Suppr超能文献

全科医生怀疑莱姆病时的诊断行为:一项2010 - 2015年的数据库研究

Diagnostic behaviour of general practitioners when suspecting Lyme disease: a database study from 2010-2015.

作者信息

Botman Esmée, Ang C Wim, Joosten Johanna H K, Slottje Pauline, van der Wouden Johannes C, Maarsingh Otto R

机构信息

Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine and Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Microbiology & Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Apr 3;19(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0729-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to the raised public awareness of Lyme Borreliosis (LB), its increased incidence and the increased availability of serological tests, the demand for diagnostic testing on LB has increased. This may affect the diagnostic behaviour of general practitioners (GPs). Aim of our study was to describe GPs' diagnostic behaviour when suspecting LB.

METHODS

In this descriptive study from January 2010 to June 2015, we used the anonymized electronic medical records of 56,996 patients registered in 12 general practices in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The target population was identified by means of an extensive search strategy, based on International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-1) codes, free text and diagnostic test codes. All contacts related to LB were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

2311 patients were included, accounting for 3861 LB contacts and 2619 LB episodes. The distribution of LB contacts showed annual peaks during spring and summer. Serological testing was performed in 36.4% of LB episodes and was mostly requested in patients presenting with general symptoms (71.4%). Unnecessary testing often occurred and only 5.9% of the tests turned out to be positive by immunoblot. From January 2010 to June 2015, no significant differences were found in the number of requested serological tests. The level of serological testing during LB episodes differed significantly between the general practices (19.2% to 75.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to clinical guidelines, GPs regularly requested serology even when there was a low suspicion of LB. The development of an easy-to-use diagnostic algorithm may decrease overuse of diagnostic tests and thereby reduce overtreatment of LB.

摘要

背景

由于公众对莱姆病(LB)的认识提高、发病率上升以及血清学检测的可及性增加,对LB诊断检测的需求也随之增加。这可能会影响全科医生(GPs)的诊断行为。我们研究的目的是描述全科医生怀疑患有LB时的诊断行为。

方法

在这项从2010年1月至2015年6月的描述性研究中,我们使用了荷兰阿姆斯特丹12家全科诊所登记的56996名患者的匿名电子病历。通过基于国际初级保健分类(ICPC - 1)代码、自由文本和诊断测试代码的广泛搜索策略来确定目标人群。所有与LB相关的接触均纳入分析。

结果

纳入2311名患者,共计3861次LB接触和2619次LB发作。LB接触的分布在春季和夏季出现年度高峰。在36.4%的LB发作中进行了血清学检测,大多数检测是针对出现全身症状的患者(71.4%)。不必要的检测经常发生,通过免疫印迹法检测结果仅5.9%呈阳性。从2010年1月至2015年6月,所要求的血清学检测数量未发现显著差异。各全科诊所在LB发作期间的血清学检测水平差异显著(19.2%至75.8%)。

结论

与临床指南相反,即使对LB的怀疑程度较低,全科医生仍经常要求进行血清学检测。开发一种易于使用的诊断算法可能会减少诊断检测的过度使用,从而减少LB的过度治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b6/5883407/e1b2fdd50e5c/12875_2018_729_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验