Cai Leyi, Zhang Yingying, Chen Chunhui, Lou Yiting, Guo Xiaoshan, Wang Jianshun
Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, NO.109, XueYuan West Road, Luheng District, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, NO.109, XueYuan West Road , Luheng District, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Apr 4;13(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0778-1.
Open reduction and internal fixation of pelvic fractures could restore the stability of the pelvic ring, but there were several problems. Minimally invasive closed reduction cannulated screw treatment of pelvic fractures has lots advantages. However, how to insert the cannulated screw safely and effectively to achieve a reliable fixation were still hard for orthopedist. Our aim was to explore the significance of 3D printing technology as a new method for minimally invasive cannulated screw treatment of unstable pelvic fracture.
One hundred thirty-seven patients with unstable pelvic fractures from 2014 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the usage of 3D printing technology for preoperative simulation surgery, they were assigned to 3D printing group (n = 65) and control group (n = 72), respectively. These two groups were assessed in terms of operative time, intraoperative fluoroscopy, postoperative reduction effect, fracture healing time, and follow-up function. The effect of 3D printing technology was evaluated through minimally invasive cannulated screw treatment.
There was no significant difference in these two groups with respect to general conditions, such as age, gender, fracture type, time from injury to operation, injury cause, and combined injury. Length of surgery and average number of fluoroscopies were statistically different for 3D printing group and the control group (p < 0.01), i.e., 58.6 vs. 72.3 min and 29.3 vs. 37 min, respectively. Using the Matta radiological scoring systems, the reduction was scored excellent in 21/65 cases (32.3%) and good in 30/65 cases (46.2%) for the 3D printing group, versus 22/72 cases (30.6%) scored as excellent and 36/72 cases (50%) as good for the control group. On the other hand, using the Majeed functional scoring criteria, there were 27/65 (41.5%) excellent and 26/65 (40%) good cases for the 3D printing group in comparison to 30/72 (41.7%) and 28/72 (38.9%) cases for the control group, respectively. This suggests no significant difference between these two groups about the function outcomes.
Full reduction and proper fixation of the pelvic ring and reconstruction of anatomical morphology are of great significance to patients' early functional exercise and for the reduction of long-term complications. This retrospective study has demonstrated the 3D printing technology as a potential approach for improving the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic fractures.
The study was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number: ChiCTR-TRC-17012798, trial registration date: 26 Sept. 2017.
骨盆骨折切开复位内固定术可恢复骨盆环的稳定性,但存在诸多问题。骨盆骨折微创闭合复位空心螺钉治疗具有诸多优点。然而,如何安全有效地置入空心螺钉以实现可靠固定,对于骨科医生来说仍然困难。我们的目的是探讨3D打印技术作为不稳定骨盆骨折微创空心螺钉治疗新方法的意义。
回顾性分析2014年至2016年137例不稳定骨盆骨折患者。根据术前是否使用3D打印技术进行模拟手术,将患者分为3D打印组(n = 65)和对照组(n = 72)。对两组患者的手术时间、术中透视次数、术后复位效果、骨折愈合时间及随访功能进行评估。通过微创空心螺钉治疗评估3D打印技术的效果。
两组患者在年龄、性别、骨折类型、受伤至手术时间、受伤原因及合并伤等一般情况方面无显著差异。3D打印组与对照组的手术时长及平均透视次数在统计学上有差异(p < 0.01),分别为58.6分钟对72.3分钟和29.3次对37次。采用Matta放射学评分系统,3D打印组65例中有21例(32.3%)复位评为优,30例(46.2%)评为良;对照组72例中有22例(30.6%)评为优,36例(50%)评为良。另一方面,采用Majeed功能评分标准,3D打印组65例中有27例(41.5%)为优,26例(40%)为良;对照组72例中有30例(41.7%)为优,28例(38.9%)为良。这表明两组在功能结果方面无显著差异。
骨盆环的完全复位、恰当固定及解剖形态重建对患者早期功能锻炼及减少远期并发症具有重要意义。这项回顾性研究表明3D打印技术是改善骨盆骨折诊断和治疗的一种潜在方法。
该研究在中国临床试验注册中心进行回顾性注册,注册号:ChiCTR - TRC - 17012798,试验注册日期:2017年9月26日。