Irish Haemophilia Society, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK.
Haemophilia. 2018 Nov;24(6):873-879. doi: 10.1111/hae.13456. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
Growing budgetary demands have led to increased scrutiny of healthcare spending for rare diseases, leading to a unified goal within the haemophilia community to define objectively patient-centred value in haemophilia care.
To develop a patient-centred outcomes framework with global applicability for assessing value in haemophilia healthcare.
An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts convened to identify the range of patient impacts of haemophilia health care and organize these into a three-tiered, patient-centred outcomes framework based on Porter's model for assessing value.
In addition to measures common to other chronic diseases (eg survival and quality of life), Tier 1, health status achieved or retained, includes haemophilia-specific outcomes of bleeding frequency, musculoskeletal complications and life-threatening bleeds, as well as measures of function or activity. Tier 2, process of recovery, includes such outcomes as time to initial treatment, time to recovery and time missed at education/work; also included are disutility of care, measured by inhibitor development, pathogen transmission/infections, orthopaedic intervention and difficult venous access. Tier 3, sustainability of health, is measured by bleed avoidance, maintenance of productive lives and good health over time; potential long-term negative consequences include insufficient or inappropriate therapy and age-related complications. The applicability of the outcomes framework for different types of haemophilia healthcare interventions is described.
Haemophilia health care can affect multiple patient-centred outcomes across diverse patient types and healthcare systems. This framework organizes those outcomes for informing value-based decision making by multiple stakeholders and provides the basis for further refinement and development of a standardized outcomes set.
不断增长的预算需求导致对罕见病医疗支出的审查日益严格,这使得血友病界形成了一个统一的目标,即为血友病护理定义客观的以患者为中心的价值。
制定一个具有全球适用性的以患者为中心的血友病医疗保健价值评估结果框架。
召集了一个由国际多学科专家组成的小组,旨在确定血友病医疗对患者的一系列影响,并根据波特的评估价值模型将这些影响组织成一个三层的以患者为中心的结果框架。
除了与其他慢性疾病共同的措施(例如生存和生活质量)外,第 1 层,达到或保持的健康状况,包括血友病特有的出血频率、肌肉骨骼并发症和危及生命的出血等结果,以及功能或活动的衡量标准。第 2 层,恢复过程,包括初始治疗时间、恢复时间和教育/工作缺勤时间等结果;还包括护理的不便利性,通过抑制剂的发展、病原体传播/感染、矫形干预和静脉穿刺困难来衡量。第 3 层,健康的可持续性,通过避免出血、保持生产性生活和随着时间的推移保持良好的健康来衡量;潜在的长期负面后果包括治疗不足或不当以及与年龄相关的并发症。还描述了该结果框架在不同类型的血友病医疗保健干预中的适用性。
血友病医疗保健可以影响不同类型的患者和医疗体系中的多个以患者为中心的结果。该框架组织了这些结果,以便为多方利益相关者提供基于价值的决策提供信息,并为进一步完善和制定标准化结果集奠定基础。