Suppr超能文献

社交媒体与新发传染病疫情:文献系统综述。

Social media and outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases: A systematic review of literature.

机构信息

Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.

Independent Scholar, San Jose, California.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2018 Sep;46(9):962-972. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The public often turn to social media for information during emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) outbreaks. This study identified the major approaches and assessed the rigors in published research articles on EIDs and social media.

METHODS

We searched 5 databases for published journal articles on EIDs and social media. We then evaluated these articles in terms of EIDs studied, social media examined, theoretical frameworks, methodologic approaches, and research findings.

RESULTS

Thirty articles were included in the analysis (published between January 1, 2010, and March 1, 2016). EIDs that received most scholarly attention were H1N1 (or swine flu, n = 15), Ebola virus (n = 10), and H7N9 (or avian flu/bird flu, n = 2). Twitter was the most often studied social media (n = 17), followed by YouTube (n = 6), Facebook (n = 6), and blogs (n = 6). Three major approaches in this area of inquiry are identified: (1) assessment of the public's interest in and responses to EIDs, (2) examination of organizations' use of social media in communicating EIDs, and (3) evaluation of the accuracy of EID-related medical information on social media.

CONCLUSIONS

Although academic studies of EID communication on social media are on the rise, they still suffer from a lack of theorization and a need for more methodologic rigor.

摘要

背景

公众在新发传染病(EID)爆发期间经常转向社交媒体获取信息。本研究确定了主要方法,并评估了 EID 和社交媒体方面已发表研究文章的严谨性。

方法

我们在 5 个数据库中搜索了关于 EID 和社交媒体的已发表期刊文章。然后,我们从研究的 EID、检查的社交媒体、理论框架、方法学方法和研究结果等方面对这些文章进行了评估。

结果

共纳入 30 篇文章进行分析(发表于 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 3 月 1 日)。受到最多关注的 EID 是 H1N1(或猪流感,n=15)、埃博拉病毒(n=10)和 H7N9(或禽流感/鸟流感,n=2)。Twitter 是研究最多的社交媒体(n=17),其次是 YouTube(n=6)、Facebook(n=6)和博客(n=6)。该领域的三个主要方法是:(1)评估公众对 EID 的兴趣和反应,(2)研究组织在传播 EID 方面使用社交媒体,(3)评估社交媒体上 EID 相关医疗信息的准确性。

结论

尽管关于社交媒体上 EID 传播的学术研究正在增加,但它们仍然缺乏理论化,需要更加严谨的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde6/7115293/9c5528618c2e/ymic4743-fig-0001_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验