• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重感染患者住院后长期死亡的危险因素。

Risk factors for long-term mortality in patients admitted with severe infection.

机构信息

Serviço de Medicina, Hospital de Santo António, Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.

Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente, Hospital de Santo António, University of Porto, Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 5;18(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3054-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-018-3054-4
PMID:29621990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5887170/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe infection is a main cause of mortality. We aim to describe risk factors for long-term mortality among inpatients with severe infection.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study in a 600-bed university hospital in Portugal including all patients with severe infection admitted into intensive care, medical, surgical, hematology and nephrology wards over one-year period. The outcome of interest was 5-year mortality following infection. Variables of patient background and infectious episode were studied in association with the main outcome through multiple logistic regression. There were 1013 patients included in the study. Hospital and 5-year mortality rates were 14 and 37%, respectively.

RESULTS

Two different models were developed (with and without acute-illness severity scores) and factors independently associated with 5-year mortality were [adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval)]: age = 1.03 per year (1.02-1.04), cancer = 4.36 (1.65-11.53), no comorbidities = 0.4 (0.26-0.62), Karnovsky Index < 70 = 2.25 (1.48-3.40), SAPS (Simplified Acute Physiology Score) II = 1.05 per point (1.03-1.07), positive blood cultures = 1.57 (1.01-2.44) and infection by an ESKAPE pathogen (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeroginosa and Enterobacter species) = 1.61 (1.00- 2.60); and in the second model [without SAPS II and SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) scores]: age = 1.04 per year (1.03-1.05), cancer = 5.93 (2.26-15.51), chronic haematologic disease = 2.37 (1.14-4.93), no comorbidities = 0.45 (0.29-0.69), Karnovsky Index< 70 = 2.32 (1.54- 3.50), septic shock [reference is infection without SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome)] = 3.77 (1.80-7.89) and infection by an ESKAPE pathogen = 1.61 (1.00-2.60). Both models presented a good discrimination power with an AU-ROC curve (95% CI) of 0.81 (0.77-0.84) for model 1 and 0.80 (0.76-0.83) for model 2. If only patients that survived hospital admission are included in the model, variables retained are: age = 1.03 per year (1.02-1.05), cancer = 4.69 (1.71-12.83), chronic respiratory disease = 2.27 (1.09-4.69), diabetes mellitus = 1.65 (1.06-2.56), Karnovsky Index < 70 = 2.50 (1.63-3.83) and positive blood cultures = 1.66 (1.04-2.64) with an AU-ROC curve of 0.77 (0.73-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, previous comorbidities, and functional status and infection by an ESKAPE pathogen were consistently associated with long-term prognosis. This information may help in the discussion of individual prognosis and clinical decision-making.

摘要

背景

严重感染是导致死亡的主要原因。本研究旨在描述重症感染患者长期死亡的危险因素。

方法

这是一项在葡萄牙一家拥有 600 张床位的大学医院进行的前瞻性队列研究,纳入了重症监护病房、内科、外科、血液科和肾病科病房中所有严重感染患者。感染后 5 年死亡率是研究的主要终点。通过多因素逻辑回归分析患者背景和感染情况与主要结局的关系。共纳入 1013 例患者,医院和 5 年死亡率分别为 14%和 37%。

