Suppr超能文献

绘制美国本土的流域完整性图。

Mapping watershed integrity for the conterminous United States.

作者信息

Thornbrugh Darren J, Leibowitz Scott G, Hill Ryan A, Weber Marc H, Johnson Zachary C, Olsen Anthony R, Flotemersch Joseph E, Stoddard John L, Peck David V

机构信息

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Post-Doctoral Fellow c/o U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, 200 SW 35 St., Corvallis, OR 97333, USA.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, 200 SW 35 St., Corvallis, OR 97333 USA.

出版信息

Ecol Indic. 2018 Feb 1;85:1133-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.070.

Abstract

Watershed integrity is the capacity of a watershed to support and maintain the full range of ecological processes and functions essential to sustainability. Using information from EPA's StreamCat dataset, we calculated and mapped an Index of Watershed Integrity (IWI) for 2.6 million watersheds in the conterminous US with first-order approximations of relationships between stressors and six watershed functions: hydrologic regulation, regulation of water chemistry, sediment regulation, hydrologic connectivity, temperature regulation, and habitat provision. Results show high integrity in the western US, intermediate integrity in the southern and eastern US, and the lowest integrity in the temperate plains and lower Mississippi Valley. Correlation between the six functional components was high ( = 0.85-0.98). A related Index of Catchment Integrity (ICI) was developed using local drainages of individual stream segments (i.e., excluding upstream information). We evaluated the ability of the IWI and ICI to predict six continuous site-level indicators with regression analyses - three biological indicators and principal components derived from water quality, habitat, and combined water quality and habitat variables - using data from EPA's National Rivers and Streams Assessment. Relationships were highly significant, but the IWI only accounted for 1-12% of the variation in the four biological and habitat variables. The IWI accounted for over 25% of the variation in the water quality and combined principal components nationally, and 32-39% in the Northern and Southern Appalachians. We also used multinomial logistic regression to compare the IWI with the categorical forms of the three biological indicators. Results were consistent: we found positive associations but modest results. We compared how the IWI and ICI predicted the water quality PC relative to agricultural and urban land use. The IWI or ICI are the best predictors of the water quality PC for the CONUS and six of the nine ecoregions, but they only perform marginally better than agriculture in most instances. However, results suggest that agriculture would not be appropriate in all parts of the country, and the index is meant to be responsive to all stressors. The IWI in its present form (available through the StreamCat website; https://www.epa.gov/national-aquatic-resource-surveys/streamcat) could be useful for management efforts at multiple scales, especially when combined with information on site condition. The IWI could be improved by incorporating empirical or literature-derived relationships between functional components and stressors. However, limitations concerning the absence of data for certain stressors should be considered.

摘要

流域完整性是指一个流域支持和维持对可持续性至关重要的全方位生态过程和功能的能力。利用美国环境保护局(EPA)的StreamCat数据集信息,我们计算并绘制了美国本土260万个流域的流域完整性指数(IWI),并对压力源与六种流域功能(水文调节、水化学调节、泥沙调节、水文连通性、温度调节和栖息地提供)之间的关系进行了一阶近似。结果显示,美国西部的完整性较高,南部和东部的完整性中等,温带平原和密西西比河下游流域的完整性最低。六个功能组件之间的相关性很高(= 0.85 - 0.98)。利用各个溪流段的局部排水区域(即不包括上游信息)开发了一个相关的集水区完整性指数(ICI)。我们使用EPA的《国家河流和溪流评估》数据,通过回归分析评估了IWI和ICI预测六个连续站点级指标的能力,这六个指标包括三个生物指标以及从水质、栖息地以及水质与栖息地综合变量中得出的主成分。关系非常显著,但IWI仅解释了四个生物和栖息地变量中1% - 12%的变异。IWI解释了全国水质和综合主成分变异的25%以上,在北阿巴拉契亚和南阿巴拉契亚地区则为32% - 39%。我们还使用多项逻辑回归将IWI与三种生物指标的分类形式进行比较。结果一致:我们发现了正相关关系,但效果一般。我们比较了IWI和ICI相对于农业和城市土地利用对水质主成分的预测情况。对于美国大陆和九个生态区域中的六个,IWI或ICI是水质主成分的最佳预测指标,但在大多数情况下,它们仅比农业略好。然而,结果表明农业并不适合该国所有地区,该指数旨在对所有压力源做出响应。当前形式的IWI(可通过StreamCat网站获取;https://www.epa.gov/national-aquatic-resource-surveys/streamcat)可用于多个尺度的管理工作,特别是与现场状况信息相结合时。通过纳入功能组件与压力源之间的经验或文献得出的关系,可以改进IWI。然而,应考虑某些压力源数据缺失的局限性。

相似文献

1
Mapping watershed integrity for the conterminous United States.绘制美国本土的流域完整性图。
Ecol Indic. 2018 Feb 1;85:1133-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.070.
2
Revising the index of watershed integrity national maps.修订国家流域完整性指标图。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 2):2615-2630. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.112. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

6
PiSCES: Pi(scine) stream community estimation system.PiSCES:Pi(鱼类)溪流群落估计系统。
Environ Model Softw. 2020 May 1;127. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104703.

本文引用的文献

4
Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines.全球生物多样性:近期衰退的指标。
Science. 2010 May 28;328(5982):1164-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1187512. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
7
Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.淡水生物多样性:重要性、威胁、现状及保护挑战
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 May;81(2):163-82. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950. Epub 2005 Dec 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验