Stein Jeffrey S, Renda C Renee, Hinnenkamp Jay E, Madden Gregory J
Utah State University.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):33-49. doi: 10.1002/jeab.116. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
In a prior study (Stein et al., 2013), we reported that rats pre-exposed to delayed rewards made fewer impulsive choices, but consumed more alcohol (12% wt/vol), than rats pre-exposed to immediate rewards. To understand the mechanisms that produced these findings, we again pre-exposed rats to either delayed (17.5 s; n=32) or immediate (n=30) rewards. In posttests, delay-exposed rats made significantly fewer impulsive choices at 15- and 30-s delays to a larger, later food reward than the immediacy-exposed comparison group. Behavior in an open-field test provided little evidence of differential stress exposure between groups. Further, consumption of either 12% alcohol or isocaloric sucrose in subsequent tests did not differ between groups. Because Stein et al. introduced alcohol concentration gradually (3-12%), we speculate that their group differences in 12% alcohol consumption were not determined by alcohol's pharmacological effects, but by another variable (e.g., taste) that was preserved as an artifact from lower concentrations. We conclude that pre-exposure to delayed rewards generalizes beyond the pre-exposure delay; however, this same experimental variable does not robustly influence alcohol consumption.
在之前的一项研究中(斯坦因等人,2013年),我们报告称,与预先接触即时奖励的大鼠相比,预先接触延迟奖励的大鼠做出的冲动选择更少,但饮用的酒精更多(12%重量/体积)。为了理解产生这些结果的机制,我们再次将大鼠预先暴露于延迟(17.5秒;n = 32)或即时(n = 30)奖励中。在测试后,与即时暴露的对照组相比,延迟暴露的大鼠在面对更大、更晚的食物奖励时,在15秒和30秒延迟时做出的冲动选择明显更少。旷场试验中的行为几乎没有提供两组之间应激暴露差异的证据。此外,在后续测试中,两组对12%酒精或等热量蔗糖的摄入量没有差异。由于斯坦因等人是逐渐引入酒精浓度(3%-12%)的,我们推测他们在12%酒精摄入量上的组间差异不是由酒精的药理作用决定的,而是由另一个变量(例如味道)决定的,这个变量作为低浓度时的人为因素保留了下来。我们得出结论,预先接触延迟奖励的影响超出了预先接触延迟的范围;然而,这个相同的实验变量对酒精摄入量没有显著影响。