Suppr超能文献

人类牙齿和颞骨岩部中的古代病原体DNA。

Ancient pathogen DNA in human teeth and petrous bones.

作者信息

Margaryan Ashot, Hansen Henrik B, Rasmussen Simon, Sikora Martin, Moiseyev Vyacheslav, Khoklov Alexandr, Epimakhov Andrey, Yepiskoposyan Levon, Kriiska Aivar, Varul Liivi, Saag Lehti, Lynnerup Niels, Willerslev Eske, Allentoft Morten E

机构信息

Centre for GeoGenetics Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.

Institute of Molecular Biology National Academy of Sciences Yerevan Armenia.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2018 Feb 26;8(6):3534-3542. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3924. eCollection 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Recent ancient DNA (aDNA) studies of human pathogens have provided invaluable insights into their evolutionary history and prevalence in space and time. Most of these studies were based on DNA extracted from teeth or postcranial bones. In contrast, no pathogen DNA has been reported from the petrous bone which has become the most desired skeletal element in ancient DNA research due to its high endogenous DNA content. To compare the potential for pathogenic aDNA retrieval from teeth and petrous bones, we sampled these elements from five ancient skeletons, previously shown to be carrying . Based on shotgun sequencing data, four of these five plague victims showed clearly detectable levels of DNA in the teeth, whereas all the petrous bones failed to produce DNA above baseline levels. A broader comparative metagenomic analysis of teeth and petrous bones from 10 historical skeletons corroborated these results, showing a much higher microbial diversity in teeth than petrous bones, including pathogenic and oral microbial taxa. Our results imply that although petrous bones are highly valuable for ancient genomic analyses as an excellent source of endogenous DNA, the metagenomic potential of these dense skeletal elements is highly limited. This trade-off must be considered when designing the sampling strategy for an aDNA project.

摘要

近期对人类病原体的古代DNA(aDNA)研究为其进化历史以及在时空上的流行情况提供了宝贵的见解。这些研究大多基于从牙齿或颅后骨骼中提取的DNA。相比之下,尚未有从颞骨中获取病原体DNA的报道,而颞骨因其高内源性DNA含量已成为古代DNA研究中最理想的骨骼元素。为了比较从牙齿和颞骨中获取致病aDNA的潜力,我们从五个古代骨架中采集了这些部位的样本,这些骨架先前已被证明携带……基于鸟枪法测序数据,这五名鼠疫受害者中有四名在牙齿中显示出明显可检测到的……DNA水平,而所有颞骨均未产生高于基线水平的……DNA。对来自10具历史骨架的牙齿和颞骨进行的更广泛的比较宏基因组分析证实了这些结果,表明牙齿中的微生物多样性远高于颞骨,包括致病微生物类群和口腔微生物类群。我们的结果表明,尽管颞骨作为内源性DNA的优质来源,对古代基因组分析具有很高的价值,但其作为致密骨骼元素的宏基因组潜力非常有限。在设计aDNA项目的采样策略时,必须考虑这种权衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/786d/5869295/4e3412c7e381/ECE3-8-3534-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验