• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术联合与不联合经阴道尿道中段吊带术:2年随访尿症状及生活质量

Robotic-assisted Sacrocolpopexy with versus without Concomitant Midurethral Sling: A 2-year Follow-up of Urinary Symptoms and Quality of Life.

作者信息

Schachar Jeffrey S, Williams Kathryn S, Winkler Harvey A

机构信息

Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health System, Great Neck, New York, USA.

Division of Urogynecology, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health System, Great Neck, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Midlife Health. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):26-31. doi: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_64_17.

DOI:10.4103/jmh.JMH_64_17
PMID:29628725
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5879844/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess long-term postoperative urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients after robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) with or without concomitant midurethral sling (MUS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional survey of patients comparing long-term postoperative urinary symptoms and QOL measurements in women who underwent RASC with or without MUS. We included all patients from 2011 to 2014 who had RASC with or without MUS. All patients had preoperative urodynamic testing (UDS). Patients who demonstrated stress UI on UDS underwent MUS at the time of RASC. Urinary symptoms and QOL were assessed through the validated Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) patient questionnaires.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients met inclusion criteria, 46 patients completed follow-up questionnaires, and were included in the final analysis. Average length of time to follow-up from surgery was 24 months (range: 6-36 months). A statistically significant difference in UDI-6 scores between the two groups (RASC vs. RASC + MUS) was observed. Median (25 and 75 percentiles) scores for UDI-6 were 22.92 (8.33 and 32.29, respectively) for the RASC group and 4.17 (0 and 13.54, respectively) for the RASC + MUS group ( = 0.0017). Median scores for IIQ-7 were 0 (0 and 29.73 for the 25 and 75 percentiles, respectively) for the RASC group and 0 (0 and 0, respectively) for the RASC + MUS group ( = 0.1691).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent RASC + MUS scored significantly lower on the UDI-6, indicating fewer urinary distress symptoms. Although not statistically significant, patients in the RASC + MUS group had lower IIQ-7 scores, indicating less negative impact on QOL, compared to the RASC-only group.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估接受机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术(RASC)加或不加伴发尿道中段吊带术(MUS)的患者术后长期尿失禁(UI)症状及生活质量(QOL)。

材料与方法

这是一项对患者的横断面调查,比较接受RASC加或不加MUS的女性术后长期泌尿系统症状及生活质量测量结果。我们纳入了2011年至2014年所有接受RASC加或不加MUS的患者。所有患者术前均进行了尿动力学检查(UDS)。在UDS中表现为压力性尿失禁的患者在RASC时接受了MUS。通过经过验证的尿失禁困扰量表-6(UDI-6)和尿失禁影响问卷-7(IIQ-7)患者问卷对泌尿系统症状和生活质量进行评估。

结果

68例患者符合纳入标准,46例患者完成随访问卷并纳入最终分析。手术至随访的平均时间为24个月(范围:6 - 36个月)。观察到两组(RASC组与RASC + MUS组)UDI-6评分存在统计学显著差异。RASC组UDI-6的中位数(第25和第75百分位数)评分分别为22.92(8.33和32.29),RASC + MUS组为4.17(0和13.54)(P = 0.0017)。RASC组IIQ-7的中位数评分为0(第25和第75百分位数分别为0和29.73),RASC + MUS组为0(分别为0和0)(P = 0.1691)。

结论

接受RASC + MUS的患者在UDI-6上得分显著更低,表明泌尿系统困扰症状更少。虽然无统计学显著差异,但与仅接受RASC组相比,RASC + MUS组患者的IIQ-7评分更低,表明对生活质量的负面影响更小。

