Suppr超能文献

冲动选择、酒精消费与延迟奖励的预暴露:II. 潜在机制

Impulsive choice, alcohol consumption, and pre-exposure to delayed rewards: II. Potential mechanisms.

作者信息

Stein Jeffrey S, Renda C Renee, Hinnenkamp Jay E, Madden Gregory J

机构信息

Utah State University.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):33-49. doi: 10.1002/jeab.116. Epub 2014 Nov 23.

Abstract

In a prior study (Stein et al., 2013), we reported that rats pre-exposed to delayed rewards made fewer impulsive choices, but consumed more alcohol (12% wt/vol), than rats pre-exposed to immediate rewards. To understand the mechanisms that produced these findings, we again pre-exposed rats to either delayed (17.5 s; n=32) or immediate (n=30) rewards. In posttests, delay-exposed rats made significantly fewer impulsive choices at 15- and 30-s delays to a larger, later food reward than the immediacy-exposed comparison group. Behavior in an open-field test provided little evidence of differential stress exposure between groups. Further, consumption of either 12% alcohol or isocaloric sucrose in subsequent tests did not differ between groups. Because Stein et al. introduced alcohol concentration gradually (3-12%), we speculate that their group differences in 12% alcohol consumption were not determined by alcohol's pharmacological effects, but by another variable (e.g., taste) that was preserved as an artifact from lower concentrations. We conclude that pre-exposure to delayed rewards generalizes beyond the pre-exposure delay; however, this same experimental variable does not robustly influence alcohol consumption.

摘要

在之前的一项研究中(斯坦因等人,2013年),我们报告称,与预先接触即时奖励的大鼠相比,预先接触延迟奖励的大鼠做出的冲动选择更少,但饮用的酒精更多(12%重量/体积)。为了理解产生这些结果的机制,我们再次将大鼠预先暴露于延迟(17.5秒;n = 32)或即时(n = 30)奖励中。在测试后,与即时暴露的对照组相比,延迟暴露的大鼠在面对更大、更晚的食物奖励时,在15秒和30秒延迟时做出的冲动选择明显更少。旷场试验中的行为几乎没有提供两组之间应激暴露差异的证据。此外,在后续测试中,两组对12%酒精或等热量蔗糖的摄入量没有差异。由于斯坦因等人是逐渐引入酒精浓度(3%-12%)的,我们推测他们在12%酒精摄入量上的组间差异不是由酒精的药理作用决定的,而是由另一个变量(例如味道)决定的,这个变量作为低浓度时的人为因素保留了下来。我们得出结论,预先接触延迟奖励的影响超出了预先接触延迟的范围;然而,这个相同的实验变量对酒精摄入量没有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Impulsive choice, alcohol consumption, and pre-exposure to delayed rewards: II. Potential mechanisms.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):33-49. doi: 10.1002/jeab.116. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
3
Impulsive choice predicts anxiety-like behavior, but not alcohol or sucrose consumption, in male Long-Evans rats.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 May;39(5):932-40. doi: 10.1111/acer.12713. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Impulsive choice and pre-exposure to delays: III. Four-month test-retest outcomes in male wistar rats.
Behav Processes. 2016 May;126:108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Early and prolonged exposure to reward delay: effects on impulsive choice and alcohol self-administration in male rats.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Apr;21(2):172-80. doi: 10.1037/a0031245. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
10
Reducing impulsive choice: VIII. Effects of delay-exposure training in female rats.
Behav Processes. 2022 Apr;197:104622. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104622. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

2
Mechanisms of impulsive choice: Experiments to explore and models to map the empirical terrain.
Learn Behav. 2023 Dec;51(4):355-391. doi: 10.3758/s13420-023-00577-1. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
3
Reducing impulsive choice: VIII. Effects of delay-exposure training in female rats.
Behav Processes. 2022 Apr;197:104622. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104622. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
4
Generalizability of time-based interventions: Effects of choice procedure and smaller-sooner delay.
Behav Processes. 2022 Mar;196:104584. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104584. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
5
Reducing impulsive choice VII: effects of duration of delay-exposure training.
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jan;24(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01412-0. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
A time-based intervention to treat impulsivity in male and female rats.
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Feb 3;379:112316. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112316. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
Changing Delay Discounting and Impulsive Choice: Implications for Addictions, Prevention, and Human Health.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Sep;42(3):397-417. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00200-7. Epub 2019 May 9.
8
Reducing impulsive choice: VI. Delay-exposure training reduces aversion to delay-signaling stimuli.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):147-155. doi: 10.1037/adb0000495. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
10
Punishment and reinforcement by opioid receptor agonists in a choice procedure in rats.
Behav Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;30(4):335-342. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000436.

本文引用的文献

1
A QUANTITATIVE SIGNATURE OF SELF-CONTROL REPAIR: RATE-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF SUCCESSFUL ADDICTION TREATMENT.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2014 Nov;2(6):685-695. doi: 10.1177/2167702614528162. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
2
Impulsive choice predicts anxiety-like behavior, but not alcohol or sucrose consumption, in male Long-Evans rats.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 May;39(5):932-40. doi: 10.1111/acer.12713. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
4
Increased delay discounting tracks with a high ethanol-seeking phenotype and subsequent ethanol seeking but not consumption.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Oct;38(10):2607-14. doi: 10.1111/acer.12523. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
5
Do the adjusting-delay and increasing-delay tasks measure the same construct: delay discounting?
Behav Pharmacol. 2014 Aug;25(4):306-15. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000055.
6
Mechanisms of impulsive choice: I. Individual differences in interval timing and reward processing.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jul;102(1):86-101. doi: 10.1002/jeab.88. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
8
Delayed reinforcement and fixed-ratio performance.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Nov;100(3):370-95. doi: 10.1002/jeab.48. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
9
Postreward delays and systematic biases in measures of animal temporal discounting.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 17;110(38):15491-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310446110. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
10
Pramipexole-induced disruption of behavioral processes fundamental to intertemporal choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 May;99(3):290-317. doi: 10.1002/jeab.21. Epub 2013 Feb 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验