Berry Meredith S, Repke Meredith A, Metcalf Alexander L, Jordan Kerry E
Human Behavioral Pharmacology and Decision-Making Laboratory, Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 14;11:1682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01682. eCollection 2020.
Research within psychology and other disciplines has shown that exposure to natural environments holds extensive physiological and psychological benefits. Adding to the health and cognitive benefits of natural environments, evidence suggests that exposure to nature also promotes healthy human decision-making. Unhealthy decision-making (e.g., smoking, non-medical prescription opioid misuse) and disorders associated with lack of impulse control [e.g., tobacco use, opioid use disorder (OUD)], contribute to millions of preventable deaths annually (i.e., 6 million people die each year of tobacco-related illness worldwide, deaths from opioids from 2002 to 2017 have more than quadrupled in the United States alone). Impulsive and unhealthy decision-making also contributes to many pressing environmental issues such as climate change. We recently demonstrated a causal link between visual exposure to nature (e.g., forests) and improved self-control (i.e., decreased impulsivity) in a laboratory setting, as well as the extent to which nearby nature and green space exposure improves self-control and health decisions in daily life outside of the experimental laboratory. Determining the benefits of nearby nature for self-controlled decision-making holds theoretical and applied implications for the design of our surrounding environments. In this article, we synergize the overarching results of recent research endeavors in three domains including the effects of nature exposure on (1) general health-related decision-making, (2) health and decision-making relevant for application to addiction related processes (e.g., OUD), and (3) environmentally relevant decision-making. We also discuss key future directions and conclusions.
心理学及其他学科的研究表明,接触自然环境对生理和心理具有广泛益处。除了自然环境对健康和认知的益处外,有证据表明接触自然还能促进人类做出健康的决策。不健康的决策(如吸烟、非医疗用途的处方阿片类药物滥用)以及与缺乏冲动控制相关的疾病(如烟草使用、阿片类药物使用障碍),每年导致数百万可预防的死亡(即全球每年有600万人死于与烟草相关的疾病,仅在美国,2002年至2017年阿片类药物导致的死亡人数就增加了四倍多)。冲动和不健康的决策还导致了许多紧迫的环境问题,如气候变化。我们最近在实验室环境中证明了视觉接触自然(如森林)与自我控制能力提升(即冲动性降低)之间的因果关系,以及在实验室外的日常生活中,接触附近的自然和绿地能在多大程度上改善自我控制和健康决策。确定附近自然环境对自我控制决策的益处,对我们周围环境的设计具有理论和实际意义。在本文中,我们整合了最近在三个领域的研究总体结果,包括自然接触对(1)一般健康相关决策、(2)与成瘾相关过程(如阿片类药物使用障碍)应用相关的健康和决策、以及(3)与环境相关决策的影响。我们还讨论了未来的关键方向和结论。