• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与稳定型心绞痛患者术前使用β受体阻滞剂与更好的心血管生存相关。

CABG and Preoperative use of Beta-Blockers in Patients with Stable Angina are Associated with Better Cardiovascular Survival.

作者信息

Dayan Victor, Perez Diego, Silva Eloisa, Soca Gerardo, Estigarribia Jorge

机构信息

Instituto Nacional de Cirugía Cardíaca, Montevideo, Uruguay.

出版信息

Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jan-Feb;33(1):47-53. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0138.

DOI:10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0138
PMID:29617501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5873784/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In contrast to unstable angina, optimal therapy in patients with stable angina is debated. Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with stable angina scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass grafts and the effect of preoperative use of beta-blockers. Overall and cardiovascular survivals were our primary outcome. Operative mortality and postoperative complications along with subgroup analysis of diabetic patients were our secondary outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of patients with stable angina scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass grafts was included. Pre- and postoperative variables were extracted from the institution database. Survival was obtained from the National Registry.

RESULTS

We included 282 patients with stable angina, with a mean age of 65.6±9.5 years. 26.6% were female and 38.7% had diabetes. Three-vessel disease was present in 76.6% of patients. Previous beta-blocker treatment was evident in 69.9% of patients. 10-year overall survival in the whole population was 60.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.3-70.7%). Operative mortality during the study period was 3.5%. Patients with preoperative use of beta-blocker therapy had better overall survival (9.0 years, 95%CI: 8.6-9.5) than those without treatment (7.9 years, 95%CI: 7.1-8.8 years; P=0.048). Predictors for overall survival were: hypertension, diabetes, and age. Predictors for cardiovascular survival in diabetic patients were: beta-blocker use, gender, and age.

CONCLUSION

Coronary artery bypass grafts surgery in patients with stable angina carries low operative mortality, postoperative complications, and excellent long-term cardiovascular survival. The preoperative use of beta-blockers in diabetic patients is associated with better cardiovascular survival after coronary artery bypass grafts.

摘要

目的

与不稳定型心绞痛不同,稳定型心绞痛患者的最佳治疗方法存在争议。我们的目的是评估计划进行单纯冠状动脉搭桥术的稳定型心绞痛患者的预后以及术前使用β受体阻滞剂的效果。总体生存率和心血管生存率是我们的主要结局指标。手术死亡率、术后并发症以及糖尿病患者的亚组分析是我们的次要结局指标。

方法

纳入对计划进行单纯冠状动脉搭桥术的稳定型心绞痛患者的回顾性评估。术前和术后变量从机构数据库中提取。生存率从国家登记处获得。

结果

我们纳入了282例稳定型心绞痛患者,平均年龄为65.6±9.5岁。26.6%为女性,38.7%患有糖尿病。76.6%的患者存在三支血管病变。69.9%的患者曾接受过β受体阻滞剂治疗。整个人群的10年总体生存率为60.5%(95%置信区间[CI]:50.3 - 70.7%)。研究期间的手术死亡率为3.5%。术前使用β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者总体生存率更好(9.0年,95%CI:8.6 - 9.5),优于未接受治疗的患者(7.9年,95%CI:7.1 - 8.8年;P = 0.048)。总体生存的预测因素为:高血压、糖尿病和年龄。糖尿病患者心血管生存的预测因素为:β受体阻滞剂的使用、性别和年龄。

