• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏康复转诊在医院出院时的性别和种族差异以及长期死亡率的差距。

Sex and Racial Disparities in Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral at Hospital Discharge and Gaps in Long-Term Mortality.

机构信息

Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

University of California, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 6;7(8):e008088. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008088.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.117.008088
PMID:29626153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6015394/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral is recommended for eligible patients, regardless of sex or race. It is unclear whether inequality in CR referral practices was associated with patients' long-term survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We linked the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines Coronary Artery Disease registry with Medicare claims data for 48 993 coronary artery disease patients from 365 hospitals across the United States between 2003 and 2009. We used generalized estimation equations to estimate the association between CR referral and mortality accounting for clustering within hospitals. Between 2003 and 2009, only 40% of eligible patients received CR referrals. Females were 12% less likely to receive CR referral compared with males. Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were 20%, 36%, and 50% less likely, respectively, to receive CR referral than white patients. CR referral was associated with 40% lower 3-year all-cause mortality. Women and minorities who received CR referral at hospital discharge had significantly lower mortality compared with those who did not (odds ratios=0.61 [95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.66] for women, 0.75 [95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.88] for black, 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.79] for Hispanic, and 0.63 [95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.85] for Asian patients). Seven percent of the black versus white mortality gap could potentially be reduced by equitable CR referral.

CONCLUSIONS

CR referral rates at hospital discharge remained low. Gaps in receiving CR referral at hospital discharge were large for women and minorities, and the mortality gap could potentially be reduced through elimination of inequality in CR referral.

摘要

背景

无论性别或种族如何,对于符合条件的患者,均推荐进行心脏康复(CR)转诊。目前尚不清楚 CR 转诊实践中的不平等是否与患者的长期生存有关。

方法和结果

我们将美国心脏协会 Get With The Guidelines 冠状动脉疾病注册库与美国 365 家医院 2003 年至 2009 年期间的 48993 例冠状动脉疾病患者的医疗保险索赔数据相关联。我们使用广义估计方程,根据医院内的聚类情况,估计 CR 转诊与死亡率之间的关联。在 2003 年至 2009 年期间,仅有 40%的符合条件的患者接受了 CR 转诊。与男性相比,女性接受 CR 转诊的可能性低 12%。黑种人、西班牙裔和亚裔患者接受 CR 转诊的可能性分别比白人低 20%、36%和 50%。CR 转诊与 3 年全因死亡率降低 40%相关。在出院时接受 CR 转诊的女性和少数族裔患者的死亡率明显低于未接受转诊的患者(女性的比值比=0.61 [95%置信区间,0.56-0.66],黑种人的比值比=0.75 [95%置信区间,0.63-0.88],西班牙裔的比值比=0.62 [95%置信区间,0.50-0.79],亚裔患者的比值比=0.63 [95%置信区间,0.46-0.85])。通过公平的 CR 转诊,黑种人和白人之间的 7%的死亡率差距可能会降低。

