• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放性、非强制性由依那西普原研药转换为生物类似药 SB4:一项对照队列研究的 6 个月结果。

Open-Label, Non-Mandatory Transitioning From Originator Etanercept to Biosimilar SB4: Six-Month Results From a Controlled Cohort Study.

机构信息

Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Sint Maartenskliniek and Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Sep;70(9):1408-1418. doi: 10.1002/art.40516. Epub 2018 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1002/art.40516
PMID:29609207
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of non-mandatory transitioning from the originator biologic drug etanercept (ETN) to its biosimilar, SB4, on drug survival and effectiveness in a controlled cohort study of patients with an inflammatory rheumatic disease.

METHODS

In 2016, 642 patients were asked to transition their treatment from originator ETN to biosimilar SB4 by a structured communication strategy with opt-out option. Patients who consented to switch to SB4 were considered eligible for inclusion in the transition cohort, while patients being treated with originator ETN in 2014 were recruited as the historical cohort. Drug survival was compared between the 2 cohorts using Cox regression analyses, which were adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, ETN treatment duration, ETN dose interval, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug usage, and C-reactive protein (CRP) level, with a robust variance estimator applied to account for repeated subjects (i.e., patients who were included in both the transition cohort and the historical cohort). Adjusted differences in the 6-month change in CRP level, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using CRP level (DAS28-CRP), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 642 ETN-treated patients, 635 (99%) agreed to transition from originator ETN to biosimilar SB4, of whom 625 patients (433 with rheumatoid arthritis, 128 with psoriatic arthritis, and 64 with ankylosing spondylitis) were included in the transition cohort, and 600 ETN-treated patients from 2014 were included in the historical cohort. The crude treatment persistence rate for biosimilar SB4 over 6 months was 90% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 88-93%), compared to a 6-month treatment persistence rate of 92% (95% CI 90-94%) for originator ETN. Patients in the transition cohort, compared to the historical cohort, had a statistically significantly higher relative risk of treatment discontinuation (adjusted hazard ratio 1.57, 95% CI 1.05-2.36) and showed smaller decreases in the CRP level (adjusted difference 1.8, 95% CI 0.3-3.2) and DAS28-CRP (adjusted difference 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.25) over 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Non-mandatory transitioning from originator ETN to biosimilar SB4 using a specifically designed communication strategy resulted in a slightly lower 6-month treatment persistence rate and smaller decreases in disease activity in the transition cohort compared to the historical cohort, but these differences were not considered clinically relevant.

摘要

目的

在一项对炎性风湿病患者的对照队列研究中,评估将生物仿制药依那西普(ETN)从原始药物过渡到其生物类似药 SB4 对药物存活率和疗效的影响。

方法

2016 年,642 名患者被要求通过结构化的沟通策略(带有选择退出选项)将他们的治疗从原始 ETN 过渡到生物类似药 SB4。同意转换为 SB4 的患者被认为符合纳入转换队列的条件,而在 2014 年接受原始 ETN 治疗的患者被招募为历史队列。使用 Cox 回归分析比较了两个队列之间的药物存活率,该分析调整了年龄、性别、诊断、ETN 治疗持续时间、ETN 剂量间隔、常规合成疾病修饰抗风湿药物使用和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平,采用稳健方差估计来考虑重复的受试者(即同时被纳入转换队列和历史队列的患者)。还评估了 6 个月时 CRP 水平变化、使用 CRP 水平的 28 个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28-CRP)和 Bath 强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数的 6 个月变化的调整差异。

结果

在 642 名接受 ETN 治疗的患者中,有 635 名(99%)同意从原始 ETN 过渡到生物类似药 SB4,其中 625 名患者(433 名患有类风湿关节炎、128 名患有银屑病关节炎和 64 名患有强直性脊柱炎)被纳入转换队列,而 600 名 ETN 治疗患者于 2014 年被纳入历史队列。生物类似药 SB4 在 6 个月内的治疗持续率为 90%(95%置信区间[95%CI]88-93%),而原始 ETN 的 6 个月治疗持续率为 92%(95%CI 90-94%)。与历史队列相比,转换队列中的患者停药的相对风险更高(调整后的危险比为 1.57,95%CI 1.05-2.36),并且在 6 个月内 CRP 水平(调整后的差异为 1.8,95%CI 0.3-3.2)和 DAS28-CRP(调整后的差异为 0.15,95%CI 0.05-0.25)的下降幅度较小。

结论

使用专门设计的沟通策略,从原始 ETN 到生物类似药 SB4 的非强制性转换导致转换队列的 6 个月治疗持续率略低,疾病活动度降低幅度小于历史队列,但这些差异被认为无临床意义。

