The DANBIO registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb;78(2):192-200. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213474. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
Real-world evidence on effectiveness of switching to biosimila r etanercept is scarce. In Denmark, a nationwide guideline of mandatory switch from 50 mg originator (ETA) to biosimilar (SB4) etanercept was issued for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) in 2016. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were studied in ETA-treated patients, who switched to SB4 (switchers) or maintained ETA (non-switchers). Retention rates were compared with that of a historic cohort of ETA-treated patients. Switchers who resumed ETA treatment (back-switchers) were characterised.
Observational cohort study based on the DANBIO registry. Treatment retention was explored by Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression (crude, adjusted).
1621 (79%) of 2061 ETA-treated patients switched to SB4. Disease activity was unchanged 3 months' preswitch/postswitch. Non-switchers often received 25 mg ETA (ETA 25 mg pens/syringes and powder solution were still available). One-year adjusted retention rates were: non-switchers: 77% (95% CI: 72% to 82%)/switchers: 83% (79% to 87%)/historic cohort: 90% (88% to 92%). Patients not in remission had lower retention rates than patients in remission, both in switchers (crude HR 1.7 (1.3 to 2.2)) and non-switchers (2.4 (1.7 to 3.6)). During follow-up, 120 patients (7% of switchers) back-switched to ETA. Back-switchers' clinical characteristics were similar to switchers, and reasons for SB4 withdrawal were mainly subjective.
Seventy-nine per cent of patients switched from ETA to SB4. After 1 year, adjusted treatment retention rates were lower in switchers versus the historic ETA cohort, but higher than in non-switchers. Withdrawal was more common in patients not in remission. The results suggest that switch outcomes in routine care are affected by patient-related factors and non-specific drug effects.
关于转换为生物仿制药依那西普的疗效的真实世界证据很少。2016 年,丹麦发布了一项全国性指南,要求类风湿关节炎(RA)、银屑病关节炎(PsA)和中轴型脊柱关节炎(AxSpA)患者将 50mg 原研依那西普(ETA)转换为生物类似药(SB4)依那西普。本研究旨在探讨 ETA 治疗的患者转换为 SB4(转换者)或继续使用 ETA(非转换者)的临床特征和治疗结局。并与ETA 治疗的历史队列进行了比较。
本研究为 DANBIO 注册研究的观察性队列研究。通过 Kaplan-Meier 图和 Cox 回归(未调整和调整)探索治疗保留情况。
2061 名接受 ETA 治疗的患者中有 1621 名(79%)转换为 SB4。转换前/转换后 3 个月疾病活动度无变化。非转换者通常接受 25mg ETA(ETA 25mg 笔/注射器和粉末溶液仍可获得)。调整后的 1 年保留率为:非转换者:77%(95%CI:72%82%)/转换者:83%(79%87%)/历史队列:90%(88%92%)。未缓解的患者比缓解的患者保留率低,转换者(未调整 HR 1.7[1.32.2])和非转换者(2.4[1.7~3.6])均如此。在随访期间,120 名患者(转换者的 7%)转回 ETA。转回 ETA 的患者的临床特征与转换者相似,而停止使用 SB4 的主要原因是主观的。
79%的患者从 ETA 转换为 SB4。1 年后,与历史 ETA 队列相比,转换者的调整治疗保留率较低,但高于非转换者。未缓解的患者停药更为常见。结果表明,常规治疗中的转换结果受患者相关因素和非特异性药物作用的影响。