• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用未经经验丰富的评定者进行 DSM-5 人格功能水平评定的人格组织结构访谈。

Using the Structured Interview of Personality Organization for DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Rating Performed by Inexperienced Raters.

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Milano-Bicocca , Milano , Italy.

b Personality Disorders Lab, Parma-Milan , Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2018 Nov-Dec;100(6):621-629. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1448985. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2018.1448985
PMID:29617170
Abstract

We argue that clinical information related to an object-relations model of personality pathology can be used by untrained and clinically inexperienced students to rate personality-disordered patients on the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). To do so, 73 clinically inexperienced undergraduate students were asked to assess personality functioning of 10 female inpatients using the LPFS from audio recordings of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO). LPFS ratings showed acceptable interrater reliability. Moreover, LPFS ratings were significantly associated with external measures of severity of personality pathology (number of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders) as assessed by experienced clinicians. Finally, the students' ratings were also associated with the level of personality organization as measured by experienced clinicians using the STIPO. Our findings confirm that untrained raters can reliably assess personality pathology by rating the LPFS based on material from the STIPO. Implications related to the use of the STIPO as a tool for the assessment of personality pathology according to the DSM-5 Alternative model are discussed.

摘要

我们认为,与客体关系人格病理学模型相关的临床信息可以被未经训练且缺乏临床经验的学生用于根据人格功能水平量表(LPFS)对人格障碍患者进行评分。为此,73 名缺乏临床经验的本科生被要求使用人格组织结构访谈(STIPO)的音频记录来评估 10 名女性住院患者的人格功能。LPFS 评分显示出可接受的评分者间信度。此外,LPFS 评分与经验丰富的临床医生评估的人格病理学严重程度的外部测量(DSM-IV-TR 人格障碍的数量)显著相关。最后,学生的评分也与经验丰富的临床医生使用 STIPO 测量的人格组织水平相关。我们的研究结果证实,未经训练的评分者可以通过根据 STIPO 的材料对 LPFS 进行评分来可靠地评估人格病理学。还讨论了根据 DSM-5 替代模型将 STIPO 用作人格病理学评估工具的相关意义。

相似文献

1
Using the Structured Interview of Personality Organization for DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Rating Performed by Inexperienced Raters.使用未经经验丰富的评定者进行 DSM-5 人格功能水平评定的人格组织结构访谈。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Nov-Dec;100(6):621-629. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1448985. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
2
Assessing DSM-5 level of personality functioning from videotaped clinical interviews: a pilot study with untrained and clinically inexperienced students.通过录像临床访谈评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)人格功能水平:一项针对未经培训且缺乏临床经验学生的试点研究。
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(4):397-409. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.852563. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
3
Comparison of the Structured DSM-5 Clinical Interview for the Level of Personality Functioning Scale With the Structured Interview of Personality Organization.人格功能水平结构化 DSM-5 临床访谈与人格组织结构化访谈的比较。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Nov-Dec;100(6):642-649. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1489257.
4
Examining criterion a: DSM-5 level of personality functioning as assessed through life story interviews.检查标准 a:通过生活故事访谈评估的 DSM-5 人格功能水平。
Personal Disord. 2019 May;10(3):224-234. doi: 10.1037/per0000321. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
5
Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module i: Level of Personality Functioning Scale.DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型模块 i:人格功能水平评定量表的结构性临床访谈的评定者间信度。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Nov-Dec;100(6):630-641. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
6
Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire for the Assessment of the DSM-5 level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-BF).用于评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格功能水平量表(LPFS)的简短自评问卷的编制与初步心理测量学评估:LPFS简表(LPFS-BF)
Personal Disord. 2016 Apr;7(2):192-7. doi: 10.1037/per0000159. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
7
Reliability and validity of the German version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO).《人格组织结构访谈德语版(STIPO)的信度和效度》。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Aug 13;13:210. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-210.
8
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization-Revised (STIPO-R).《人格组织修订版结构访谈中文版(STIPO-R)的信度和效度》。
Psychol Assess. 2024 Sep;36(9):e27-e37. doi: 10.1037/pas0001324.
9
Mentalization and criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders: Results from a clinical and nonclinical sample.心理化与人格障碍替代模型的标准 A:来自临床和非临床样本的结果。
Personal Disord. 2020 May;11(3):191-201. doi: 10.1037/per0000356. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
10
Expanding the Validity of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale Observer Report and Self-Report Versions Across Psychodynamic and Interpersonal Paradigms.扩展人格功能水平量表观察报告和自我报告版本在精神分析和人际范式中的有效性。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Nov-Dec;100(6):571-580. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1475394. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) according to DSM-5 revision criteria.根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订标准,人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的有效性、可靠性和临床实用性。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Oct;24(3):319-340. doi: 10.1002/wps.21339.
2
Personality functioning in bipolar 1 disorder and borderline personality disorder.双相 1 障碍和边缘型人格障碍的人格功能。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 25;24(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06297-8.
3
Differences in personality functioning impairment in mood, anxiety, and personality disorders: a cluster analysis.
心境、焦虑和人格障碍患者人格功能损害的差异:聚类分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 May 4;22(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03958-4.
4
Clinical Associations Between Severity of Impulsivity, Psychiatric Morbidity, Dysfunctional Defences and Personality Disorder: A Comparative Study With Axis-I Disorders.冲动性严重程度、精神疾病发病率、功能失调性防御与人格障碍之间的临床关联:与轴I障碍的比较研究
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Dec;17(6):339-348. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20200603.
5
The Construct Validity of the ICD-11 Severity of Personality Dysfunction Under Scrutiny of Object-Relations Theory.在客体关系理论审视下《国际疾病分类第11版》人格功能障碍严重程度的结构效度
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 22;12:648427. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.648427. eCollection 2021.
6
Three Dimensional Approaches to Personality Disorders: a Review on Personality Functioning, Personality Structure, and Personality Organization.三维人格障碍方法:人格功能、人格结构和人格组织的综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2021 Jun 28;23(7):45. doi: 10.1007/s11920-021-01250-y.
7
A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型研究的简要但全面的综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Aug 13;21(9):92. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z.
8
Personality functioning in anxiety disorders.焦虑障碍中的人格功能。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 14;18(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1870-0.