Abdelmonem Yasser Yazied, Bakr Adel Abdelgawad, El-Hossary Hossam Ghanem, Ghany Mohammed Mahmoud Abdel
Kasr Alainy, Department of Cardiology, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.
Egypt Heart J. 2017 Sep;69(3):191-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 May 8.
The characterization of patients who have acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and insignificant coronary stenosis is unclear.
The present study aimed to investigate the clinical profile, in-hospital and 3-month outcome of AMI patients with insignificant coronary stenosis in comparison with those with significant disease.
This prospective observational study included 200 consecutive patients admitted with AMI. Group I (100 patients) included patients with insignificant CAD (all lesions <50% stenosis). Group II (100 patients) included patients with one or more lesions >70% stenosis. Patients with previous CABG were excluded. Patients with significant CAD had successful total revascularization.
Patients with insignificant CAD were significantly younger (61 vs. 67 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be females (41% vs. 23%, p = 0.006), less likely to smoke (p = 0.006), less likely to have diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), and less likely to have history of CAD (p = 0.042) or prior PCI (p = 0.037). They were also less likely to have typical anginal pain at presentation (61% vs 91%, p < 0.001), less likely to have heart failure at presentation (9% vs 30%, p < 0.001), less likely to have ischemic ST-segment changes on presentation (10% vs 46%, p < 0.001), lower peak troponin (p < 0.001) and CK-MB levels (p < 0.001), with lower LDL-C (p = 0.006), and higher HDL-C level (p = 0.020). They were less likely to be treated with b-blockers (p = 0.002), ACEI/ARBS (p = 0.007), and higher rates of calcium channel blocker therapy (p < 0.001). They had lower prevalence of major adverse clinical events at follow-up (readmission for ACS (p = 0.009), need for revascularization (p = 0.035), recurrent chest pain (p = 0.009), and cardiogenic shock (p = 0.029).
Patients with AMI and insignificant CAD have different clinical profile and outcome compared to those with significant disease.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)且冠状动脉狭窄不显著患者的特征尚不清楚。
本研究旨在调查冠状动脉狭窄不显著的AMI患者与冠状动脉狭窄显著的患者相比的临床特征、住院期间及3个月的结局。
这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了200例连续收治的AMI患者。第一组(100例患者)包括冠状动脉疾病不显著(所有病变狭窄<50%)的患者。第二组(100例患者)包括有一处或多处病变狭窄>70%的患者。既往有冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者被排除。冠状动脉狭窄显著的患者成功实现了完全血运重建。
冠状动脉疾病不显著的患者明显更年轻(61岁对67岁,p<0.001),更可能为女性(41%对23%,p=0.006),吸烟可能性更小(p=0.006),患糖尿病可能性更小(p<0.001),有冠状动脉疾病史(p=0.042)或既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)史(p=0.037)的可能性更小。他们在就诊时出现典型心绞痛的可能性也更小(61%对91%,p<0.001),就诊时发生心力衰竭的可能性更小(9%对30%,p<0.001),就诊时出现缺血性ST段改变的可能性更小(10%对46%,p<0.001),肌钙蛋白峰值更低(p<0.001)和肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)水平更低(p<0.001),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)更低(p=0.006),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平更高(p=0.020)。他们接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的可能性更小(p=0.002),接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(ACEI/ARBs)治疗的可能性更小(p=0.007),而钙通道阻滞剂治疗率更高(p<0.001)。他们在随访时主要不良临床事件的发生率更低(因急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)再次入院(p=0.009)、需要血运重建(p=0.035)、复发性胸痛(p=0.009)和心源性休克(p=0.029))。
与冠状动脉狭窄显著的患者相比,AMI且冠状动脉狭窄不显著的患者具有不同的临床特征和结局。