Indirect Calorimetry and Body Composition Clinic of the Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of General Intensive Care and Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nutrition. 2018 Jul-Aug;51-52:60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
Patients with head and neck cancer have changes in body composition and resting energy expenditure (REE) related to significant inflammatory processes. We investigated REE and body composition in a population of patients with head and neck cancer, comparing the measured REE with predicted energy expenditure and deriving an equation of anthropometric values and body composition.
This retrospective, observational, descriptive study of a single center included patients with head and neck cancer. We evaluated nutritional status by body mass index (BMI) and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), body composition by electric bioimpedance, and REE by indirect calorimetry (IC).
We included 140 patients, most of whom were men (80.7%), 60 y or older (58.6%), and had advanced disease (77.9%). Most were malnourished by BMI standards (77.9%) and severely malnourished according to the PG-SGA (49.3%), with a fat-free mass below the ideal values (82.9%) associated with sarcopenia (92.1%). Hypermetabolism was 57%. When comparing REE with the Harris-Benedict formula, we found the agreement limits from -546 613 to 240 708, the mean difference was -152 953 (95% confidence interval [CI], -185 844 to -120 062) and Pitman's variance test was r = -0.294 (P = 0.001). When we included the activity factor and the thermogenesis factor in REE and compared with Harris-Benedict, we found the agreement limits from -764.423 to 337.087, a mean difference of -213.668 (95% CI -259.684 to -167.652), and the Pitman's variance text at r = -0.292 (P = 0.001).
Predictive equations, generally recommended by guidelines, are imprecise when compared with IC measures. Therefore, we suggest a new predictive equation.
头颈部癌症患者存在与严重炎症过程相关的身体成分和静息能量消耗(REE)改变。我们调查了头颈部癌症患者人群的 REE 和身体成分,将测量的 REE 与预测的能量消耗进行比较,并得出了一个基于人体测量值和身体成分的方程。
这是一项回顾性、观察性、单中心描述性研究,纳入了头颈部癌症患者。我们通过体重指数(BMI)和患者生成的主观整体评估(PG-SGA)评估营养状况,通过电阻抗法评估身体成分,通过间接热量法(IC)评估 REE。
我们纳入了 140 名患者,其中大多数为男性(80.7%),年龄 60 岁或以上(58.6%),且疾病处于晚期(77.9%)。大多数患者根据 BMI 标准存在营养不良(77.9%),根据 PG-SGA 存在严重营养不良(49.3%),去脂体重低于理想值(82.9%),并伴有肌肉减少症(92.1%)。高代谢率为 57%。当将 REE 与 Harris-Benedict 公式进行比较时,我们发现从-546 613 到 240 708 的协议限,平均差异为-152 953(95%置信区间[CI]:-185 844 至-120 062),Pitman 方差检验 r=-0.294(P=0.001)。当我们将活动因素和产热因素纳入 REE 并与 Harris-Benedict 公式进行比较时,我们发现从-764.423 到 337.087 的协议限,平均差异为-213.668(95%CI:-259.684 至-167.652),Pitman 方差检验 r=-0.292(P=0.001)。
与 IC 测量相比,指南通常推荐的预测方程并不精确。因此,我们建议使用一个新的预测方程。