Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Apr 15;14(4):575-583. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7048.
To assess the overall clinical effectiveness of a sleep position trainer (SPT) in patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) and to evaluate how many patients were willing to continue treatment after a 1-month trial period.
Patients in whom POSA was diagnosed underwent a 1-month trial period with the SPT. Home sleep apnea tests were used to measure baseline data and data following the trial period with the SPT.
The 79 patients who completed the study protocol were 81% male, had a mean age of 52 ± 12 years, and a median baseline respiratory event index (REI) of 11 (8, 16) events/h. A significant reduction in overall REI to 5 (3, 10) events/h was observed with the SPT as compared to baseline ( < .001). The median percentage of sleep time in the supine position decreased significantly from 27 (20, 48) to 7 (2, 20) with the SPT ( < .001). Adherence was found to be 95 ± 8%. Of the 44 patients who decided to continue treatment, 27 were categorized as responders (having a decrease in REI of at least 50%) and 17 were non-responders. The most important reasons for not purchasing the SPT were poor objective results, intolerance to the vibrations, cost of the device, persistent daytime sleepiness, or patient preference for other treatment options.
Treatment with the SPT came with high adherence rates and was effective in reducing REI and supine sleep position. The trial period is in the patients' best interest, as it may prevent those who will not benefit from positional training from purchasing an SPT.
评估睡眠体位训练器(SPT)在体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(POSA)患者中的整体临床疗效,并评估有多少患者愿意在 1 个月的试用后继续治疗。
诊断为 POSA 的患者进行了为期 1 个月的 SPT 试用。家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试用于测量基线数据和 SPT 试用后的数据。
完成研究方案的 79 名患者中,81%为男性,平均年龄为 52±12 岁,基线呼吸事件指数(REI)中位数为 11(8,16)/小时。与基线相比,SPT 可显著降低整体 REI 至 5(3,10)/小时(<0.001)。SPT 可使仰卧位睡眠时间的中位数从 27%(20%,48%)显著减少至 7%(2%,20%)(<0.001)。发现依从率为 95±8%。在决定继续治疗的 44 名患者中,27 名被归类为应答者(REI 降低至少 50%),17 名是非应答者。不购买 SPT 的最重要原因是客观结果不佳、对振动不耐受、设备成本、持续日间嗜睡或患者更喜欢其他治疗选择。
SPT 治疗具有较高的依从率,可有效降低 REI 和仰卧位睡眠姿势。试用期符合患者的最佳利益,因为它可以防止那些不会从体位训练中受益的患者购买 SPT。