相似文献

1
Open-Label, Non-Mandatory Transitioning From Originator Etanercept to Biosimilar SB4: Six-Month Results From a Controlled Cohort Study.开放性、非强制性由依那西普原研药转换为生物类似药 SB4:一项对照队列研究的 6 个月结果。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Sep;70(9):1408-1418. doi: 10.1002/art.40516. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
2
Post-switch Effectiveness of Etanercept Biosimilar Versus Continued Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Stable Disease: A Prospective Multinational Observational Study.依那西普生物类似药转换治疗与继续使用依那西普治疗对病情稳定的类风湿关节炎患者的疗效:一项前瞻性多国观察性研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 Nov;39(11):5259-5273. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02303-1. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
3
To switch or not to switch: results of a nationwide guideline of mandatory switching from originator to biosimilar etanercept. One-year treatment outcomes in 2061 patients with inflammatory arthritis from the DANBIO registry.是否切换:全国强制性从原研药切换至生物类似药依那西普的指南结果。DANBIO 登记处 2061 例炎性关节炎患者的 1 年治疗结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb;78(2):192-200. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213474. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
4
Comparative Effectiveness and Persistence of SB4 and Reference Etanercept in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis in Norway.挪威银屑病关节炎患者中 SB4 与参照依那西普的疗效和持久性比较。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 Sep;76(9):1303-1312. doi: 10.1002/acr.25345. Epub 2024 May 29.
5
Comparative effectiveness of etanercept originator and biosimilar for treating rheumatoid arthritis: implications for cost-savings.原研药与生物类似药的依那西普治疗类风湿性关节炎的疗效比较:对节省成本的影响
Intern Med J. 2024 May;54(5):795-801. doi: 10.1111/imj.16296. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Efficacy and safety of original and biosimilar etanercept (SB4) in active rheumatoid arthritis - A comparison in a real-world national cohort.原研药和生物类似药依那西普(SB4)在活动性类风湿关节炎中的疗效和安全性——一项全国真实世界队列研究的比较
Biologicals. 2019 Nov;62:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
7
Subjective Complaints as the Main Reason for Biosimilar Discontinuation After Open-Label Transition From Reference Infliximab to Biosimilar Infliximab.因开放标签转换至生物类似药后主观抱怨而停止使用生物类似药英夫利昔单抗。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Jan;70(1):60-68. doi: 10.1002/art.40324. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
A randomized phase l pharmacokinetic study comparing SB4 and etanercept reference product (Enbrel®) in healthy subjects.一项在健康受试者中比较SB4与依那西普参比产品(恩利®)的随机I期药代动力学研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul;82(1):64-73. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12929. Epub 2016 May 2.
9
The switch from etanercept originator to SB4: data from a real-life experience on tolerability and persistence on treatment in joint inflammatory diseases.从原研依那西普转换为SB4:来自关节炎症性疾病治疗耐受性和持续性真实生活经验的数据。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2020 Oct 13;12:1759720X20964031. doi: 10.1177/1759720X20964031. eCollection 2020.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar and Originator Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Real-Life Data.生物类似药和原研依那西普在类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性:真实世界数据。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2021 Jun;23(6):344-349.

引用本文的文献

1
Switch acceptance and persistence of adalimumab biosimilars in IBD patients: a prospective observational study.阿达木单抗生物类似药在炎症性肠病患者中的转换接受度和持续性:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 23;18:17562848251332025. doi: 10.1177/17562848251332025. eCollection 2025.
2
Mitigating the Nocebo Effect in Biosimilar Use and Switching: A Systematic Review.减轻生物类似药使用和换药中的反安慰剂效应:一项系统评价
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 Nov;38(6):429-455. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00541-y. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
3
Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilars compared with the biologic etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
比较生物类似药与依那西普生物制剂在类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 27;13(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02715-w.
4
Consensus-Based Overarching Principles and Recommendations on the Use of Biosimilars in the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis in the Gulf Region.《海湾地区炎症性关节炎生物类似药治疗应用的共识性总体原则和推荐意见》。
BioDrugs. 2024 May;38(3):449-463. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00642-1. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
5
Use of external control arms in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review.使用外部控制臂治疗免疫介导的炎症性疾病:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 9;13(12):e076677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076677.
6
Rheumatology Patients' Experiences of a Mandatory Nationwide Transition to an Adalimumab Biosimilar.风湿病患者对全国范围内强制转换为阿达木单抗生物类似药的体验。
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2024 Feb;6(2):64-71. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11634. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
7
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of SDZ ETN, an Etanercept Biosimilar, in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Final Results from Multi-Country COMPACT Study.真实世界中依那西普生物类似药 SDZ ETN 治疗风湿性疾病的疗效和安全性:多国 COMPACT 研究的最终结果。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jan;41(1):315-330. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02706-8. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
8
The impact of policy interventions to promote the uptake of biosimilar medicines in Belgium: a nationwide interrupted time series analysis.政策干预对促进比利时生物类似药使用的影响:全国中断时间序列分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jul 6;21(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01015-4.
9
Outcome of adult patients with JIA treated with the biosimilar Benepali: results of the biologic register JuMBO.生物类似药 Benepali 治疗的成人类风湿关节炎患者的结局:生物制剂注册登记 JuMBO 的结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Dec 13;24(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02968-7.
10
Continuous effectiveness and safety after a hospital-wide switch to adalimumab biosimilar: An observational study in rheumatoid arthritis patients.阿达木单抗生物类似药全院转换后的持续疗效和安全性:类风湿关节炎患者的观察性研究。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022 Dec;10(6):e01025. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1025.