• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

端粒、双链断裂、微管和马达研究揭示的受损DNA迁移悖论的定义

Defining the Damaged DNA Mobility Paradox as Revealed by the Study of Telomeres, DSBs, Microtubules and Motors.

作者信息

Mekhail Karim

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, MaRS Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Canada Research Chairs Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2018 Mar 20;9:95. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00095. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fgene.2018.00095
PMID:29616083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5869915/
Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes are non-randomly arranged inside the nucleus. Despite this ordered spatial genome organization, damaged DNA exhibits increased random mobility within nuclear space. This increased random movement is thought to promote DNA repair by facilitating homology search, allowing targeting to repair-conducive nuclear domains, or releasing damage from repair-repressive locations. Recent studies focusing on the relationship between telomeres, DNA repair processes, and nuclear organization have revealed that the disruption of motor proteins or microtubules, which typically mediate the directed motion of cargo, disrupts the random mobility of damaged DNA. These findings define a new biological paradox. Here, I define this as the damaged DNA mobility paradox, describe how it uncovers key gaps in knowledge, and highlight key questions to help guide us toward paradox resolution.

摘要

真核生物基因组在细胞核内呈非随机排列。尽管基因组存在这种有序的空间组织,但受损的DNA在核空间内的随机移动性却有所增加。这种增加的随机移动被认为通过促进同源性搜索、使靶向修复有利的核区域或从抑制修复的位置释放损伤来促进DNA修复。最近关注端粒、DNA修复过程和核组织之间关系的研究表明,通常介导货物定向运动的运动蛋白或微管的破坏会扰乱受损DNA的随机移动性。这些发现定义了一个新的生物学悖论。在此,我将其定义为受损DNA移动性悖论,描述它如何揭示知识上的关键空白,并突出关键问题以帮助引导我们解决这一悖论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a0/5869915/a64f9190a4fb/fgene-09-00095-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a0/5869915/3e4cfbb64445/fgene-09-00095-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a0/5869915/a64f9190a4fb/fgene-09-00095-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a0/5869915/3e4cfbb64445/fgene-09-00095-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a0/5869915/a64f9190a4fb/fgene-09-00095-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Defining the Damaged DNA Mobility Paradox as Revealed by the Study of Telomeres, DSBs, Microtubules and Motors.端粒、双链断裂、微管和马达研究揭示的受损DNA迁移悖论的定义
Front Genet. 2018 Mar 20;9:95. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00095. eCollection 2018.
2
Corrigendum: Defining the Damaged DNA Mobility Paradox as Revealed by the Study of Telomeres, DSBs, Microtubules and Motors.勘误:通过端粒、双链断裂、微管和分子马达的研究揭示的受损DNA迁移悖论的定义。
Front Genet. 2018 Apr 30;9:157. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00157. eCollection 2018.
3
Nuclear microtubule filaments mediate non-linear directional motion of chromatin and promote DNA repair.核微管丝介导染色质的非线性定向运动,并促进 DNA 修复。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 2;9(1):2567. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05009-7.
4
Mobility and Repair of Damaged DNA: Random or Directed?DNA 损伤的移动和修复:随机还是定向?
Trends Cell Biol. 2020 Feb;30(2):144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
5
53BP1 and the LINC Complex Promote Microtubule-Dependent DSB Mobility and DNA Repair.53BP1和LINC复合物促进微管依赖性双链断裂移动及DNA修复。
Cell. 2015 Nov 5;163(4):880-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.057.
6
Help or hindrance: how do microtubule-based forces contribute to genome damage and repair?助力还是阻碍:基于微管的力如何影响基因组损伤与修复?
Curr Genet. 2020 Apr;66(2):303-311. doi: 10.1007/s00294-019-01033-2. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
7
DSB (Im)mobility and DNA repair compartmentalization in mammalian cells.哺乳动物细胞中 DSB(非)流动性和 DNA 修复区室化。
J Mol Biol. 2015 Feb 13;427(3):652-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
8
The influence of heterochromatin on DNA double strand break repair: Getting the strong, silent type to relax.异染色质对 DNA 双链断裂修复的影响:让沉默的强势者放松。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2010 Dec 10;9(12):1273-82. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
9
Multiple kinesins induce tension for smooth cargo transport.多种驱动蛋白诱导张力以实现平滑货物运输。
Elife. 2019 Oct 31;8:e50974. doi: 10.7554/eLife.50974.
10
Nuclear Actin and Actin-Binding Proteins in DNA Repair.核纤层蛋白和 DNA 修复中的肌动蛋白结合蛋白。
Trends Cell Biol. 2019 Jun;29(6):462-476. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer Cells Upregulate Tau to Gain Resistance to DNA Damaging Agents.癌细胞上调tau蛋白以获得对DNA损伤剂的抗性。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 24;15(1):116. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010116.
2
Paternal grandmother's smoking in pregnancy is associated with extreme aversion to bitter taste in their grandchildren.祖母在孕期吸烟与孙辈对苦味的极度厌恶有关。
Environ Epigenet. 2022 Feb 16;8(1):dvac003. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvac003. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of High- and Low-LET Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Break Processing in Living Cells.

