• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

pfSTEP 数字生物标志物分析及临床有效性:评估社区居住的老年人群体身体功能下降易感性/风险

The Analytical and Clinical Validity of the pfSTEP Digital Biomarker of the Susceptibility/Risk of Declining Physical Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

机构信息

Institute for Data Science and AI, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QJ, UK.

Sports and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 27;23(11):5122. doi: 10.3390/s23115122.

DOI:10.3390/s23115122
PMID:37299849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10255880/
Abstract

Measures of stepping volume and rate are common outputs from wearable devices, such as accelerometers. It has been proposed that biomedical technologies, including accelerometers and their algorithms, should undergo rigorous verification as well as analytical and clinical validation to demonstrate that they are fit for purpose. The aim of this study was to use the V3 framework to assess the analytical and clinical validity of a wrist-worn measurement system of stepping volume and rate, formed by the GENEActiv accelerometer and GENEAcount step counting algorithm. The analytical validity was assessed by measuring the level of agreement between the wrist-worn system and a thigh-worn system (activPAL), the reference measure. The clinical validity was assessed by establishing the prospective association between the changes in stepping volume and rate with changes in physical function (SPPB score). The agreement of the thigh-worn reference system and the wrist-worn system was excellent for total daily steps (CCC = 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.91) and moderate for walking steps and faster-paced walking steps (CCC = 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.68 and 0.55, 95% CI 0.46-0.64, respectively). A higher number of total steps and faster paced-walking steps was consistently associated with better physical function. After 24 months, an increase of 1000 daily faster-paced walking steps was associated with a clinically meaningful increase in physical function (0.53 SPPB score, 95% CI 0.32-0.74). We have validated a digital susceptibility/risk biomarker-pfSTEP-that identifies an associated risk of low physical function in community-dwelling older adults using a wrist-worn accelerometer and its accompanying open-source step counting algorithm.