结果

建立了两个不同的模型(有和没有急性疾病严重程度评分),与 5 年死亡率相关的独立因素为[校正比值比(95%置信区间)]:年龄每年增加 1.03(1.02-1.04),癌症 4.36(1.65-11.53),无合并症 0.4(0.26-0.62),卡诺夫斯基指数<70 2.25(1.48-3.40),简化急性生理学评分 II 每增加 1 分 1.05(1.03-1.07),血培养阳性 1.57(1.01-2.44)和感染 ESKAPE 病原体(屎肠球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和肠杆菌属)1.61(1.00-2.60);在第二个模型中(无 SAPS II 和 SOFA 评分):年龄每年增加 1.04(1.03-1.05),癌症 5.93(2.26-15.51),慢性血液系统疾病 2.37(1.14-4.93),无合并症 0.45(0.29-0.69),卡诺夫斯基指数<70 2.32(1.54-3.50),感染性休克[参考为无全身炎症反应综合征的感染]3.77(1.80-7.89)和感染 ESKAPE 病原体 1.61(1.00-2.60)。两个模型均具有良好的区分能力,模型 1 的 AU-ROC 曲线(95%CI)为 0.81(0.77-0.84),模型 2 为 0.80(0.76-0.83)。如果仅纳入存活出院患者的模型,保留的变量为:年龄每年增加 1.03(1.02-1.05),癌症 4.69(1.71-12.83),慢性呼吸系统疾病 2.27(1.09-4.69),糖尿病 1.65(1.06-2.56),卡诺夫斯基指数<70 2.50(1.63-3.83)和血培养阳性 1.66(1.04-2.64),AU-ROC 曲线为 0.77(0.73-0.81)。

结论

年龄、既往合并症、功能状态和感染 ESKAPE 病原体与长期预后相关。这些信息可能有助于讨论个体预后和临床决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc0c/5887170/fb63a33ff0cf/12879_2018_3054_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc0c/5887170/fb63a33ff0cf/12879_2018_3054_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc0c/5887170/fb63a33ff0cf/12879_2018_3054_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for long-term mortality in patients admitted with severe infection.严重感染患者住院后长期死亡的危险因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 5;18(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3054-4.
2
Frequency and clinical outcomes of ESKAPE bacteremia in solid organ transplantation and the risk factors for mortality.实体器官移植中ESKAPE菌血症的发生率、临床结局及死亡危险因素
Transpl Infect Dis. 2014 Oct;16(5):767-74. doi: 10.1111/tid.12278. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
3
The risk factors for mortality and septic shock in liver transplant recipients with ESKAPE bacteremia.患有ESKAPE菌血症的肝移植受者的死亡和感染性休克风险因素。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2015 Mar-Apr;62(138):346-9.
4
Outcome of patients with cirrhosis requiring mechanical ventilation in ICU.ICU 中需要机械通气的肝硬化患者的转归。
J Hepatol. 2014 Mar;60(3):570-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
5
Risk factors and outcomes of bacteremia caused by drug-resistant ESKAPE pathogens in solid-organ transplant recipients.实体器官移植受者中耐药 ESKAPE 病原体引起菌血症的危险因素和结局。
Transplantation. 2013 Nov 15;96(9):843-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a049fd.
6
Acinetobacter spp. are associated with a higher mortality in intensive care patients with bacteremia: a survival analysis.不动杆菌属与重症监护病房菌血症患者的较高死亡率相关:一项生存分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 9;16:386. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1695-8.
7
Sepsis-Associated Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Malignancies.恶性肿瘤危重症患者脓毒症相关结局。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Aug;12(8):1185-92. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201501-046OC.
8
Mortality Predictors in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Renal Transplant Recipients With ESKAPE/rESKAPE Pneumonia.急性呼吸窘迫综合征肾移植受者合并ESKAPE/rESKAPE肺炎的死亡预测因素
Transplant Proc. 2015 Oct;47(8):2450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.08.005.
9
Predictors of short and long-term outcome in patients with hematological disorders admitted to the intensive care unit for a life-threatening complication.因危及生命的并发症入住重症监护病房的血液系统疾病患者短期和长期预后的预测因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Dec;15(12):1393-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0268-1. Epub 2007 May 22.
10
Severity Scores in Emergency Department Patients With Presumed Infection: A Prospective Validation Study.急诊科疑似感染患者的严重程度评分:一项前瞻性验证研究。
Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):539-47. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001427.

