• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有效回应在线环境下成年心理健康患者的反馈:共创框架。

Responding effectively to adult mental health patient feedback in an online environment: A coproduced framework.

机构信息

Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research and Assessment, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Volunteer Mental Health Patient-Research-Partner, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2018 Oct;21(5):887-898. doi: 10.1111/hex.12682. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12682
PMID:29624815
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6186539/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Responding to online patient feedback is considered integral to patient safety and quality improvement. However, guidance on how to respond effectively is limited, with limited attention paid to patient perceptions and reactions.

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors considered potentially helpful in enhancing response quality; coproduce a best-practice response framework; and quality-appraise existing responses.

DESIGN

A four-stage mixed methodology: (i) systematic search of stories published on Care Opinion about adult mental health services in the South West of England; (ii) collaborative thematic analysis of responses to identify factors potentially helpful in enhancing response quality; (iii) validation of identified factors by a patient-carer group (n = 12) leading to the coproduction of a best-practice response framework; and (iv) quality appraisal of existing responses.

RESULTS

A total of 245 stories were identified, with 183 (74.7%) receiving a response. Twenty-four (9.8%) had been heard but not yet responded to. 1.6% (n = 4/245) may lead to a change. Nineteen factors were considered influential in response quality. These centred around seven subject areas: (i) introductions; (ii) explanations; (iii) speed of response; (iv) thanks and apologies; (v) response content; (vi) signposting; and (vii) response sign-off that were developed into a conceptual framework (the Plymouth, Listen, Learn and Respond framework). Quality appraisal of existing responses highlighted areas for further improvement demonstrating the framework's utility.

CONCLUSION

This study advances existing understanding by providing previously unavailable guidance. It has clear practical and theoretical implications for those looking to improve health-care services, patient safety and quality of care. Further validation of the conceptual framework is encouraged.

摘要

背景

回应在线患者反馈被认为是患者安全和质量改进的重要组成部分。然而,关于如何有效回应的指导有限,对患者的看法和反应关注甚少。

目的

确定增强回应质量的潜在有用因素;共同制定最佳实践回应框架;并对现有回应进行质量评估。

设计

一个四阶段的混合方法:(i)系统搜索在英格兰西南部发布的关于成人心理健康服务的 Care Opinion 上发表的故事;(ii)对回应进行协作主题分析,以确定潜在有助于提高回应质量的因素;(iii)通过患者-护理人员小组(n=12)验证确定的因素,导致共同制定最佳实践回应框架;以及(iv)对现有回应进行质量评估。

结果

共确定了 245 个故事,其中 183 个(74.7%)收到了回应。24 个(9.8%)已收到但尚未回应。1.6%(n=245)可能会导致变化。19 个因素被认为对回应质量有影响。这些因素集中在七个主题领域:(i)介绍;(ii)解释;(iii)回应速度;(iv)感谢和道歉;(v)回应内容;(vi)引导;以及(vii)回应结束,这些因素被开发成一个概念框架(普利茅斯,倾听,学习和回应框架)。对现有回应的质量评估突出了进一步改进的领域,展示了该框架的实用性。

结论

这项研究通过提供以前无法获得的指导,推进了现有知识。对于那些希望改进医疗保健服务、患者安全和护理质量的人来说,具有明确的实践和理论意义。鼓励进一步验证概念框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217c/6186539/2ff90a8820ee/HEX-21-887-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217c/6186539/16612b11a8f6/HEX-21-887-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217c/6186539/5521122cd4e3/HEX-21-887-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217c/6186539/b7b848d90658/HEX-21-887-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217c/6186539/2ff90a8820ee/HEX-21-887-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217c/6186539/16612b11a8f6/HEX-21-887-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217c/6186539/5521122cd4e3/HEX-21-887-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217c/6186539/b7b848d90658/HEX-21-887-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217c/6186539/2ff90a8820ee/HEX-21-887-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Responding effectively to adult mental health patient feedback in an online environment: A coproduced framework.有效回应在线环境下成年心理健康患者的反馈:共创框架。
Health Expect. 2018 Oct;21(5):887-898. doi: 10.1111/hex.12682. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
2
Implementing a survey for patients to provide safety experience feedback following a care transition: a feasibility study.实施一项调查,让患者在护理交接后提供安全体验反馈:一项可行性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4447-9.
3
Meaning and barriers to quality care service provision in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: Qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives.儿童和青少年心理健康服务中优质护理服务提供的意义及障碍:利益相关者观点的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2080-z.
4
Online patient feedback as a measure of quality in primary care: a multimethod study using correlation and qualitative analysis.在线患者反馈作为初级保健质量的衡量标准:使用相关分析和定性分析的多方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 28;10(2):e031820. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031820.
5
Is knowledge and practice safer in England after the release of national guidance on the resuscitation of patients in mental health and learning disabilities?在发布关于精神健康和学习障碍患者复苏的国家指南后,英国的知识和实践是否更安全了?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014;21(9):806-13. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12126. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
9
Human factors paradigm and customer care perceptions.人为因素范式与客户关怀认知
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(3):288-99. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2014-0067.
10
Application of the i-PARIHS framework for enhancing understanding of interactive dissemination to achieve wide-scale improvement in Indigenous primary healthcare.应用 i-PARIHS 框架增强对互动传播的理解,以实现原住民初级医疗的广泛改善。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 29;16(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0392-z.