结论

稳定型心绞痛患者进行冠状动脉搭桥手术的手术死亡率低、术后并发症少,且长期心血管生存率良好。糖尿病患者术前使用β受体阻滞剂与冠状动脉搭桥术后更好的心血管生存相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59fa/5873784/30767fe30219/rbccv-33-01-0047-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59fa/5873784/491f7a78cd03/rbccv-33-01-0047-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59fa/5873784/30767fe30219/rbccv-33-01-0047-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59fa/5873784/491f7a78cd03/rbccv-33-01-0047-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59fa/5873784/30767fe30219/rbccv-33-01-0047-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
CABG and Preoperative use of Beta-Blockers in Patients with Stable Angina are Associated with Better Cardiovascular Survival.冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与稳定型心绞痛患者术前使用β受体阻滞剂与更好的心血管生存相关。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jan-Feb;33(1):47-53. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0138.
2
Preoperative beta-blocker use and mortality and morbidity following CABG surgery in North America.北美地区冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术前使用β受体阻滞剂与术后死亡率和发病率的关系
JAMA. 2002 May 1;287(17):2221-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.17.2221.
3
Preoperative β-blocker use in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: national database analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术中术前β受体阻滞剂的使用:国家数据库分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1320-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2356.
4
Predictors, Trends, and Outcomes (Among Older Patients ≥65 Years of Age) Associated With Beta-Blocker Use in Patients With Stable Angina Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the NCDR Registry.与接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的稳定型心绞痛患者中使用β受体阻滞剂相关的预测因素、趋势和结局(年龄≥65 岁的老年患者):来自 NCDR 注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 22;9(16):1639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.05.048.
5
Effects of Preoperative β-Blocker Use on Clinical Outcomes after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Report from the Japanese Cardiovascular Surgery Database.术前β受体阻滞剂使用对冠状动脉旁路移植术后临床结局的影响:来自日本心血管外科学数据库的报告。
Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan;124(1):45-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000901.
6
On-Pump Beating/Non-Beating CABG in Stable Angina Have Similar Outcomes.在稳定型心绞痛患者中,体外循环下不停跳/停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术的疗效相似。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Mar-Apr;33(2):183-188. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0161.
7
Short-term effects of preoperative beta-blocker use for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.择期冠状动脉旁路移植术术前使用β受体阻滞剂的短期效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;155(2):620-629.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
β-blocker Therapy is Not Associated with Reductions in Angina or Cardiovascular Events After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Insights from the IMAGINE Trial.β受体阻滞剂治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术后心绞痛或心血管事件的减少无关:来自IMAGINE试验的见解。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2015 Jun;29(3):277-85. doi: 10.1007/s10557-015-6600-y.
9
Efficacy of Long-Term β-Blocker Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Long-Term Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.长期β受体阻滞剂治疗对冠状动脉旁路移植术后长期预后二级预防的疗效。
Circulation. 2015 Jun 23;131(25):2194-201. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014209. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
10
Survival at 15 to 18 years after coronary bypass surgery for angina in women.女性心绞痛患者冠状动脉搭桥手术后15至18年的生存率。
Circulation. 1993 Nov;88(5 Pt 2):II71-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Cardioprotective Medication Use in Coronary Heart Disease Patients in South America: Systematic review and Meta-Analysis.南美地区冠心病患者中心血管保护药物的使用情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Glob Heart. 2022 Jun 8;17(1):37. doi: 10.5334/gh.1124. eCollection 2022.
2
8-Isoprostanes and Asymmetric Dimethylarginine as Predictors of Mortality in Patients Following Coronary Bypass Surgery: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.8-异前列腺素和不对称二甲基精氨酸作为冠状动脉搭桥术后患者死亡率的预测指标:一项长期随访研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 4;11(1):246. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010246.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical Treatment and Revascularization Options in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Disease.2 型糖尿病合并冠心病患者的治疗和血运重建选择。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):985-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.021.
2
Prognosis and Complications of Diabetic Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.接受单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术的糖尿病患者的预后和并发症
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Feb;31(1):7-14. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20160002.
3
CABG Versus PCI: Greater Benefit in Long-Term Outcomes With Multiple Arterial Bypass Grafting.
冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:多支动脉搭桥术在长期预后方面具有更大益处。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 29;66(13):1417-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.060.
4
Revascularisation versus medical treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis.稳定性冠心病患者的血运重建与药物治疗:网状荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2014 Jun 23;348:g3859. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3859.
5
Preoperative β-blocker use in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: national database analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术中术前β受体阻滞剂的使用:国家数据库分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1320-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2356.
6
Myocardial protection with prophylactic oral metoprolol during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: evaluation by troponin I.冠状动脉搭桥手术期间预防性口服美托洛尔的心肌保护作用:通过肌钙蛋白I进行评估
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2013 Oct-Dec;28(4):449-54. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130074.
7
Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies.血运重建策略的比较效果。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 19;366(16):1467-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110717. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
8
Controversies in cardiovascular medicine: Chronic stable coronary artery disease: drugs vs. revascularization.心血管医学争议:慢性稳定型冠状动脉疾病:药物治疗与血运重建。
Eur Heart J. 2010 Mar;31(5):530-41. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp605. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
9
A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease.2型糖尿病与冠状动脉疾病治疗的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 11;360(24):2503-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805796. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
10
Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysis.非急性冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:20年定量综述与网状Meta分析
Lancet. 2009 Mar 14;373(9667):911-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60319-6.