Suppr超能文献

天然复杂性:与植物性膳食补充剂安全性评估相关的观点和挑战。

Naturally complex: Perspectives and challenges associated with Botanical Dietary Supplement Safety assessment.

机构信息

Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; ICF International, Inc., Durham, NC, USA.

Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Aug;118:963-971. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

Abstract

Due to the extensive use of botanical dietary supplements by consumers in the United States, there is a need for appropriate research and data to support safety assessments. Complexity and variability, both natural and introduced, of botanical dietary supplements make research on these products difficult. Botanical dietary supplements are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), as amended by the 1994 Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA). They are regulated as a category of food, which differs from the regulation of pharmaceutical products. Both manufacturers and the FDA are faced with the challenge of determining the best approaches for evaluating and monitoring the safety of botanical products. High quality botanicals research requires accurate identification and characterization of the material being studied. Inconsistent results in efficacy studies of botanical dietary supplements have led to efforts to improve the rigor and reproducibility of research in the field. Addressing the challenges associated with botanical dietary supplement safety is a global effort requiring coordination between numerous stakeholders, including researchers, suppliers, manufacturers, and regulators, all of whom play a role in ensuring that high quality products are available on the market.

摘要

由于美国消费者广泛使用植物性膳食补充剂,因此需要进行适当的研究和数据支持安全性评估。植物性膳食补充剂的复杂性和可变性,无论是天然的还是引入的,都使得对这些产品的研究变得困难。植物性膳食补充剂受美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)根据 1994 年《膳食补充剂健康与教育法案》(DSHEA)修订的《联邦食品、药品和化妆品法案》(FD&C 法案)监管。它们被归为食品类别进行监管,与药品的监管方式不同。制造商和 FDA 都面临着确定评估和监测植物产品安全性的最佳方法的挑战。高质量的植物研究需要准确识别和描述正在研究的材料。植物性膳食补充剂功效研究中的不一致结果导致人们努力提高该领域研究的严谨性和可重复性。解决与植物性膳食补充剂安全性相关的挑战是一项全球性努力,需要众多利益相关者之间的协调,包括研究人员、供应商、制造商和监管机构,他们都在确保市场上提供高质量的产品方面发挥作用。

相似文献

1
Naturally complex: Perspectives and challenges associated with Botanical Dietary Supplement Safety assessment.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Aug;118:963-971. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
2
Overview of regulation of dietary supplements in the USA and issues of adulteration with phenethylamines (PEAs).
Drug Test Anal. 2017 Mar;9(3):500-517. doi: 10.1002/dta.1980. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
4
Pharmacopeial Standards for the Quality Control of Botanical Dietary Supplements in the United States.
J Diet Suppl. 2023;20(3):485-504. doi: 10.1080/19390211.2021.1990171. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
5
FDA regulation of dietary supplements and requirements regarding adverse event reporting.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Feb;87(2):239-44. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.263. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
9
Current regulatory guidelines and resources to support research of dietary supplements in the United States.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(2):298-309. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1524364. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
10
The safety and regulation of natural products used as foods and food ingredients.
Toxicol Sci. 2011 Oct;123(2):333-48. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr198. Epub 2011 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

3
Combined Exposures and Mixtures Research: An Enduring NIEHS Priority.
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Jul;132(7):75001. doi: 10.1289/EHP14340. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
4
Harnessing controlled-environment systems for enhanced production of medicinal plants.
J Exp Bot. 2025 Jan 1;76(1):76-93. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae248.
6
Validation of a Toll-like Receptor (TLR)2/TLR1 Activation Assay for Biological Standardization of / Immune-Enhancing Potency.
J Diet Suppl. 2024;21(3):281-293. doi: 10.1080/19390211.2023.2263566. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
7
Horizon scan of DNA-based methods for quality control and monitoring of herbal preparations.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 3;14:1179099. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1179099. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The Regulatory Framework Across International Jurisdictions for Risks Associated with Consumption of Botanical Food Supplements.
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2017 Sep;16(5):821-834. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12289. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
2
Adulteration of Dietary Supplements by the Illegal Addition of Synthetic Drugs: A Review.
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016 Jan;15(1):43-62. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12173. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
Finding the bad actor: Challenges in identifying toxic constituents in botanical dietary supplements.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Feb;124:431-438. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.12.026. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
How similar is similar enough? A sufficient similarity case study with Ginkgo biloba extract.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Aug;118:328-339. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 9.
8
CYP3A4 inhibition by and its major components in human recombinant enzyme, differentiated human hepatoma HuH-7 and HepaRG cells.
Toxicol Rep. 2015 Mar 23;2:530-534. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.03.006. eCollection 2015.
9
Harnessing Plant Biodiversity for the Discovery of Novel Anticancer Drugs Targeting Microtubules.
Front Plant Sci. 2017 May 4;8:720. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00720. eCollection 2017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验