• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经闭孔吊带术:手工吊带与商业吊带的功能结果和生活质量。

Functional outcomes and quality of life after transobturatory slings: hand - made vs. commercial slings.

机构信息

Departamento de Urologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Departamento de Urologia, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Int Braz J Urol. 2018 May-Jun;44(3):543-549. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0524.

DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0524
PMID:29617084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5996797/
Abstract

Surgical correction is the most efficient treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and transobturator sling (TO) has optimal results. The high cost of commercially available sling kits makes it difficult the access in most Brazilian public health services. Hand-made polypropylene slings, on the other hand, have been previously reported. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of commercial vs. hand-made polypropylene mesh slings. Data from 57 women who underwent consecutive TO sling surgery to treat SUI were pros-pectively collected between 2012 and 2014, and divided in two groups for further comparison. In Group-1, 31 women underwent surgery with commercial slings. In Group-2, 26 women underwent hand-made polypropylene slings. Women were compared according to epidemiological data, perioperative evaluation, quality of life, urodynamic study, cure and complication rates. Results were objectively (stress test with Valsalva maneuver, with at least 200mL vesical repletion) and subjectively evaluated by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement(PGI-I), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and ICIQ-SF. Success was defined as PGI-I, VAS and negative stress test. Group-1 (n=31) and Group-2 (n=26) had a mean age of 60 vs. 58years (p=0.386). All de-mographic data were similar. The mean VLPP was 75.6cmH2O vs. 76.6cmH2O (p=0.88). The mean follow-up was 24.3 vs. 21.5months (p=0.96). Success rates were 74.2% vs. 80.2% (p=0.556), with ICIQ-SF variation of 12.6 vs.15.5 (p=0.139) and PGI-I of 71% vs. 80% (p=0.225). There was only one major complication (urethrovaginal fistula in Group-1). In conclusion, handmade and commercial slings have similar effectiveness and safety. The manufacture technique has important key-points stated in the present manuscript.

摘要

手术矫正(SUI)是治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)最有效的方法,经闭孔悬吊带(TO)具有最佳效果。商业上可用的吊带套件价格昂贵,这使得大多数巴西公共卫生服务机构都难以获得。另一方面,此前已经报道过手工聚丙烯吊带。本研究的目的是比较商业和手工聚丙烯网片吊带的有效性和安全性。2012 年至 2014 年期间,前瞻性收集了 57 例连续接受 TO 吊带手术治疗 SUI 的女性患者的数据,并分为两组进行进一步比较。在第 1 组中,31 名女性接受了商业吊带手术。在第 2 组中,26 名女性接受了手工聚丙烯吊带手术。根据人口统计学数据、围手术期评估、生活质量、尿动力学研究、治愈率和并发症发生率对女性进行比较。结果通过压力测试(Valsalva 动作,膀胱充盈至少 200mL)和患者总体印象改善(PGI-I)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和国际尿失禁咨询委员会尿失禁问卷简表(ICIQ-SF)进行客观和主观评估。成功定义为 PGI-I、VAS 和压力测试阴性。第 1 组(n=31)和第 2 组(n=26)的平均年龄分别为 60 岁和 58 岁(p=0.386)。所有人口统计学数据均相似。平均 VLPP 分别为 75.6cmH2O 和 76.6cmH2O(p=0.88)。平均随访时间分别为 24.3 个月和 21.5 个月(p=0.96)。成功率分别为 74.2%和 80.2%(p=0.556),ICIQ-SF 变化分别为 12.6 和 15.5(p=0.139),PGI-I 分别为 71%和 80%(p=0.225)。只有 1 例严重并发症(第 1 组中出现尿道阴道瘘)。总之,手工和商业吊带具有相似的效果和安全性。本研究提出了制造技术的重要关键点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/5996797/04dd8e6aa9d8/1677-5538-ibju-44-03-0543-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/5996797/04dd8e6aa9d8/1677-5538-ibju-44-03-0543-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/5996797/04dd8e6aa9d8/1677-5538-ibju-44-03-0543-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Functional outcomes and quality of life after transobturatory slings: hand - made vs. commercial slings.经闭孔吊带术:手工吊带与商业吊带的功能结果和生活质量。
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 May-Jun;44(3):543-549. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0524.
2
A new validated score for detecting patient-reported success on postoperative ICIQ-SF: a novel two-stage analysis from two large RCT cohorts.一种用于检测患者报告的术后ICIQ-SF成功情况的新验证评分:来自两个大型随机对照试验队列的新型两阶段分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jan;28(1):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3070-0. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
3
[Mini-sling versus transobturator sling: Efficiency and morbidity].[迷你吊带与经闭孔吊带:疗效与并发症]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Nov;46(10-11):673-680. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
4
A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.经阴道单切口和经闭孔尿道中段吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照研究:12 个月随访结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
5
Comparison of single-incision mini-slings (Ajust) and standard transobturator midurethral slings (Align) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence: A 1-year follow-up.单切口迷你吊带(Ajust)与标准经闭孔尿道中段吊带(Align)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:1年随访
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;54(6):726-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.007.
6
Comparison of transobturator tape surgery using commercial and hand made slings in women with stress urinary incontinence.压力性尿失禁女性中使用商用吊带和自制吊带行经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术的比较。
Urol J. 2015 Apr 29;12(2):2090-4.
7
Titanized Transobturator Sling Placement for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence Using an Inside-out Single-incision Technique: Minimum 12-Months Follow-up Study.采用由内向外单切口技术植入钛化经闭孔吊带治疗男性压力性尿失禁:至少12个月的随访研究
Urology. 2018 May;115:144-150. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
8
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of surgical procedures utilizing autologous fascial and transobturator slings in patients with stress urinary incontinence.利用自体筋膜吊带和经闭孔吊带治疗压力性尿失禁患者的手术疗效和安全性比较。
J Reprod Med. 2013 Jan-Feb;58(1-2):19-24.
9
Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.男性尿道悬吊带术与人工尿道括约肌治疗尿失禁的并发症发生率比较:基于美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库的全国多机构分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1571-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1347-3. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision mini-slings (MiniArc) versus transobturator mid-urethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.单切口迷你吊带(MiniArc)与经闭孔中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(14):e0283. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010283.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of synthetic slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: Number 2 - 2025.合成吊带在女性压力性尿失禁治疗中的应用:第2部分 - 2025年
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2025 Mar 17;47. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2025FPS2. eCollection 2025.
2
Incontinence outcomes in women undergoing retropubic mid-urethral sling: a retrospective cohort study comparing Safyre™ and handmade sling.经耻骨后尿道中段吊带术的女性患者尿失禁结局:Safyre™吊带与手工吊带的回顾性队列研究比较。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jul-Aug;48(4):649-659. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0646.
3
Urethrovaginal fistula repair with or without concurrent fascial sling placement: A retrospective review.

