多农药残留量测定茶中的高效液相色谱-高分辨率质谱法:轨道阱和飞行时间质谱分析器的比较。
Multiresidue determination of pesticides in tea by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry: Comparison between Orbitrap and time-of-flight mass analyzers.
机构信息
Division of Foods, National Institute of Health Sciences, Tonomachi 3-25-26, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 210-9501, Japan.
Thermo Fisher Scientific, C Bldg. 3-9 Moriya-cho, Kanagawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 221-0022, Japan.
出版信息
Food Chem. 2018 Aug 1;256:140-148. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.123. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
Liquid chromatography (LC)-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (MS) and LC-time-of-flight (TOF) MS operating in full scan mode at a mass resolution of 140,000 (m/z 200) and 30,000 (m/z 556), respectively, were compared for quantification of pesticide residues in tea. Both methods were validated for 146 pesticides at spike levels of 0.1 and 0.01 mg/kg and compared in terms of recovery, intra- and inter-day precisions, selectivity, linearity, and matrix effect. The results of both analyses were comparable, and recovery and intra- and inter-day precisions were within the acceptable ranges for most pesticides. LC-Orbitrap MS was slightly superior to LC-TOF MS in terms of sensitivity and selectivity due to its higher resolution. However, even using high-resolution LC-Orbitrap MS with a narrow mass window of ±3 ppm, interference by coeluting matrix components was observed, indicating that full scan data are insufficient for unequivocal identification, and additional information such as fragment ions is necessary.
液相色谱(LC)-轨道阱质谱(MS)和 LC-飞行时间(TOF)MS 分别在全扫描模式下以质量分辨率 140,000(m/z 200)和 30,000(m/z 556)运行,用于定量茶叶中的农药残留。两种方法均在 0.1 和 0.01mg/kg 的加标水平下进行了验证,并在回收率、日内和日间精密度、选择性、线性和基质效应方面进行了比较。两种分析的结果相当,大多数农药的回收率和日内及日间精密度均在可接受范围内。LC-轨道阱 MS 由于其更高的分辨率,在灵敏度和选择性方面略优于 LC-TOF MS。然而,即使使用具有 ±3 ppm 窄质量窗口的高分辨率 LC-轨道阱 MS,也观察到共洗脱基质成分的干扰,这表明全扫描数据不足以进行明确的鉴定,需要额外的信息,如碎片离子。