相似文献

1
Robotic-assisted Sacrocolpopexy with versus without Concomitant Midurethral Sling: A 2-year Follow-up of Urinary Symptoms and Quality of Life.机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术联合与不联合经阴道尿道中段吊带术:2年随访尿症状及生活质量
J Midlife Health. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):26-31. doi: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_64_17.
2
[Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, with or without a midurethral sling, on lower urinary tract symptoms].[腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术(有无经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术)对下尿路症状的影响]
Prog Urol. 2016 Jun;26(7):401-8. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
3
Concurrent midurethral sling excision or lysis at the time of repeat sling for treatment of recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence.在重复吊带手术治疗复发性或持续性压力性尿失禁时同时进行中段尿道吊带切除或松解。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Feb;29(2):285-290. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3385-5. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
4
Incontinence outcomes after "second primary" compared to repeat midurethral sling for recurrent and persistent stress urinary incontinence.复发性和持续性压力性尿失禁患者,“二次原发性”手术与重复经尿道中段吊带术相比的尿失禁治疗效果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jan;32(1):75-80. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04447-6. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
Change in urinary storage symptoms following treatment for female stress urinary incontinence.女性压力性尿失禁治疗后膀胱储尿期症状的变化
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Aug;27(8):1169-74. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2951-6. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
Modified distal urethral polypropylene sling (canal transobturator tape) procedure: efficacy for persistent stress urinary incontinence after a conventional midurethral sling procedure.改良的尿道远端聚丙烯吊带(经闭孔尿道中段吊带)术:对传统的尿道中段吊带术后持续性压力性尿失禁的疗效。
Int Neurourol J. 2013 Mar;17(1):18-23. doi: 10.5213/inj.2013.17.1.18. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
7
Short-term results of stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without midurethral sling.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术联合或不联合中段尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的短期疗效。
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021 Jul;13(3):341-346. doi: 10.1111/luts.12373. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
8
Outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in women with mixed urinary incontinence.混合性尿失禁女性患者接受中段尿道吊带手术的治疗结果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May;26(5):715-20. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2580-x. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
9
Long-term patient satisfaction following cadaveric pubovaginal sling incontinence surgery using the UDI and IIQ-7 questionnaires.使用UDI和IIQ-7问卷评估尸体耻骨后阴道吊带术治疗尿失禁的长期患者满意度。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(2):185-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.20318.
10
Single-incision midurethral sling shows less pain and similar success rate in a short-term follow-up compared to the transobturator tape method in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.在治疗压力性尿失禁方面,与经闭孔吊带术相比,单切口尿道中段吊带术在短期随访中疼痛较轻,成功率相似。
Turk J Urol. 2019 Oct 25;46(1):63-68. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.19105. Print 2020 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Sacrocolpopexy with Autologous Fascia Lata: A Case Series.自体阔筋膜机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术:病例系列
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Feb 9;12(1):10-14. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_7_22. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
2
Psychological nursing approach on anxiety and depression of patients with severe urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy - a pilot study.前列腺癌根治术后重度尿失禁患者焦虑抑郁的心理护理干预——一项初步研究
J Int Med Res. 2019 Nov;47(11):5689-5701. doi: 10.1177/0300060519878014. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Burch Retropubic Urethropexy Compared With Midurethral Sling With Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.耻骨后尿道悬吊术与经阴道尿道中段吊带术联合骶棘韧带固定术的比较:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):828-35. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001651.
2
Tension-Free Vaginal Tape Failure After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy and Tension-Free Vaginal Tape for Concomitant Prolapse and Stress Incontinence.机器人骶骨阴道固定术联合无张力阴道吊带术治疗合并阴道脱垂和压力性尿失禁后无张力阴道吊带失败
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):244-8. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000196.
3
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
4
New onset stress urinary incontinence following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and its relation to anatomical outcomes.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术后新发压力性尿失禁及其与解剖学结果的关系。
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jul;26(7):1041-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2641-9. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
5
A meta-analysis of the performance of retropubic mid urethral slings versus transobturator mid urethral slings.耻骨后尿道中段吊带与经闭孔尿道中段吊带性能的荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.104. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
6
A prospective study of a single-incision sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy.机器人骶骨阴道固定术同期单切口吊带的前瞻性研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Nov;25(11):1541-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2432-8. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
7
Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis.女性压力性尿失禁的吊带手术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;211(1):71.e1-71.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.030. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
8
A model for predicting the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery.用于预测女性盆腔器官脱垂手术中新发压力性尿失禁风险的模型。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):279-287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000094.
9
Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.脱垂手术联合或不联合压力性尿失禁手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2014 Apr;121(5):537-47. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12509. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
10
Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.经腹式骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的长期疗效。
JAMA. 2013 May 15;309(19):2016-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4919.