a Department of Sport and Exercise , The University of the West of Scotland , Hamilton , UK.
J Sports Sci. 2018 Nov;36(21):2424-2430. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1461322. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
The GT3X+ worn at the wrist promotes greater compliance than at the hip. Minutes in SB and PA calculated from raw accelerations at the hip and wrist provide contrasting estimates and cannot be directly compared. Wear-time for the wrist (15.6 to 17.4 h.d) was greater than the hip (15.2 to 16.8 h.d) across several wear-time criteria (all P < 0.05). Moderate-strong associations were found between time spent in SB (r = 0.39), LPA (r = 0.33), MPA (r = 0.99), VPA (r = 0.82) and MVPA (r = 0.81) between the two device placements (All P < 0.001). The wrist device detected more minutes in LPA, MPA, VPA and MVPA whereas the hip detected more SB (all P = 0.001). Estimates of time in SB and all activity outcomes from the wrist and hip lacked equivalence. One hundred and eighty-eight 9-12-year-old children wore a wrist- and hip-mounted accelerometer for 7 days. Data were available for 160 (hip) and 161 (wrist) participants. Time spent in SB and PA was calculated using GGIR. This study examined the compliance of children wearing wrist- and hip-mounted ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers and compared estimates of sedentary behaviour (SB) and physical activity (PA) between devices.
佩戴在手腕上的 GT3X+ 比佩戴在臀部上更能提高依从性。从臀部和手腕的原始加速度计算得出的 SB 和 PA 分钟数提供了对比估计值,不能直接比较。在几个佩戴时间标准下(所有 P 值均小于 0.05),手腕(15.6 到 17.4 h.d)的佩戴时间(15.2 到 16.8 h.d)大于臀部。在两种设备放置方式下,发现 SB(r=0.39)、LPA(r=0.33)、MPA(r=0.99)、VPA(r=0.82)和 MVPA(r=0.81)之间的时间花费存在中度到强烈的相关性(所有 P 值均小于 0.001)。手腕设备检测到更多的 LPA、MPA、VPA 和 MVPA 分钟数,而臀部设备检测到更多的 SB(所有 P 值均为 0.001)。手腕和臀部设备检测到的 SB 和所有活动结果的时间估计值缺乏等效性。188 名 9-12 岁儿童佩戴腕部和臀部加速度计进行了 7 天的监测。有 160 名(臀部)和 161 名(手腕)参与者的数据可用。使用 GGIR 计算 SB 和 PA 的时间。本研究考察了佩戴腕部和臀部 ActiGraph GT3X+ 加速度计的儿童的依从性,并比较了设备之间久坐行为(SB)和身体活动(PA)的估计值。