本文引用的文献

1
A populational-based survey on the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors of urinary incontinence in older adults-results from the "SABE STUDY".一项基于人群的老年人尿失禁患病率、发病率及危险因素调查——“巴西老年健康与衰老研究”结果
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):466-477. doi: 10.1002/nau.23331. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
2
Comparison of transobturator tape surgery using commercial and hand made slings in women with stress urinary incontinence.压力性尿失禁女性中使用商用吊带和自制吊带行经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术的比较。
Urol J. 2015 Apr 29;12(2):2090-4.
3
Long-term durability of the distal urethral polypropylene sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: minimum 11-year followup.
伴或不伴同期筋膜吊带置入的尿道阴道瘘修补术:一项回顾性研究
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 May;15(5):E276-E280. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6786.
长期聚丙烯远端尿道吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的耐用性:最少 11 年随访。
J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1822-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.033. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
4
A prospective randomized controlled trial of the transobturator tape and tissue fixation mini-sling in patients with stress urinary incontinence: 5-year results.经闭孔尿道中段吊带和组织固定迷你吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的前瞻性随机对照研究:5 年结果。
J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2564. Epub 2012 May 15.
5
Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling.比较使用商业和手工聚丙烯吊带的吊带技术的结果。
Int Braz J Urol. 2011 Jul-Aug;37(4):519-27. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382011000400012.
6
Managing complications of slings.处理吊带并发症。
Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Jul;21(4):291-6. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283476eb5.
7
Bladder outlet obstruction after pubovaginal fascial sling.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Feb;20(2):201-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0759-8. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
8
Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice.女性压力性尿失禁治疗中的评估与结局指标:国际尿控协会(IUGA)研究与临床实践指南
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jan;19(1):5-33. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0495-5. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
9
Urinary incontinence in women: Direct costs of routine care.女性尿失禁:常规护理的直接成本。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):596.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.04.029. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
10
The analysis of infection after polypropylene mesh repair of abdominal wall hernia.腹壁疝聚丙烯补片修补术后感染的分析
World J Surg. 2006 Dec;30(12):2270-8; discussion 2279-80. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0130-5.