Research Department, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Olof Palmes Allé 34, 8200, Aarhus N, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Apr 5;26(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0494-1.
Triage systems are used in emergency medical services to systematically prioritize prehospital resources according to individual patient conditions. Previous studies have shown cases of preventable deaths in emergency medical services even when triage systems are used, indicating a potential undertriage among some conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the triage level among patients diagnosed with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) or peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB).
In a three-year period in Central Denmark Region, all patients hospitalized within 24 h after a 1-1-2 emergency call and who subsequently received either a PPU or a PUB (hereinafter combined and referred to as PPU/PUB) or a First Hour Quintet (FHQ: respiratory failure, stroke, trauma, cardiac chest pain, and cardiac arrest) diagnosis were investigated. A modified Poisson regression was used to estimate the relative risk of receiving the highest and lowest prehospital response level. Also, a linear regression analysis was used to estimate the relative risk of 30-day mortality.
Of 8658 evaluated patients, 263 were diagnosed with PPU/PUB. After adjusting for relevant confounding variables, patients diagnosed with PPU/PUB were less likely to receive ambulance transportation compared to patients diagnosed with stroke, RR = 1.41 (CI: 1.28-1.56); trauma, RR = 1.28 (CI: 1.15-1.42); cardiac chest pain, RR = 1.47 (CI: 1.33-1.62); and cardiac arrest, RR = 1.44 (CI: 1.31-1.42). Among patients diagnosed with PPU/PUB, 6.5% (CI: 3.3-9.7) did not receive ambulance transportation. The proportion of patients not receiving ambulance transportation was higher among patients diagnosed with PPU/PUB compared to patients diagnosed with an FHQ diagnosis. The 30-day mortality rate among patients diagnosed with PPU/PUB was 7.8% (CI: 4.2-11.1). This was lower than the 30-day mortality rate among patients diagnosed with respiratory failure (P = 0.010), stroke (P = 0.001), and cardiac arrest (P < 0.001), but comparable to the 30-day mortality among patients diagnosed with cardiac chest pain (P = 0.080) and trauma (P = 0.281).
Among patients calling 1-1-2, fewer patients diagnosed with PPU/PUB received ambulance transportation than patients diagnosed with FHQ diagnoses, despite a high mortality among patients diagnosed with PPU/PUB.
分诊系统用于紧急医疗服务,根据患者个体情况对院前资源进行系统优先排序。既往研究显示,即使使用分诊系统,仍存在一些可预防的死亡病例,表明某些情况下可能存在分诊不足。本研究旨在调查穿孔性消化性溃疡(PPU)或消化性溃疡出血(PUB)患者的分诊级别。
在丹麦中部地区的三年期间,对所有在 1-1-2 紧急呼叫后 24 小时内住院且随后诊断为 PPU 或 PUB(以下简称 PPU/PUB)或 First Hour Quintet(呼吸衰竭、中风、创伤、心前区疼痛和心搏骤停)的患者进行了调查。采用修正泊松回归估计接受最高和最低院前反应级别的相对风险。还采用线性回归分析估计 30 天死亡率的相对风险。
在评估的 8658 名患者中,有 263 名患者被诊断为 PPU/PUB。在校正相关混杂变量后,与中风、RR=1.41(CI:1.28-1.56)、创伤、RR=1.28(CI:1.15-1.42)、心前区疼痛、RR=1.47(CI:1.33-1.62)和心搏骤停、RR=1.44(CI:1.31-1.42)相比,诊断为 PPU/PUB 的患者更不可能接受救护车转运。在诊断为 PPU/PUB 的患者中,6.5%(CI:3.3-9.7)未接受救护车转运。与诊断为 FHQ 诊断的患者相比,诊断为 PPU/PUB 的患者未接受救护车转运的比例更高。诊断为 PPU/PUB 的患者 30 天死亡率为 7.8%(CI:4.2-11.1)。这低于呼吸衰竭(P=0.010)、中风(P=0.001)和心搏骤停(P<0.001)的 30 天死亡率,但与心前区疼痛(P=0.080)和创伤(P=0.281)的 30 天死亡率相当。
在拨打 1-1-2 的患者中,与诊断为 FHQ 诊断的患者相比,诊断为 PPU/PUB 的患者接受救护车转运的比例较低,尽管诊断为 PPU/PUB 的患者死亡率较高。