Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Public Health Research Institute, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Apr 4;10(435). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai7786.
In clinical trials of two rifamycin antibiotics (rifampin and rifapentine) for treating tuberculosis (TB), patients with cavitary lung lesions did not appear to derive benefit from rifapentine. Rifapentine was found not to outperform rifampin, despite a lower minimum inhibitory concentration against in mouse models of TB. To understand these findings, we have developed a rabbit model of TB that reliably develops lung cavities with features similar to those of patients with pulmonary cavitary TB. After single or multiple doses of rifampin or rifapentine that produced human-equivalent plasma exposures, rabbits were sacrificed at different time points after dosing. We measured site-of-disease drug pharmacokinetics and tissue drug distribution. We used pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling to estimate drug penetration into different types of tubercular lesions. Both drugs penetrated rabbit lung cellular lesions, as well as the fibrotic cavity wall of cavitary lesions (penetration coefficients ≥1 compared to plasma). For the necrotic liquefied material inside cavitary lesions known as caseum (which contains high numbers of bacteria), the penetration coefficient was 1.0 for rifampin but only 0.25 for rifapentine. When estimates of site-of-disease drug PK were substituted into clinical PK/PD models, the relationship between site-of-action exposure and sputum culture conversion was significant ( < 10). We propose that poor penetration of rifapentine into lung cavitary lesions explains, in part, why rifapentine doses required to improve treatment outcomes in two phase 2 clinical trials were four times higher in TB patients with large cavities compared to TB patients without cavitary lung disease.
在两项利福霉素类抗生素(利福平、利福喷汀)治疗结核病(TB)的临床试验中,有空腔性肺病变的患者似乎并未从利福喷汀中获益。尽管在结核分枝杆菌小鼠模型中,利福喷汀对最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的要求低于利福平,但它并未表现出优于利福平的疗效。为了理解这些发现,我们开发了一种可靠地建立具有与空洞性肺结核患者相似特征的肺空洞的兔结核病模型。在单次或多次给予产生与人血浆暴露等效的利福平或利福喷汀剂量后,在给药后的不同时间点处死兔子。我们测量了病变部位的药物药代动力学和组织药物分布。我们使用药代动力学-药效学(PK/PD)模型来估计药物穿透不同类型结核病变的能力。两种药物都能穿透兔肺细胞病变,以及空洞病变的纤维性腔壁(穿透系数≥1,与血浆相比)。对于空洞病变中称为干酪样坏死液化物质(其中含有大量细菌),利福平的穿透系数为 1.0,而利福喷汀仅为 0.25。当将病变部位的药物 PK 估计值代入临床 PK/PD 模型时,作用部位暴露与痰培养转换之间的关系具有统计学意义(<10)。我们提出,利福喷汀在肺部空洞病变中的穿透性差部分解释了为什么在有大空洞的结核病患者中,提高两项 2 期临床试验治疗结果所需的利福喷汀剂量比没有空洞性肺病的结核病患者高四倍。