引用本文的文献

1
Two-Year Mortality and Prognostic Factors in Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study of 714 Danish Emergency Department Patients.脓毒症患者的两年死亡率及预后因素:对714例丹麦急诊科患者的前瞻性队列研究
Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 28;17:581-592. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S524819. eCollection 2025.
2
Understanding current challenges of antibiotic resistance to find new solutions for 2050: scientific, medical and political issues.了解抗生素耐药性的当前挑战,为2050年寻找新的解决方案:科学、医学和政治问题。
Arch Microbiol. 2025 May 29;207(7):162. doi: 10.1007/s00203-025-04340-0.
3
Risk Factors and Mortality Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence for a causal link between sepsis and long-term mortality: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies.脓毒症与长期死亡率之间因果关系的证据:流行病学研究的系统评价
Crit Care. 2016 Apr 13;20:101. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1276-7.
2
Risk factors for long-term mortality of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症长期死亡率的危险因素。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 May;35(5):785-90. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2598-8. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
3
Long-term mortality after community-acquired sepsis: a longitudinal population-based cohort study.
老年血流感染患者的危险因素及死亡结局:一项回顾性分析。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 24;16(7):e65275. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65275. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Impact of the implementation of a Sepsis Code Program in medical patient management: a cohort study in an Internal Medicine ward.Sepsis 编码方案在医疗患者管理中的实施效果:内科病房中的一项队列研究。
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2022 Apr;35(2):178-191. doi: 10.37201/req/132.2021. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department.比较不同的脓毒症评分系统和途径:qSOFA、SIRS、Shapiro 标准和 CEC SEPSIS KILLS 途径在就诊于急诊科的菌血症和非菌血症患者中的应用。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 22;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07070-6.
6
Culture positivity may correlate with long-term mortality in critically ill patients.培养物阳性可能与危重症患者的长期死亡率相关。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 26;21(1):1188. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06898-8.
7
Pathogenic Characteristics and Risk Factors for ESKAPE Pathogens Infection in Burn Patients.烧伤患者中ESKAPE病原体感染的致病特征及危险因素
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Nov 12;14:4727-4738. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S338627. eCollection 2021.
8
Long-Term Survival Following Sepsis.败血症存活时间长。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Nov 13;117(46):775-782. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0775.
9
The Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients in China: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.中国重症患者脓毒症的患病率、危险因素及预后:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Dec 17;7:593808. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.593808. eCollection 2020.
10
Primary immunodeficiency disease: a cost-utility analysis comparing intravenous vs subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy in Australia.原发性免疫缺陷病:比较澳大利亚静脉注射与皮下免疫球蛋白替代疗法的成本-效用分析。
Blood Transfus. 2020 Mar;18(2):96-105. doi: 10.2450/2019.0083-19. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
社区获得性脓毒症后的长期死亡率:一项基于人群的纵向队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 17;4(1):e004283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004283.
4
Short- and long-term mortality in severe sepsis/septic shock in a setting with low antibiotic resistance: a prospective observational study in a Swedish university hospital.在抗生素耐药率低的环境中严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克的短期和长期死亡率:瑞典一所大学医院的前瞻性观察研究。
Front Public Health. 2013 Nov 15;1:51. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2013.00051. eCollection 2013.
5
Two decades of mortality trends among patients with severe sepsis: a comparative meta-analysis*.20 年来严重脓毒症患者死亡率趋势:一项比较性荟萃分析*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):625-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000026.
6
Differences in microbiological profile between community-acquired, healthcare-associated and hospital-acquired infections.社区获得性感染、医疗保健相关感染和医院获得性感染之间微生物学特征的差异。
Acta Med Port. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):377-84. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
7
Mortality and quality of life in the five years after severe sepsis.严重脓毒症后五年内的死亡率及生活质量
Crit Care. 2013 Apr 16;17(2):R70. doi: 10.1186/cc12616.
8
Long-term consequences of severe infections.严重感染的长期后果。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Jun;19(6):510-2. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12160. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
9
Long-term mortality following bloodstream infection.血流感染后的长期死亡率。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Oct;19(10):955-60. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12101. Epub 2012 Dec 22.
10
The growing role of emergency departments in hospital admissions.急诊科在医院住院治疗中日益重要的作用。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 2;367(5):391-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1204431. Epub 2012 Jul 11.