Kelly Michael P, Eliasberg Claire D, Riley Max S, Ajiboye Remi M, SooHoo Nelson F
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8233, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1432-1439. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5570-8. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
The aim of this study was to analyze rates of perioperative complications and subsequent cervical surgeries in patients treated for cervical degenerative disc disease with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and those treated with artificial cervical disc arthroplasty (ACDA) for up to 5-year follow-up.
California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development discharge database was analyzed for patients aged 18-65 years undergoing single-level ACDF or ACDA between 2003 and 2010. Medical comorbidities were identified with CMS-Condition Categories. Readmissions for short-term complications of the procedure were identified and rates of subsequent cervical surgeries were calculated at 90-day and 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up. Multivariate regression modeling was used to identify associations with complications and subsequent cervical surgeries correcting for patient and provider characteristics.
A total of 52,395 eligible cases were identified: 50,926 ACDF and 1469 ACDA. Readmission was less common in the ACDA group (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48-1.0, p = 0.048). Subsequent cervical spine surgery was more common in the ACDF group in the immediate perioperative period (within 90 days of surgery) (ACDF 3.35% vs. ACDA 2.04%, OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.92, p = 0.015). At 1-, 3-, and 5-year postoperatively, rates of subsequent cervical surgeries were similar between the two cohorts.
We found no protective benefit for ACDA versus ACDF for single-level disease at up to 5-year follow-up in the largest cohort of patients examined to date. Early complications were rare in both cohorts stressing the value of large cohort studies to study risk factors for rare events. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
本研究旨在分析接受颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)和人工颈椎间盘置换术(ACDA)治疗的颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病患者的围手术期并发症发生率及随后的颈椎手术情况,随访时间长达5年。
分析加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与发展办公室出院数据库中2003年至2010年间接受单节段ACDF或ACDA手术的18至65岁患者。通过CMS病情分类确定医疗合并症。确定该手术短期并发症的再入院情况,并计算90天及1年、3年和5年随访时随后颈椎手术的发生率。采用多变量回归模型确定与并发症及随后颈椎手术相关的因素,并对患者和医疗服务提供者的特征进行校正。
共确定52395例符合条件的病例:50926例ACDF和1469例ACDA。ACDA组再入院情况较少见(比值比:0.69,95%可信区间:0.48 - 1.0,p = 0.048)。在围手术期即刻(手术90天内),ACDF组随后颈椎手术更常见(ACDF为3.35%,ACDA为2.04%,比值比:0.63,95%可信区间:0.44 - 0.92,p = 0.015)。术后1年、3年和5年,两组随后颈椎手术的发生率相似。
在迄今为止研究的最大患者队列中,随访长达5年时,我们发现单节段疾病采用ACDA对比ACDF并无保护优势。两组早期并发症均少见,强调了大型队列研究对于研究罕见事件危险因素的价值。这些幻灯片可在电子补充材料中获取。