Can Pre-biopsy Second-Look Breast Ultrasound Affect Clinical Management? Experience From a Single Tertiary Hospital.

OBJECTIVES

Interpretation discrepancy is a major disadvantage of breast imaging. This study aimed to determine the clinical benefit of the pre-biopsy second-look breast ultrasound (US).

METHODS

Patients with suspicious breast masses referred to our tertiary hospital for US-guided breast biopsy were retrospectively reviewed between August 2017 and November 2019. Here, second-look assessments were performed by experienced specialized breast radiologists performing a bilateral breast US scan plus reviewing former imaging studies, and results were compared with the initial assessment. Interpretation changes in terms of biopsy recommendation and surgical management (i.e., lumpectomy to mastectomy) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 537 patients were enrolled in this study. Interpretation discrepancies occurred in 109 patients (20%; 95% CI, 17%-24%). Among them, there were 84 patients (16%; 95% CI, 13%-19%) whose masses were re-classified as BI-RADS 3 by the second-look US and underwent 2-year follow-up, showing 82 benign, 1 malignant, and 1 high-risk lesions. On the other hand, 16 patients (3%; 95% CI, 2%-5%) undertook biopsy at an additional site, identifying 10 new malignant lesions, 3 high-risk lesions, and 3 benign lesions, resulting in surgical management changes in 12 patients. In addition, nine (2%; 95% CI, 1%-3%) patients received discrepant disease ranges, which also altered surgical management. Overall, 21 patients (4%; 95% CI, 3%-6%) got their surgical management altered by the second-look US.

CONCLUSION

Pre-biopsy second-look assessment of breast US can reduce unnecessary biopsies in 16% of patients and alter surgical management in 4% of patients, suggesting it is a practical and valuable method for patient care improvement.