Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Cancer Res. 2018 Jun 15;78(12):3112-3121. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2310. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
Although the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations of primary breast cancers has been extensively catalogued, the genetic differences between primary and metastatic tumors have been less studied. In this study, we compared somatic mutations and gene copy number alterations of primary breast cancers and their matched metastases from patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease. DNA samples obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded ER-negative/HER2-positive ( = 9) and ER-, progesterone receptor (PR-), HER2-negative ( = 8) primary breast cancers and from paired brain or skin metastases and normal tissue were subjected to a hybridization capture-based massively parallel sequencing assay, targeting 341 key cancer genes. A large subset of nonsynonymous somatic mutations (45%) and gene copy number alterations (55%) was shared between the primary tumors and paired metastases. However, mutations restricted to either a given primary tumor or its metastasis, the acquisition of loss of heterozygosity of the wild-type allele, and clonal shifts of genes affected by somatic mutations, such as and , were observed in the progression from primary tumors to metastases. No metastasis location-specific alterations were identified, but synchronous metastases showed higher concordance with the paired primary tumor than metachronous metastases. Novel potentially targetable alterations were found in the metastases relative to their matched primary tumors. These data indicate that repertoires of somatic genetic alterations in ER-negative metastatic breast cancers may differ from those of their primary tumors, even by the presence of driver and targetable somatic genetic alterations. Somatic genetic alterations in ER-negative breast cancer metastases may be distinct from those of their primary tumors, suggesting that for treatment-decision making, genetic analyses of DNA obtained from the metastatic lesion rather than from the primary tumor should be considered. .
尽管原发性乳腺癌的体细胞遗传改变谱已被广泛研究,但原发性肿瘤和转移性肿瘤之间的遗传差异研究较少。在这项研究中,我们比较了雌激素受体(ER)阴性疾病患者的原发性乳腺癌及其配对转移灶的体细胞突变和基因拷贝数改变。从福尔马林固定石蜡包埋的 ER 阴性/HER2 阳性(=9)和 ER-、孕激素受体(PR)-、HER2 阴性(=8)原发性乳腺癌以及配对的脑或皮肤转移灶和正常组织中获得 DNA 样本,进行基于杂交捕获的大规模平行测序检测,靶向 341 个关键癌症基因。大量非同义体细胞突变(45%)和基因拷贝数改变(55%)在原发性肿瘤和配对转移灶之间共享。然而,在从原发性肿瘤到转移灶的进展过程中,观察到局限于特定原发性肿瘤或其转移灶的突变、野生型等位基因杂合性丢失的获得以及受体细胞突变影响的基因的克隆转移,如 和 。没有发现特定转移部位的改变,但同步转移与配对的原发性肿瘤的一致性高于异时转移。与配对的原发性肿瘤相比,转移灶中发现了新的潜在可靶向改变。这些数据表明,ER 阴性转移性乳腺癌的体细胞遗传改变谱可能与原发性肿瘤不同,即使存在驱动基因和可靶向的体细胞遗传改变也是如此。ER 阴性乳腺癌转移灶的体细胞遗传改变可能与原发性肿瘤不同,这表明在治疗决策时,应考虑从转移灶而不是原发性肿瘤获得的 DNA 的遗传分析。.