Suppr超能文献

评估睡眠姿势训练器在体位性睡眠呼吸暂停患者中的试用阶段。

Evaluation of a Trial Period With a Sleep Position Trainer in Patients With Positional Sleep Apnea.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Apr 15;14(4):575-583. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7048.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess the overall clinical effectiveness of a sleep position trainer (SPT) in patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) and to evaluate how many patients were willing to continue treatment after a 1-month trial period.

METHODS

Patients in whom POSA was diagnosed underwent a 1-month trial period with the SPT. Home sleep apnea tests were used to measure baseline data and data following the trial period with the SPT.

RESULTS

The 79 patients who completed the study protocol were 81% male, had a mean age of 52 ± 12 years, and a median baseline respiratory event index (REI) of 11 (8, 16) events/h. A significant reduction in overall REI to 5 (3, 10) events/h was observed with the SPT as compared to baseline ( < .001). The median percentage of sleep time in the supine position decreased significantly from 27 (20, 48) to 7 (2, 20) with the SPT ( < .001). Adherence was found to be 95 ± 8%. Of the 44 patients who decided to continue treatment, 27 were categorized as responders (having a decrease in REI of at least 50%) and 17 were non-responders. The most important reasons for not purchasing the SPT were poor objective results, intolerance to the vibrations, cost of the device, persistent daytime sleepiness, or patient preference for other treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with the SPT came with high adherence rates and was effective in reducing REI and supine sleep position. The trial period is in the patients' best interest, as it may prevent those who will not benefit from positional training from purchasing an SPT.

摘要

研究目的

评估睡眠体位训练器(SPT)在体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(POSA)患者中的整体临床疗效,并评估有多少患者愿意在 1 个月的试用后继续治疗。

方法

诊断为 POSA 的患者进行了为期 1 个月的 SPT 试用。家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试用于测量基线数据和 SPT 试用后的数据。

结果

完成研究方案的 79 名患者中,81%为男性,平均年龄为 52±12 岁,基线呼吸事件指数(REI)中位数为 11(8,16)/小时。与基线相比,SPT 可显著降低整体 REI 至 5(3,10)/小时(<0.001)。SPT 可使仰卧位睡眠时间的中位数从 27%(20%,48%)显著减少至 7%(2%,20%)(<0.001)。发现依从率为 95±8%。在决定继续治疗的 44 名患者中,27 名被归类为应答者(REI 降低至少 50%),17 名是非应答者。不购买 SPT 的最重要原因是客观结果不佳、对振动不耐受、设备成本、持续日间嗜睡或患者更喜欢其他治疗选择。

结论

SPT 治疗具有较高的依从率,可有效降低 REI 和仰卧位睡眠姿势。试用期符合患者的最佳利益,因为它可以防止那些不会从体位训练中受益的患者购买 SPT。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Trial Period With a Sleep Position Trainer in Patients With Positional Sleep Apnea.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Apr 15;14(4):575-583. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7048.
3
Positional obstructive sleep apnoea: challenging findings in consecutive patients treated with a vibrating position trainer.
Acta Clin Belg. 2019 Dec;74(6):405-413. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1545374. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
4
Positional therapy in patients with residual positional obstructive sleep apnea after upper airway surgery.
Sleep Breath. 2017 May;21(2):279-288. doi: 10.1007/s11325-016-1397-x. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
7
The sleep position trainer: a new treatment for positional obstructive sleep apnoea.
Sleep Breath. 2013 May;17(2):771-9. doi: 10.1007/s11325-012-0764-5. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
8
Treatment of sleep-disordered breathing with positional therapy: long-term results.
Sleep Breath. 2019 Dec;23(4):1141-1149. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-01792-9. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
10
Sleep position trainer versus tennis ball technique in positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Jan 15;11(2):139-47. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4460.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy in a Belgian Cohort of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients.
Life (Basel). 2024 Jun 21;14(7):788. doi: 10.3390/life14070788.
2
Smart mandibular advancement devices for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic literature review.
Sleep Breath. 2024 Oct;28(5):1879-1887. doi: 10.1007/s11325-024-03068-3. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
5
Non-CPAP therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea.
Breathe (Sheff). 2022 Sep;18(3):220164. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0164-2022. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
Subtypes of obstructive sleep apnea in children and related factors.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Oct 1;18(10):2397-2404. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10124.
7
Current and novel treatment options for obstructive sleep apnoea.
ERJ Open Res. 2022 Jun 27;8(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00126-2022. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Persistent OSA in obese children: does body position matter?
J Clin Sleep Med. 2021 Feb 1;17(2):227-232. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8902.

本文引用的文献

1
Night-to-night variability of obstructive sleep apnea.
J Sleep Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):782-788. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12558. Epub 2017 May 26.
3
Positional modification techniques for supine obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sleep Med Rev. 2017 Dec;36:107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
Positional therapy in patients with residual positional obstructive sleep apnea after upper airway surgery.
Sleep Breath. 2017 May;21(2):279-288. doi: 10.1007/s11325-016-1397-x. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
Sleep position trainer versus tennis ball technique in positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Jan 15;11(2):139-47. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4460.
6
A promising concept of combination therapy for positional obstructive sleep apnea.
Sleep Breath. 2015 May;19(2):637-44. doi: 10.1007/s11325-014-1068-8. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
7
Assessment of a neck-based treatment and monitoring device for positional obstructive sleep apnea.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Aug 15;10(8):863-71. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.3956.
9
Analysis of the influence of head rotation during drug-induced sleep endoscopy in obstructive sleep apnea.
Laryngoscope. 2014 Sep;124(9):2195-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.24598. Epub 2014 Mar 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验