Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg,
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Caries Res. 2018;52(6):447-453. doi: 10.1159/000487815. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) may be useful as a supportive antimicrobial measure for caries-active subjects. In this study, the antimicrobial efficacy of aPDT with a phenalen-1-one photosensitizer was evaluated in a novel in vitro biofilm model comprising Actinomyces naeslundii, Actinomyces odontolyticus, and Streptococcus mutans and was compared to chlorhexidine. The proposed biofilm model allows high-throughput screening for antimicrobial efficacy while exhibiting a differentiated response to different antimicrobial approaches. While chlorhexidine 0.2% showed a reduction of ≈4 log10 for all species, aPDT led to a more pronounced reduction of S. mutans (2.8 log10) than of Actinomyces spp. (1.2 or 1.3 log10). A similar effect was also observed in monospecies biofilms. Therefore, aPDT may be more effective against S. mutans than against Actinomyces spp. when in biofilms, and this antimicrobial approach merits further investigations.
光动力抗菌疗法 (aPDT) 可能有助于作为龋齿活跃个体的辅助抗菌措施。在这项研究中,使用 phenalen-1-one 光敏剂的 aPDT 的抗菌功效在一种新的体外生物膜模型中进行了评估,该模型包含奈瑟氏放线菌、龋齿放线菌和变形链球菌,并与洗必泰进行了比较。所提出的生物膜模型允许高通量筛选抗菌功效,同时对不同的抗菌方法表现出差异化的反应。虽然 0.2%的洗必泰对所有物种的减少约为 4 log10,但 aPDT 导致变形链球菌(2.8 log10)的减少比放线菌属(1.2 或 1.3 log10)更为明显。在单种生物膜中也观察到了类似的效果。因此,在生物膜中,aPDT 对变形链球菌的抗菌效果可能比对放线菌属更有效,这种抗菌方法值得进一步研究。