• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低速率的差别强化差异性地降低了时间精度。

Differential reinforcement of low rates differentially decreased timing precision.

作者信息

Eckard Matthew L, Kyonka Elizabeth G E

机构信息

West Virginia University, United States.

Psychology and Behavioural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2018 Jun;151:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2018.02.022
PMID:29608943
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5963708/
Abstract

Timing processes have been implicated as potential mechanisms that underlie self-controlled choice. To investigate the impact of an intervention that has been shown to increase self-controlled choice on timing processes, accuracy and precision of temporal discrimination were assessed in an 18-s peak procedure (18-s fixed interval trials; 54-s peak trials). During an intervention phase, mice in three treatment groups experienced differential reinforcement of low rate (DRL) schedules of reinforcement of 27 s, 18 s, or 9 s. A fourth group received continued exposure to the peak procedure. After the DRL intervention, timing was reassessed using the peak procedure. In contrast to previous reports, the DRL intervention resulted in less precise timing as indicated by increased peak spread and disrupted single-trial measures of temporal control. These effects were only detected just after the DRL intervention suggesting a transient effect of DRL exposure on timing. The increase in peak spread in the present experiment suggests delay exposure via DRL schedules may produce a "dose-dependent" effect on temporal discrimination, which may also increase self-controlled choice.

摘要

计时过程被认为是自我控制选择背后的潜在机制。为了研究一种已被证明能增加自我控制选择的干预措施对计时过程的影响,在一个18秒峰值程序(18秒固定间隔试验;54秒峰值试验)中评估了时间辨别力的准确性和精确性。在干预阶段,三个治疗组的小鼠经历了27秒、18秒或9秒的低速率强化(DRL)强化程序。第四组继续接受峰值程序。DRL干预后,使用峰值程序重新评估计时。与之前的报告相反,DRL干预导致计时精度降低,表现为峰值扩散增加和时间控制的单次试验测量受到干扰。这些效应仅在DRL干预后立即检测到,表明DRL暴露对计时有短暂影响。本实验中峰值扩散的增加表明,通过DRL程序的延迟暴露可能对时间辨别产生“剂量依赖性”效应,这也可能增加自我控制选择。

相似文献

1
Differential reinforcement of low rates differentially decreased timing precision.低速率的差别强化差异性地降低了时间精度。
Behav Processes. 2018 Jun;151:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
2
Timing and space usage are disrupted by amphetamine in rats maintained on DRL 24-s and DRL 72-s schedules of reinforcement.在按24秒和72秒固定比率强化程序维持的大鼠中,苯丙胺会扰乱其时间和空间利用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Jun;204(2):213-25. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1451-x. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
3
Neural basis of operant behaviors maintained on the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) schedule in rodents.啮齿类动物在差频强化(DRL)程序上维持操作性行为的神经基础。
Brain Res Bull. 2022 Jul;185:1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
4
A laboratory comparison of two variations of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate procedures.两种差异式低反应率程序变异体的实验室比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Summer;47(2):314-24. doi: 10.1002/jaba.114. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
5
Interval timing relative to response inhibition in the differential reinforcement of low-rate responding in normally developing young adults.正常发育的年轻成年人在低频反应中进行区分性强化时,反应抑制的间隔计时。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 24;13(1):11977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39160-z.
6
Dopamine receptor antagonists reverse amphetamine-induced behavioral alteration on a differential reinforcement for low-rate (DRL) operant task in the rat.多巴胺受体拮抗剂可逆转苯丙胺对大鼠低频率差别强化操作性任务所诱导的行为改变。
Chin J Physiol. 2007 Apr 30;50(2):77-88.
7
Effects of ketamine optical isomers, fluoxetine and naloxone on timing in differential reinforcement of low-rate response (DRL) 72-s task in rats.氯胺酮光学异构体、氟西汀和纳洛酮对大鼠低速率反应(DRL)72秒任务中定时的影响。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023 Feb;67:37-52. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2022.11.007. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
8
Fos expression in the prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum after exposure to a free-operant timing schedule.暴露于自由操作定时程序后前额皮质和腹侧纹状体中的 Fos 表达。
Behav Brain Res. 2012 Dec 1;235(2):273-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
9
The hippocampus, collateral behavior, and timing.海马体、附带行为与时间安排。
Behav Neurosci. 1983 Dec;97(6):857-72. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.97.6.857.
10
Do pigeons prefer information in the absence of differential reinforcement?鸽子在没有差别强化的情况下更喜欢信息吗?
Learn Behav. 2012 Dec;40(4):465-75. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0067-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of the estrous cycle on impulsive choice and interval timing in female rats.发情周期对雌性大鼠冲动选择和时距计时的影响。
Horm Behav. 2023 Mar;149:105315. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2023.105315. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
2
Slowly evolving dopaminergic activity modulates the moment-to-moment probability of reward-related self-timed movements.缓慢演变的多巴胺能活动调节与奖励相关的自我定时运动的即时概率。
Elife. 2021 Dec 23;10:e62583. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62583.
3
Gabapentin attenuates somatic signs of precipitated THC withdrawal in mice.加巴喷丁可减轻小鼠 THC 戒断躯体症状。

本文引用的文献

1
Selective attention in pigeon temporal discrimination.鸽子时间辨别中的选择性注意
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Feb;72(2):298-310. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1360921. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
2
Impulsive choice and pre-exposure to delays: III. Four-month test-retest outcomes in male wistar rats.冲动选择与延迟前暴露:III. 雄性Wistar大鼠四个月的重测结果
Behav Processes. 2016 May;126:108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
3
Mechanisms of impulsive choice: III. The role of reward processes.冲动选择的机制:III. 奖励过程的作用。
Neuropharmacology. 2021 Jun 1;190:108554. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108554. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
4
Precipitated Δ9-THC withdrawal reduces motivation for sucrose reinforcement in mice.沉淀的 Δ9-THC 戒断会降低小鼠对蔗糖强化的动机。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2020 Aug;195:172966. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2020.172966. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
5
Cognitive and behavioral training interventions to promote self-control.促进自我控制的认知和行为训练干预措施。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(3):259-279. doi: 10.1037/xan0000208. Epub 2019 May 9.
Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:134-48. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
4
Mechanisms of impulsive choice: II. Time-based interventions to improve self-control.冲动选择的机制:II. 基于时间的干预措施以提高自我控制能力。
Behav Processes. 2015 Mar;112:29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
5
Impulsive choice, alcohol consumption, and pre-exposure to delayed rewards: II. Potential mechanisms.冲动选择、酒精消费与延迟奖励的预暴露:II. 潜在机制
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):33-49. doi: 10.1002/jeab.116. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
6
Altering impulsive decision making with an acceptance-based procedure.通过基于接纳的程序改变冲动决策。
Behav Ther. 2014 Sep;45(5):630-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
7
Mechanisms of impulsive choice: I. Individual differences in interval timing and reward processing.冲动选择的机制:I. 间隔计时与奖励处理中的个体差异。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jul;102(1):86-101. doi: 10.1002/jeab.88. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
8
Isolating the delay component of impulsive choice in adolescent rats.分离青少年大鼠冲动选择的延迟成分。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2014 Jan 27;8:3. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00003. eCollection 2014.
9
Early and prolonged exposure to reward delay: effects on impulsive choice and alcohol self-administration in male rats.早期和长时间的奖励延迟暴露:对雄性大鼠冲动选择和酒精自我给药的影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Apr;21(2):172-80. doi: 10.1037/a0031245. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
10
Delay discounting and gambling.延迟折扣与赌博。
Behav Processes. 2011 May;87(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Feb 23.