摘要

步幅和步频的测量是可穿戴设备(如加速度计)常见的输出结果。有人提出,生物医学技术,包括加速度计及其算法,应该经过严格的验证以及分析和临床验证,以证明其符合特定目的。本研究旨在使用 V3 框架评估由 GENEActiv 加速度计和 GENEAcount 计步算法组成的手腕佩戴式步幅和步频测量系统的分析和临床有效性。分析有效性通过测量手腕佩戴系统与大腿佩戴系统(activPAL,参考测量)之间的一致性水平来评估。临床有效性通过建立步幅和步频变化与身体功能(SPPB 评分)变化之间的前瞻性关联来评估。大腿佩戴参考系统和手腕佩戴系统在总日步数方面的一致性非常好(CCC = 0.88,95%CI 0.83-0.91),在行走步数和快节奏行走步数方面的一致性为中度(CCC = 0.61,95%CI 0.53-0.68 和 0.55,95%CI 0.46-0.64,分别)。总步数和快节奏行走步数越多,与身体功能越好相关。在 24 个月后,每天增加 1000 步快节奏行走与身体功能的临床显著改善相关(0.53 SPPB 评分,95%CI 0.32-0.74)。我们使用手腕佩戴加速度计及其配套的开源计步算法验证了一种数字易感性/风险生物标志物-pfSTEP-可以识别社区居住的老年人身体功能低下的相关风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d71/10255880/ac388588e3ba/sensors-23-05122-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d71/10255880/3eca31a0f9f5/sensors-23-05122-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d71/10255880/ac388588e3ba/sensors-23-05122-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d71/10255880/3eca31a0f9f5/sensors-23-05122-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d71/10255880/ac388588e3ba/sensors-23-05122-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Analytical and Clinical Validity of the pfSTEP Digital Biomarker of the Susceptibility/Risk of Declining Physical Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.pfSTEP 数字生物标志物分析及临床有效性:评估社区居住的老年人群体身体功能下降易感性/风险
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 27;23(11):5122. doi: 10.3390/s23115122.
2
Stepping towards More Intuitive Physical Activity Metrics with Wrist-Worn Accelerometry: Validity of an Open-Source Step-Count Algorithm.腕戴加速度计迈向更直观的体力活动指标:开源计步算法的有效性。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 18;22(24):9984. doi: 10.3390/s22249984.
3
Stepping up with GGIR: Validity of step cadence derived from wrist-worn research-grade accelerometers using the verisense step count algorithm.借助GGIR提升:使用Verisense步数计算算法从腕戴式研究级加速度计得出的步频的有效性。
J Sports Sci. 2022 Oct;40(19):2182-2190. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2022.2147134. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.用于腕部佩戴式加速度计数据的随机森林活动分类器的现场评估。
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Jan;20(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Estimation of Gait Parameters in Huntington's Disease Using Wearable Sensors in the Clinic and Free-living Conditions.使用可穿戴传感器在诊所和自由生活条件下估算亨廷顿病的步态参数。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024;32:2239-2249. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3407887. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Validation of open-source step-counting algorithms for wrist-worn tri-axial accelerometers in cardiovascular patients.腕戴三轴加速度计开源计步算法在心血管病患者中验证。
Gait Posture. 2022 Feb;92:206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.11.035. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
7
A catalog of validity indices for step counting wearable technologies during treadmill walking: the CADENCE-adults study.计步可穿戴技术在跑步机步行期间的有效性指标目录:CADENCE-成人研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 8;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01350-9.
8
Validation of the ADAMO Care Watch for step counting in older adults.ADAMO Care Watch用于老年人步数计数的验证。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 9;13(2):e0190753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190753. eCollection 2018.
9
Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.腕戴式活动追踪器在慢性疼痛患者的实验室和自由生活环境中的应用:效标效度研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 12;9(1):e24806. doi: 10.2196/24806.
10
Are Accelerometer-based Functional Outcome Assessments Feasible and Valid After Treatment for Lower Extremity Sarcomas?基于加速度计的功能结局评估在下肢肉瘤治疗后是否可行和有效?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):482-503. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000883.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between within-day step accumulation pattern and clinical measures of physical function: a change-for-change analysis of longitudinal data in community-dwelling older adults.日内步数累积模式与身体功能临床指标之间的关联:社区居住老年人纵向数据的变化对变化分析
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jul 15;22(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01797-6.
2
Cross-sectional associations between patterns and composition of upright and stepping events with physical function: insights from The Maastricht Study.直立和行走事件的模式与组成和身体功能之间的横断面关联:来自马斯特里赫特研究的见解
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2024 May 9;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s11556-024-00343-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Stepping towards More Intuitive Physical Activity Metrics with Wrist-Worn Accelerometry: Validity of an Open-Source Step-Count Algorithm.腕戴加速度计迈向更直观的体力活动指标:开源计步算法的有效性。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 18;22(24):9984. doi: 10.3390/s22249984.
2
Prospective Association of Daily Steps With Cardiovascular Disease: A Harmonized Meta-Analysis.每日步数与心血管疾病的前瞻性关联:一项综合荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2023 Jan 10;147(2):122-131. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061288. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
3
Stepping up with GGIR: Validity of step cadence derived from wrist-worn research-grade accelerometers using the verisense step count algorithm.
Unravelling upright events: a descriptive epidemiology of the behavioural composition and temporal distribution of upright events in participants from the 1970 British Cohort Study.
揭示直立事件:1970 年英国队列研究参与者中直立事件行为构成和时间分布的描述性流行病学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 21;24(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17976-2.
借助GGIR提升:使用Verisense步数计算算法从腕戴式研究级加速度计得出的步频的有效性。
J Sports Sci. 2022 Oct;40(19):2182-2190. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2022.2147134. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
Development and large-scale validation of the Watch Walk wrist-worn digital gait biomarkers.Watch Walk 腕戴式数字步态生物标志物的开发和大规模验证。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 10;12(1):16211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20327-z.
5
Association of step counts over time with the risk of chronic disease in the All of Us Research Program.随着时间的推移,步数与 All of Us 研究计划中慢性病风险的关系。
Nat Med. 2022 Nov;28(11):2301-2308. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02012-w. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
6
How Much Data Is Enough? A Reliable Methodology to Examine Long-Term Wearable Data Acquisition in Gait and Postural Sway.需要多少数据才足够?一种可靠的方法来检验步态和姿势摆动的长期可穿戴数据采集。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 15;22(18):6982. doi: 10.3390/s22186982.
7
Prospective Associations of Daily Step Counts and Intensity With Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence and Mortality and All-Cause Mortality.每日步数和强度与癌症、心血管疾病发病率和死亡率及全因死亡率的前瞻性关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Nov 1;182(11):1139-1148. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.4000.
8
A catalog of validity indices for step counting wearable technologies during treadmill walking: the CADENCE-adults study.计步可穿戴技术在跑步机步行期间的有效性指标目录:CADENCE-成人研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 8;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01350-9.
9
Association of Daily Step Count and Intensity With Incident Dementia in 78 430 Adults Living in the UK.在英国,78430 名成年人中,每日步数和强度与痴呆症发病的相关性。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):1059-1063. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2672.
10
Accurate Step Count with Generalized and Personalized Deep Learning on Accelerometer Data.利用加速度计数据的广义和个性化深度学习进行精确的步数计数。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 24;22(11):3989. doi: 10.3390/s22113989.