Dent Rosanna, Santos Ricardo Ventura
McGill University.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz and Museu Nacional/UFRJ.
Perspect Sci. 2017 Sep;25(5):585-605. doi: 10.1162/POSC_a_00255. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
In the twentieth century, biomedical researchers believed the study of Indigenous Amazonians could inform global histories of human biological diversity. This paper examines the similarities and differences of two approaches to this mid-century biomedical research, comparing the work of virologist and epidemiologist Francis Black with human geneticists James V. Neel and Francisco Salzano. While both groups were interested in Indigenous populations as representatives of the past, their perspectives on epidemics diverged. For Black, outbreaks of infectious diseases were central to his methodological and theoretical interests; for Neel and Salzano, epidemics could potentially compromise the epistemological value of their data.
在二十世纪,生物医学研究人员认为对亚马逊原住民的研究可以为人类生物多样性的全球历史提供信息。本文考察了这种世纪中叶生物医学研究的两种方法的异同,比较了病毒学家兼流行病学家弗朗西斯·布莱克与人类遗传学家詹姆斯·V·尼尔和弗朗西斯科·萨尔扎诺的工作。虽然两组人员都对作为过去代表的原住民群体感兴趣,但他们对流行病的看法却有所不同。对布莱克来说,传染病的爆发是其方法论和理论兴趣的核心;对尼尔和萨尔扎诺来说,流行病可能会损害他们数据的认识论价值。