Berry Meredith S, Friedel Jonathan E, DeHart William B, Mahamane Salif, Jordan Kerry E, Odum Amy L
Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Department of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
Psychol Rec. 2017 Jun;67(2):137-148. doi: 10.1007/s40732-017-0233-4. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
The detrimental health effects of exposure to air pollution are well established. Fostering behavioral change concerning air quality may be challenging because the detrimental health effects of exposure to air pollution are delayed. Delay discounting, a measure of impulsive choice, encapsulates this process of choosing between the immediate conveniences of behaviors that increase pollution and the delayed consequences of prolonged exposure to poor air quality. In Experiment 1, participants completed a series of delay-discounting tasks for air quality and money. We found that participants discounted delayed air quality more than money. In Experiment 2, we investigated whether the common finding that large amounts of money are discounted less steeply than small amounts of money generalized to larger and smaller improvements in air quality. Participants discounted larger improvements in air quality less steeply than smaller improvements, indicating that the discounting of air quality shares a similar process as the discounting of money. Our results indicate that the discounting of delayed money is strongly related to the discounting of delayed air quality and that similar mechanisms may be involved in the discounting of these qualitatively different outcomes. These data are also the first to demonstrate the malleability of delay discounting of air quality, and provide important public health implications for decreasing delay discounting of air quality.
暴露于空气污染对健康的有害影响已得到充分证实。促进空气质量方面的行为改变可能具有挑战性,因为暴露于空气污染对健康的有害影响具有延迟性。延迟折扣是一种冲动选择的衡量方式,它概括了在增加污染行为的即时便利与长期暴露于恶劣空气质量的延迟后果之间进行选择的过程。在实验1中,参与者完成了一系列关于空气质量和金钱的延迟折扣任务。我们发现,参与者对延迟空气质量的折扣高于对金钱的折扣。在实验2中,我们研究了大量金钱的折扣比少量金钱的折扣更平缓这一常见发现是否适用于空气质量的较大和较小改善。参与者对空气质量较大改善的折扣比对较小改善的折扣更平缓,这表明空气质量的折扣与金钱的折扣有相似的过程。我们的结果表明,延迟金钱的折扣与延迟空气质量的折扣密切相关,并且在对这些性质不同的结果进行折扣时可能涉及类似的机制。这些数据也是首次证明空气质量延迟折扣的可塑性,并为降低空气质量延迟折扣提供了重要的公共卫生意义。