Boyers S P, Lavy G, Russell J B, DeCherney A H
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.
Fertil Steril. 1987 Dec;48(6):969-74. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59593-4.
This study compares the in vitro fertilization and cleavage rates of paired first- and last-recovered preovulatory human oocytes that were exposed to a 100% CO2 pneumoperitoneum and general anesthesia. In 305 consecutive cycles of laparoscopy, 1741 oocytes (5.7/cycle) were recovered. The exact time of aspiration (T) was recorded for each oocyte. The time interval (T1 to T2) between recovery of first and last oocytes ranged from 0 to 38 minutes and represented differences in the exposure time of first and last oocytes to the CO2 pneumoperitoneum and to general anesthesia. For all cycles (n = 305) without regard for T1 to T2, last-recovered oocytes fertilized less often than first-recovered eggs (P = 0.06; McNemar's test). When T1 to T2 was short (less than or equal to 5 minutes), first- and last-recovered oocytes fertilized at comparable rates (70.8% and 74.0%). When only cycles with T1 to T2 greater than 5 minutes were considered (n = 209), the difference in fertilization rates between first and last oocytes (68.5% versus 56.4%) was highly significant (P less than 0.01; McNemar's test). Pairing negated differences due to patient, cycle, or semen variables and first- and last-recovered oocytes had comparable maturity scores (4.0 +/- 0.5 versus 4.3 +/- 0.8). There were no significant differences in cleavage rates for first- and last-recovered oocytes that fertilized, regardless of the exposure interval (T1 to T2). We conclude that exposure to a 100% CO2 pneumoperitoneum and/or general anesthesia may adversely affect oocyte quality.