Suppr超能文献

夜间禁食会影响短跑间歇训练期间的运动强度和运动量,但会提高高强度有氧耐力。

Overnight fasting compromises exercise intensity and volume during sprint interval training but improves high-intensity aerobic endurance.

作者信息

Terada Tasuku, Toghi Eshghi Saeed R, Liubaoerjijin Yilina, Kennedy Michael, Myette-Côté Étienne, Fletcher Kevin, Boulé Normand G

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation.

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Mar;59(3):357-365. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08281-6. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The combined effects of sprint interval training (SIT) and exercising in the fasted state are unknown. We compared the effects of SIT with exogenous carbohydrate supplementation (SIT-CHO) and SIT following overnight fast (SIT-Fast) on aerobic capacity (peak oxygen consumption: V̇O2peak) and high-intensity aerobic endurance (time-to-exhaustion at 85% V̇O2peak [T85%]).

METHODS

Twenty male cyclists were randomized to SIT-CHO and SIT-Fast. Both groups performed 30-second all-out cycling followed by 4-minute active recovery 3 times per week for 4 weeks, with the number of sprint bouts progressing from 4 to 7. Peak power output (PPO) and total mechanical work were measured for each sprint interval bout. The SIT-CHO group performed exercise sessions following breakfast and consumed carbohydrate drink during exercise, whereas the SIT-Fast group performed exercise sessions following overnight fast and consumed water during exercise. Before and after training, V̇O2peak and T85% were assessed. Blood glucose, non-esterified fatty acids, insulin and glucagon concentrations were measured during T85%.

RESULTS

Overall PPO and mechanical work were lower in SIT-Fast than SIT-CHO (3664.9 vs. 3871.7 J/kg; P=0.021 and 10.6 vs. 9.9 W/kg; P=0.010, respectively). Post-training V̇O2peak did not differ between groups. Baseline-adjusted post-training T85% was longer in SIT-Fast compared to SIT-CHO (19.7±3.0 vs. 16.6±3.0 minutes, ANCOVA P=0.038) despite no changes in circulating energy substrates or hormones.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that SIT-Fast compromises exercise intensity and volume but still can have a greater impact on the ability to sustain high-intensity aerobic endurance exercise compared to SIT-CHO.

摘要

背景

冲刺间歇训练(SIT)与空腹运动的联合效应尚不清楚。我们比较了补充外源性碳水化合物的冲刺间歇训练(SIT-CHO)和过夜禁食后的冲刺间歇训练(SIT-Fast)对有氧能力(峰值耗氧量:V̇O2peak)和高强度有氧耐力(在85%V̇O2peak时的力竭时间[T85%])的影响。

方法

20名男性自行车运动员被随机分为SIT-CHO组和SIT-Fast组。两组均每周进行3次30秒全力骑行,随后进行4分钟的主动恢复,共持续4周,冲刺次数从4次增加到7次。测量每个冲刺间歇回合的峰值功率输出(PPO)和总机械功。SIT-CHO组在早餐后进行训练,并在运动期间饮用碳水化合物饮料,而SIT-Fast组在过夜禁食后进行训练,并在运动期间饮用清水。在训练前后评估V̇O2peak和T85%。在T85%期间测量血糖、非酯化脂肪酸、胰岛素和胰高血糖素浓度。

结果

SIT-Fast组的总体PPO和机械功低于SIT-CHO组(分别为3664.9 vs. 3871.7 J/kg;P=0.021和10.6 vs. 9.9 W/kg;P=0.010)。训练后两组的V̇O2peak无差异。尽管循环能量底物或激素没有变化,但与SIT-CHO组相比,SIT-Fast组经基线调整后的训练后T85%更长(19.7±3.0 vs. 16.6±3.0分钟,协方差分析P=0.038)。

结论

我们的结果表明,SIT-Fast会降低运动强度和运动量,但与SIT-CHO相比,对维持高强度有氧耐力运动能力的影响可能更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验