本文引用的文献

1
Assays to Study Repair of Inducible DNA Double-Strand Breaks at Telomeres.研究端粒处可诱导性DNA双链断裂修复的实验方法。
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1672:375-385. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7306-4_26.
2
Microtubule dynamics drive enhanced chromatin motion and mobilize telomeres in response to DNA damage.微管动力学驱动染色质运动增强,并在DNA损伤时动员端粒。
Mol Biol Cell. 2017 Jun 15;28(12):1701-1711. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E16-12-0846. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
3
Genome-wide mapping of long-range contacts unveils clustering of DNA double-strand breaks at damaged active genes.
比较高 LET 和低 LET 辐射诱导的活细胞中 DNA 双链断裂的处理。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Sep 9;21(18):6602. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186602.
4
Intolerance of loud sounds in childhood: Is there an intergenerational association with grandmaternal smoking in pregnancy?儿童对巨响不耐受:与祖母在怀孕期间吸烟有关吗?
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0229323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229323. eCollection 2020.
5
Integrative genomic analysis identifies associations of molecular alterations to APOBEC and BRCA1/2 mutational signatures in breast cancer.整合基因组分析鉴定了乳腺癌中 APOBEC 和 BRCA1/2 突变特征的分子改变与分子改变之间的关联。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019 Aug;7(8):e810. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.810. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
6
Investigating Possible Trans/Intergenerational Associations With Obesity in Young Adults Using an Exposome Approach.使用暴露组方法研究年轻成年人肥胖可能的跨代/代际关联。
Front Genet. 2019 Apr 5;10:314. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00314. eCollection 2019.
7
A role of the 53BP1 protein in genome protection: structural and functional characteristics of 53BP1-dependent DNA repair.53BP1蛋白在基因组保护中的作用:依赖53BP1的DNA修复的结构和功能特征
Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Apr 17;11(8):2488-2511. doi: 10.18632/aging.101917.
全基因组范围内长程接触图谱揭示了受损活性基因处DNA双链断裂的聚集情况。
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017 Apr;24(4):353-361. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3387. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
4
Organizing DNA repair in the nucleus: DSBs hit the road.在细胞核中组织DNA修复:双链断裂踏上征程。
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2017 Jun;46:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
5
Chromatin organization and dynamics in double-strand break repair.双链断裂修复中的染色质组织与动力学
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2017 Apr;43:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
6
Temporal and Spatial Uncoupling of DNA Double Strand Break Repair Pathways within Mammalian Heterochromatin.哺乳动物异染色质中 DNA 双链断裂修复途径的时空分离。
Mol Cell. 2016 Jul 21;63(2):293-305. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
7
DNA damage signalling targets the kinetochore to promote chromatin mobility.DNA 损伤信号靶向动粒以促进染色质的流动性。
Nat Cell Biol. 2016 Mar;18(3):281-90. doi: 10.1038/ncb3308. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
8
53BP1 and the LINC Complex Promote Microtubule-Dependent DSB Mobility and DNA Repair.53BP1和LINC复合物促进微管依赖性双链断裂移动及DNA修复。
Cell. 2015 Nov 5;163(4):880-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.057.
9
Heterochromatic breaks move to the nuclear periphery to continue recombinational repair.异染色质断裂移至核周边以继续重组修复。
Nat Cell Biol. 2015 Nov;17(11):1401-11. doi: 10.1038/ncb3258. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
10
DNA damage induces nuclear actin filament assembly by Formin -2 and Spire-½ that promotes efficient DNA repair. [corrected].DNA损伤通过Formin-2和Spire-½诱导核肌动蛋白丝组装,从而促进高效的DNA修复。[已修正]
Elife. 2015 Aug 19;4:e07735. doi: 10.7554/eLife.07735.