Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
Department of Health Care, Hubei Maternal and Child Health Hospital, 430022, Wuhan, China.
J Hum Hypertens. 2018 Jun;32(6):408-414. doi: 10.1038/s41371-018-0056-z. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
Blood pressure-to-height ratio (BPHR) has been reported to perform well for identifying hypertension (HTN) in adolescents but not in young children. Our study was aimed to evaluate the performance of BPHR and modified BPHR (MBPHR) for screening HTN in children. A total of 5268 Chinese children (boys: 53.1%) aged 6-12 years and 5024 American children (boys: 48.1%) aged 8-12 years were included in the present study. BPHR was calculated as BP/height (mmHg/cm). MBPHR7 was calculated as BP/(height + 7*(13-age)). MBPHR3 was calculated as BP/(height + 3*(13-age)). We used receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis to assess the performance of the three ratios for identifying HTN in children as compared to the 2017 U.S. clinical guideline as the "gold standard". The prevalence of HTN in Chinese and American children was 9.4% and 5.4%, respectively, based on the 2017 U.S. guideline. The AUC was larger for MBPHR3 than BPHR and MBPHR7. All three ratios had optimal negative predictive value (~100%). The positive predictive value (PPV) was higher for MBPHR3 than BPHR in both Chinese (43.9% vs. 37.9%) and American (39.1% vs. 26.3%) children. In contrast, the PPV was higher for MBPHR7 than BPHR in Chinese children (47.4% vs. 37.9%) but not in American children (24.8% vs. 26.3%). In summary, MBPHR3 overall performed better than MBPHR7 and BPHR for identifying HTN in children. However, the three ratios had low PPV (<50%) as compared to the 2017 U.S. guidelines, which makes these ratios of limited use for HTN screening in children.
血压与身高比值(BPHR)已被报道在识别青少年高血压(HTN)方面表现良好,但在幼儿中效果不佳。本研究旨在评估 BPHR 和改良 BPHR(MBPHR)在儿童 HTN 筛查中的表现。本研究共纳入 5268 名中国儿童(男孩:53.1%),年龄为 6-12 岁;5024 名美国儿童(男孩:48.1%),年龄为 8-12 岁。BPHR 计算方法为 BP/身高(mmHg/cm)。MBPHR7 的计算方法为 BP/(身高+7×(13-年龄))。MBPHR3 的计算方法为 BP/(身高+3×(13-年龄))。我们使用受试者工作特征曲线分析评估了三种比值与 2017 年美国临床指南(作为“金标准”)相比在识别儿童 HTN 中的性能。根据 2017 年美国指南,中国和美国儿童的 HTN 患病率分别为 9.4%和 5.4%。MBPHR3 的 AUC 大于 BPHR 和 MBPHR7。所有三种比值的阴性预测值均接近 100%。MBPHR3 的阳性预测值(PPV)在中国(43.9%比 37.9%)和美国(39.1%比 26.3%)儿童中均高于 BPHR,而在 BPHR 中则低于 MBPHR7。相比之下,MBPHR7 的 PPV 在中国儿童中(47.4%比 37.9%)高于 BPHR,但在美国儿童中(24.8%比 26.3%)则低于 BPHR。总之,MBPHR3 总体上比 MBPHR7 和 BPHR 更能识别儿童中的 HTN。然而,与 2017 年美国指南相比,这些比值的 PPV 均较低(<50%),因此在儿童 HTN 筛查中的应用有限。