Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Oncode Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Sep 9;21(18):6602. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186602.
High-linear-energy-transfer (LET) radiation is more lethal than similar doses of low-LET radiation types, probably a result of the condensed energy deposition pattern of high-LET radiation. Here, we compare high-LET α-particle to low-LET X-ray irradiation and monitor double-strand break (DSB) processing. Live-cell microscopy was used to monitor DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), marked by p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1). In addition, the accumulation of the endogenous 53BP1 and replication protein A (RPA) DSB processing proteins was analyzed by immunofluorescence. In contrast to α-particle-induced 53BP1 foci, X-ray-induced foci were resolved quickly and more dynamically as they showed an increase in 53BP1 protein accumulation and size. In addition, the number of individual 53BP1 and RPA foci was higher after X-ray irradiation, while focus intensity was higher after α-particle irradiation. Interestingly, 53BP1 foci induced by α-particles contained multiple RPA foci, suggesting multiple individual resection events, which was not observed after X-ray irradiation. We conclude that high-LET α-particles cause closely interspaced DSBs leading to high local concentrations of repair proteins. Our results point toward a change in DNA damage processing toward DNA end-resection and homologous recombination, possibly due to the depletion of soluble protein in the nucleoplasm. The combination of closely interspaced DSBs and perturbed DNA damage processing could be an explanation for the increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of high-LET α-particles compared to X-ray irradiation.
高线性能量转移(LET)辐射比相似剂量的低 LET 辐射类型更具致命性,这可能是由于高 LET 辐射的凝聚能量沉积模式造成的。在这里,我们将高 LET 的 α 粒子与低 LET 的 X 射线照射进行比较,并监测双链断裂(DSB)的处理过程。活细胞显微镜用于监测 DNA 双链断裂(DSBs),由 p53 结合蛋白 1(53BP1)标记。此外,通过免疫荧光分析内源性 53BP1 和复制蛋白 A(RPA)DSB 处理蛋白的积累。与 α 粒子诱导的 53BP1 焦点相比,X 射线诱导的焦点很快得到解决,并且更具动态性,因为它们显示出 53BP1 蛋白积累和大小的增加。此外,X 射线照射后单个 53BP1 和 RPA 焦点的数量更高,而α粒子照射后焦点强度更高。有趣的是,α 粒子诱导的 53BP1 焦点包含多个 RPA 焦点,表明存在多个单独的切除事件,而 X 射线照射后则没有观察到这种情况。我们得出的结论是,高 LET 的 α 粒子会导致紧密间隔的 DSB,从而导致修复蛋白的局部浓度升高。我们的研究结果表明,DNA 损伤处理方式发生了变化,向 DNA 末端切除和同源重组转变,这可能是由于核质中可溶性蛋白的耗竭所致。紧密间隔的 DSB 和 DNA 损伤处理的扰动可能是高 LET α 粒子与 X 射线照射相比相对生物效应(RBE)增加的原因。