印模材料表面特性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 May;79(5):495-502. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70168-4.
8
Influence of disinfection with peracetic acid and hypochlorite in dimensional alterations of casts obtained from addition silicone and polyether impressions.过氧乙酸和次氯酸盐消毒对由加成型硅橡胶和聚醚印模制取的铸型尺寸变化的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Nov 1;14(6):1100-5.
9
Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.4种消毒剂对藻酸盐、聚醚和聚乙烯基硅氧烷印模材料的抗菌作用。
Int J Prosthodont. 2007 May-Jun;20(3):299-307.
10
The disinfection of impression materials by using microwave irradiation and hydrogen peroxide.使用微波辐射和过氧化氢对印模材料进行消毒。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):981-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.017. Epub 2014 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Disinfection Procedures and Their Effect on the Microorganism Colonization of Dental Impression Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.消毒程序及其对牙科印模材料微生物定植的影响:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;9(3):123. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9030123.
2
3D Digital Impression Systems Compared with Traditional Techniques in Dentistry: A Recent Data Systematic Review.牙科中3D数字印模系统与传统技术的比较:近期数据系统评价
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 23;13(8):1982. doi: 10.3390/ma13081982.