Suppr超能文献

初治类风湿关节炎患者使用传统合成改善病情抗风湿药的疗效与安全性:一项网状Meta分析

The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Cai Weiyan, Gu Youyi, Cui Huanqin, Cao Yinyin, Wang Xiaoliang, Yao Yi, Wang Mingyu

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.

Department of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2018 Mar 21;9:138. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00138. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The mainstream medications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs), which mostly are methotrexate (MTX), and biologic agents such as adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab (CZP), etanercept (ETN), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), and tocilizumab (TCZ). This network meta-analysis was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of the medications above and interventions combining cDMARDs and biologic agents for patients with RA. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes concerning efficacy and safety were evaluated utilizing odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (). The outcomes of efficacy would be evaluated through remission and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) scores. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank each treatment on each index. A total of 20 RCTs with 9,047 patients were included, and the efficacy and safety of the concerning interventions for RA were evaluated. Compared with cDMARDs alone, TCZ+MTX, ETN+MTX, IFX+MTX, TCZ, and ADA+MTX showed significant statistical advantage on ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70. Apart from that, as for remission, TCZ+MTX, IFX+MTX, TCZ, and CZP+MTX performed better compared to cDMARDs alone. The SUCRA ranking also indicated that TCZ+MTX was the intervention with best ranking in the entire four efficacy indexes followed by ETX+MTX and IFX+MTX. However, there was no obvious difference among these medications compared with cDMARDs when it comes to safety, which need more specific studies on that. TCZ+MTX was potentially the most recommended combination of medications for RA due to its good performance in all outcomes of efficacy. ETX+MTX and IFX+MTX, which also performed well, could be introduced as alternative treatments. However, considering the adverse events, the treatments concerning should be introduced with caution.

摘要

类风湿关节炎(RA)的主流药物包括传统改善病情抗风湿药(cDMARDs),其中大多是甲氨蝶呤(MTX),以及生物制剂,如阿达木单抗(ADA)、赛妥珠单抗(CZP)、依那西普(ETN)、戈利木单抗(GOL)、英夫利昔单抗(IFX)和托珠单抗(TCZ)。这项网状Meta分析旨在评估上述药物以及cDMARDs与生物制剂联合干预措施对RA患者的疗效和安全性。对PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov进行了系统检索,以查找符合条件的随机对照试验(RCTs)。利用比值比(ORs)和95%可信区间()评估疗效和安全性相关结果。疗效结果将通过缓解情况和美国风湿病学会(ACR)评分进行评估。计算累积排名曲线下面积(SUCRA)以对各指标上的每种治疗进行排名。共纳入20项RCTs,涉及9047例患者,并评估了RA相关干预措施的疗效和安全性。与单独使用cDMARDs相比,TCZ+MTX、ETN+MTX、IFX+MTX、TCZ和ADA+MTX在ACR20、ACR50和ACR70方面显示出显著的统计学优势。除此之外,在缓解方面,与单独使用cDMARDs相比,TCZ+MTX、IFX+MTX、TCZ和CZP+MTX表现更好。SUCRA排名还表明,TCZ+MTX是在所有四个疗效指标中排名最佳的干预措施,其次是ETX+MTX和IFX+MTX。然而,在安全性方面,与cDMARDs相比,这些药物之间没有明显差异,但这方面需要更具体的研究。由于TCZ+MTX在所有疗效结果中表现良好,它可能是RA最推荐的药物组合。同样表现良好的ETX+MTX和IFX+MTX可作为替代治疗方法引入。然而,考虑到不良事件,相关治疗应谨慎引入。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c47/5871709/2a59b71663cb/fphar-09-00138-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验