引用本文的文献

1
An Exploration of Online Positive Feedback in Relation to Mental Health Nursing Practice.关于心理健康护理实践的在线积极反馈探索
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(4):e70116. doi: 10.1111/inm.70116.
2
What Do We Know About Sharing Power in Co-Production in Mental Health Research? A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.在精神健康研究中的共同生产中分享权力,我们了解多少?系统评价和主题综合。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70014. doi: 10.1111/hex.70014.
3
Exploring the sociocultural contexts in which healthcare staff respond to and use online patient feedback in practice: In-depth case studies of three NHS Trusts.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing patient and public involvement (PPI): Identifying its "essential" and "desirable" principles using a systematic review and modified Delphi methodology.优化患者和公众参与(PPI):使用系统评价和改良 Delphi 方法确定其“必要”和“期望”原则。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):327-335. doi: 10.1111/hex.12618. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
2
The Patient Feedback Response Framework - Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study.患者反馈响应框架——了解英国医院工作人员为何难以根据患者反馈做出改进:一项定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
3
探索医疗保健人员在实际工作中回应和使用在线患者反馈的社会文化背景:对三个国民保健服务信托基金的深入案例研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Oct 17;8:20552076221129085. doi: 10.1177/20552076221129085. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Views of Care at End of Life: A Secondary Analysis of Online Feedback Using Care Opinion.临终关怀观点:使用“关怀意见”对在线反馈进行的二次分析
J Patient Exp. 2022 May 30;9:23743735221103029. doi: 10.1177/23743735221103029. eCollection 2022.
5
Use and usability of GP online services: a mixed-methods sequential study, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on qualitative interviews, analysis of routine eConsult usage and feedback data, and assessment of GP websites in Devon and Cornwall, England.GP 在线服务的使用和可用性:一项混合方法的序贯研究,在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间进行,基于定性访谈、常规电子咨询使用情况和反馈数据的分析,以及对英格兰德文郡和康沃尔郡的 GP 网站的评估。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 7;12(3):e058247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058247.
6
'Using humanity to change systems' - understanding the work of online feedback moderation: A case study of Care Opinion Scotland.“利用人性改变系统”——理解在线反馈审核工作:苏格兰护理意见案例研究
Digit Health. 2022 Feb 23;8:20552076211074489. doi: 10.1177/20552076211074489. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
Implementing online patient feedback in a 'special measures' acute hospital: A case study using Normalisation Process Theory.在一家“特别措施”急症医院实施在线患者反馈:一项运用常态化过程理论的案例研究
Digit Health. 2021 Apr 1;7:20552076211005962. doi: 10.1177/20552076211005962. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
The sociocultural and behavioural characteristics that patients want in psychiatrists: cross-sectional survey of patients' views.患者期望精神科医生具备的社会文化及行为特征:患者观点的横断面调查
BJPsych Bull. 2021 Jun;45(3):158-163. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2020.115.
9
Anonymity, veracity and power in online patient feedback: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of staff responses to patient comments on the 'Care Opinion' platform in Scotland.在线患者反馈中的匿名性、真实性与影响力:对苏格兰“关爱意见”平台上工作人员对患者评论的回应进行的定量与定性分析
Digit Health. 2020 Jan 22;6:2055207619899520. doi: 10.1177/2055207619899520. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy.
医疗保健系统中的患者投诉:系统评价与编码分类法
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Aug;23(8):678-89. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437. Epub 2014 May 29.
4
The SATISPSY-22: development and validation of a French hospitalized patients' satisfaction questionnaire in psychiatry.SATISPSY - 22:法国精神病住院患者满意度问卷的研制与验证
Eur Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;30(1):172-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
What do patients say about their physicians? an analysis of 3000 narrative comments posted on a German physician rating website.患者如何评价他们的医生?对德国一个医生评分网站上发布的3000条叙述性评论的分析。
Health Policy. 2014 Oct;118(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 2.
6
Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: they must be used to improve care.收集患者体验数据是不够的:必须利用这些数据来改善医疗服务。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 26;348:g2225. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2225.
7
The role of constructive feedback in patient safety and continuous quality improvement.建设性反馈在患者安全和持续质量改进中的作用。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2012 Sep;47(3):365-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
8
Barriers to participation in a patient satisfaction survey: who are we missing?参与患者满意度调查的障碍:我们遗漏了谁?
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026852. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
9
The effect of patient feedback on physicians' consultation skills: a systematic review.患者反馈对医生问诊技能的影响:系统评价。
Acad Med. 2011 Nov;86(11):1426-36. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182312162.
10
'What difference does it make?' Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of detained psychiatric patients.“这有什么区别?”寻找心理健康服务使用者研究人员对被拘留精神病人的经历研究的影响的证据。
Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):185-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00596.x.