Petersdorf Megan, Dubuc Constance, Georgiev Alexander V, Winters Sandra, Higham James P
Department of Anthropology, New York University, 25 Waverly Pl, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Institute for Mind and Biology, The University of Chicago, 940 E 57th St, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Behav Ecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;28(6):1472-1481. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arx110. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
Exaggerated male traits can evolve under intra- or intersexual selection, but it remains less clear how often both mechanisms act together on trait evolution. While the males of many anthropoid primate species exhibit colorful signals that appear to be badges of status under intrasexual selection, the red facial coloration of male rhesus macaques () appears to have evolved primarily under intersexual selection and female mate choice. Nonetheless, experiments show that red color is salient to males, raising the question of whether the signal may also be under intrasexual selection. Here, we examine whether males express this signal more strongly in competitive contexts. Facial images were collected on all 15 adult males of a free-ranging social group during the peak of the mating season, and coloration was quantified using visual models. Results show that males more similar in facial redness were more likely to interact aggressively than more dissimilar ones, suggesting that color may be involved in the assessment of rivals. Furthermore, males exhibited darker coloration on days they were observed copulating, and dominance rank predicted facial redness only on copulating days, suggesting that coloration may also advertise motivation to defend a mate. Male rhesus macaque facial coloration may thus mediate agonistic interactions with rivals during competition over reproductive opportunities, such that it is under both inter- and intrasexual selection. However, color differences were small, raising perceptibility questions. It remains possible that color variation reflects differences in male condition, which in turn alter investment towards male-male competition and mating effort.
夸张的雄性特征可在同性或异性选择下进化,但两种机制共同作用于特征进化的频率仍不太清楚。虽然许多类人猿灵长类物种的雄性表现出色彩鲜艳的信号,这些信号在同性选择下似乎是地位的标志,但雄性恒河猴()的红色面部着色似乎主要是在异性选择和雌性配偶选择下进化而来的。尽管如此,实验表明红色对雄性很显著,这就提出了该信号是否也受同性选择的问题。在这里,我们研究雄性在竞争环境中是否会更强烈地表达这种信号。在交配季节高峰期,收集了一个自由放养社会群体中所有15只成年雄性的面部图像,并使用视觉模型对颜色进行了量化。结果表明,面部红色程度更相似的雄性比差异较大的雄性更有可能发生激烈互动,这表明颜色可能参与了对竞争对手的评估。此外,雄性在被观察到交配的日子里颜色更深,而且优势等级仅在交配日预测面部红色程度,这表明颜色也可能表明保护配偶的动机。因此,雄性恒河猴的面部颜色可能在争夺繁殖机会的竞争中调节与竞争对手的对抗性互动,从而同时受到异性和同性选择。然而,颜色差异很小,这引发了可察觉性的问题。颜色变化仍有可能反映雄性身体状况的差异,进而改变对雄性间竞争和交配努力的投入。