Rubinow D R, Hoban M C, Grover G N, Galloway D S, Roy-Byrne P, Andersen R, Merriam G R
Unit on Peptide Studies, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jan;158(1):5-11. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90765-x.
A variety of hypotheses have been proposed to explain the premenstrual syndromes. These hypotheses serve as rationales for an equally diverse range of proposed treatments. To investigate these hypotheses, we obtained multiple blood samples across the menstrual cycle in women with well-characterized menstrually related mood disorder and in control subjects. No diagnosis-related differences were observed in the levels or patterns of secretion of progesterone, estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, testosterone-estradiol-binding globulin, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, dihydrotestosterone, prolactin, or cortisol. Our data suggest that premenstrual syndrome does not represent a simple hormonal deficiency and that the cited rationales for several of the proposed treatments are of questionable merit.
人们已经提出了各种各样的假说来解释经前综合征。这些假说为同样多种多样的提议治疗方法提供了理论依据。为了研究这些假说,我们在患有特征明确的经前情绪障碍的女性和对照受试者的整个月经周期中采集了多个血样。在孕酮、雌二醇、促卵泡激素、促黄体生成素、睾酮 - 雌二醇结合球蛋白、硫酸脱氢表雄酮、双氢睾酮、催乳素或皮质醇的分泌水平或模式上,未观察到与诊断相关的差异。我们的数据表明,经前综合征并非简单的激素缺乏,并且几种提议治疗方法所引用的理论依据的价值值得怀疑。