结论

出院时的 CR 转诊率仍然较低。女性和少数族裔在出院时接受 CR 转诊的差距较大,通过消除 CR 转诊中的不平等,死亡率差距可能会降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f70/6015394/fdebe221de60/JAH3-7-e008088-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f70/6015394/312339ef0b78/JAH3-7-e008088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f70/6015394/fdebe221de60/JAH3-7-e008088-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f70/6015394/312339ef0b78/JAH3-7-e008088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f70/6015394/fdebe221de60/JAH3-7-e008088-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex and Racial Disparities in Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral at Hospital Discharge and Gaps in Long-Term Mortality.心脏康复转诊在医院出院时的性别和种族差异以及长期死亡率的差距。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 6;7(8):e008088. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008088.
2
Patterns of Referral and Postdischarge Utilization of Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure: An Analysis From the GWTG-HF Registry.心力衰竭住院患者心脏康复转介和出院后利用模式:来自 GWTG-HF 登记处的分析。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;16(8):e010144. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010144. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, and Valve Surgery: Data From the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、冠状动脉旁路移植术和心脏瓣膜置换术后的心脏康复转诊:来自临床结局评估项目的数据。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003364.
4
Cardiac rehabilitation referral, attendance and mortality in women.女性心脏康复转诊、参与情况及死亡率
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Aug;22(8):979-86. doi: 10.1177/2047487314545279. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
5
Racial disparities in cardiac rehabilitation initiation and the effect on survival.心脏康复启动方面的种族差异及其对生存的影响。
PM R. 2014 Jun;6(6):486-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.11.016. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
6
Racial Differences in Long-Term Outcomes Among Older Survivors of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.老年人院内心脏骤停后长期结局的种族差异。
Circulation. 2018 Oct 16;138(16):1643-1650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033211.
7
Effect of an American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines program-based clinical pathway on referral and enrollment into cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction.一项基于美国心脏协会“遵循指南”项目的临床路径对急性心肌梗死后心脏康复转诊及登记的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Apr 15;101(8):1084-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.11.063. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
8
Gaps in referral to cardiac rehabilitation of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States.美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者转诊至心脏康复治疗的缺口。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 19;65(19):2079-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.063.
9
Discharge Hospice Referral and Lower 30-Day All-Cause Readmission in Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized for Heart Failure.医疗保险受益人心力衰竭住院患者的出院临终关怀转诊与降低30天全因再入院率
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 Jul;8(4):733-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002153. Epub 2015 May 27.
10
Hospital and Operator Variation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral and Participation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium.密歇根蓝十字蓝盾心血管联合会:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心脏康复转诊和参与的医院和运营商差异研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Nov;14(11):e008242. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008242. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Modern Era: Evidence, Equity, and Evolving Delivery Models Across the Cardiovascular Spectrum.现代心脏康复:心血管领域的证据、公平性及不断发展的服务模式
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 7;14(15):5573. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155573.
2
Age-associated changes in the heart: implications for COVID-19 therapies.心脏的年龄相关变化:对COVID-19治疗的影响。
Aging (Albany NY). 2025 May 13;17(5):1340-1367. doi: 10.18632/aging.206251.
3
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of cardiac rehabilitation referral among healthcare professionals in China: A mediation model.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends and Predictors of Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: Data From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.急性心肌梗死后参与心脏康复的趋势和预测因素:来自行为风险因素监测系统的数据。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Dec 29;7(1):e007664. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007664.
2
Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation Dose on Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis.心脏康复剂量对死亡率和发病率的影响:一项系统评价和Meta回归分析
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Nov;92(11):1644-1659. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
3
A systematic review of cardiac rehabilitation registries.
中国医疗保健专业人员心脏康复转诊的知识、态度和实践:一种中介模型。
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Apr 5;53:103064. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103064. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Referral to Outpatient Heart Failure Management at Hospital Discharge: A Get With The Guidelines Analysis.出院时门诊心力衰竭管理转诊中的种族和民族差异:一项遵循指南分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):e036900. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036900. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
5
Heart Failure in Black Populations: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment Disparities.黑人人群中的心力衰竭:流行病学、病理生理学及治疗差异
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02371-3.
6
Getting to the Heart of the Matter: Exploring the Intersection of Cardiovascular Disease, Sex and Race and How Exercise, and Gut Microbiota Influence these Relationships.直击问题核心:探索心血管疾病、性别与种族的交叉点,以及运动和肠道微生物群如何影响这些关系。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 20;26(2):26430. doi: 10.31083/RCM26430. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Long-term risks of cardiovascular-specific mortality among myeloproliferative neoplasms patients.骨髓增殖性肿瘤患者心血管特异性死亡的长期风险。
Ther Adv Hematol. 2024 Oct 28;15:20406207241290886. doi: 10.1177/20406207241290886. eCollection 2024.
8
Sex and gender specific pitfalls and challenges in cardiac rehabilitation: a working hypothesis towards better inclusivity in cardiac rehabilitation programmes.心脏康复中性别特异性的陷阱与挑战:关于提高心脏康复项目包容性的一个工作假设
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Sep 6;4(5):oeae071. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae071. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Myocardial Infarction Quality of Care and Outcomes in Asian Ethnic Groups in the United States.美国亚裔族群的心肌梗死治疗质量与结局。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Oct;17(10):e011097. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011097. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
10
Home based cardiac rehabilitation: A retrospective cohort analysis on all-cause mortality and hospital readmission rates across sexes and races.家庭心脏康复:一项关于全因死亡率及不同性别和种族患者再入院率的回顾性队列分析
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Jul 17;19:100708. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100708. eCollection 2024 Sep.
系统评价心脏康复注册研究。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Oct;24(15):1596-1609. doi: 10.1177/2047487317724576. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
4
Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value.观察性研究中的敏感性分析:引入 E 值。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):268-274. doi: 10.7326/M16-2607. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2017年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
6
Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From 20% to 70%: A Road Map From the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative.将心脏康复参与率从20%提高到70%:来自“百万心脏”心脏康复协作组织的路线图。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Feb;92(2):234-242. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies - The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS).急性血运重建和他汀类药物治疗时代心脏康复的预后效果:一项对随机和非随机研究的系统评价与荟萃分析——心脏康复结局研究(CROS)
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Dec;23(18):1914-1939. doi: 10.1177/2047487316671181. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
8
Evidence-Based Policy Making: Assessment of the American Heart Association's Strategic Policy Portfolio: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association.循证决策:美国心脏协会战略政策组合评估:美国心脏协会政策声明
Circulation. 2016 May 3;133(18):e615-53. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000410. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
9
Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复:Cochrane 系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jan 5;67(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044.
10
Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs Among Older Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后老年患者参与心脏康复计划的情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1700-2. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3819.