H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Oct;18(5):e1031-e1036. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
Women with breast imaging often seek second opinions at tertiary care centers. Our study measures the frequency of discrepancy between initial and second opinion breast imaging recommendations and evaluates the impact on patient management.
A retrospective chart review was conducted on 504 consecutive patients with second opinion breast radiology interpretations performed by 6 sub-specialized breast radiologists at a dedicated cancer center from January 1, 2014 through September 1, 2014. Outside imaging reports were compared with second opinion reports to categorize discrepancies. Interpretations were considered discrepant in cases with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category changes, recommendation for additional imaging, or identification of previously undiagnosed additional extent of disease greater than 5 cm. The frequencies of discrepancy, alterations in surgical management, and incremental cancer detection were measured. Statistical analysis of associated factors was performed with the Fisher exact test, with a P-value < .05 considered significant.
Second opinion evaluation discrepancies were seen in 287 (57%) patients and resulted in percutaneous image-guided biopsies in 92 (18%). Forty-five additional sites of cancer were biopsy-detected in 41 (8%) patients, including 20 breast malignancies and 25 axillary metastases. Another 9 biopsies yielded high-risk pathology. Second opinion interpretations altered surgical management in 66 (13%) patients. Factors associated with increased discrepancy frequency were cancer diagnosis at presentation (P = .004), dense breasts (P = .005), and the absence of prior studies for comparison (P = .007).
Although additional imaging and resources are required, second opinion radiology review by subspecialized breast radiologists increases cancer detection and results in clinically relevant changes in patient management.
进行乳房影像学检查的女性常到三级保健中心寻求第二诊疗意见。本研究旨在衡量初始和第二诊疗意见乳房影像学检查推荐意见之间的差异频率,并评估其对患者管理的影响。
回顾性分析了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 9 月 1 日期间,6 名乳腺放射学专家对在专门癌症中心进行的 504 例第二诊疗意见乳腺放射学检查的连续患者的病历。将外部影像学报告与第二诊疗意见报告进行比较,以对差异进行分类。如果存在乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类改变、建议进行额外影像学检查、或发现之前未诊断的疾病程度大于 5cm,则认为检查结果存在差异。对差异的频率、手术管理的改变以及增量癌症检测进行了测量。采用 Fisher 精确检验对相关因素进行统计学分析,P 值小于 0.05 为差异有统计学意义。
287 例(57%)患者的第二诊疗意见评估结果存在差异,其中 92 例(18%)进行了经皮影像引导活检。41 例(8%)患者中另外检测到 45 个癌症部位,包括 20 例乳腺恶性肿瘤和 25 例腋窝转移。另外 9 例活检结果为高危病理。第二诊疗意见改变了 66 例(13%)患者的手术管理。增加差异频率的相关因素包括就诊时癌症诊断(P =.004)、致密乳腺(P =.005)和缺乏可供比较的先前研究(P =.007)。
尽管需要额外的影像学和资源,但由乳腺放射学专家进行的第二诊疗意见放射学检查可提高癌症检出率,并导致患者管理的临床相关改变。