Son Charles, Stewart Adam, Ward John, Farrar Kimary
Texas Chiropractic College, Pasadena, Texas.
Department of Foundational Sciences, Texas Chiropractic College, Pasadena, Texas.
J Chiropr Med. 2018 Mar;17(1):7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.10.007. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of completing a study comparing the impact of lower body strength training to proprioceptive exercises on vertical jump capacity.
Thirty-nine college students (age 27.9 ± 6.4 y, height 1.69 ± 0.10 m, body mass 73.4 ± 15.9 kg: mean ± standard deviation) underwent baseline and post-testing of their vertical jump capacity using a Vertical Challenger and VICON motion analysis system. Participants were randomly assigned to 3 interventional groups between testing sessions: (1) lower body strength training, (2) lower body proprioceptive training, and (3) a no training control. Group 1 underwent supervised exercises 3 days a week at 2 sets of 12 repetitions of squats, seated knee extensions, standing knee flexions, and standing calf raises at approximately 25% of their body weight. Group 2 participants engaged in 4 supervised proprioceptive exercise stations 3 days a week involving BOSU ball stance, Rocker board, Bodyblade, and 1-legged stance exercises at 4 minutes per station. A between-within repeated-measures analysis of variance using between-participants factor "group" and within-participants factor "time" (baseline and post-test) was used to analyze data.
Analysis of group × time indicated a small positive improvement in overall group performance for jump height at post-test, (2,36) = 5.527, = .008, = 0.36. However, post hoc testing identified no statistically significant difference between groups for dependent variables.
This study determined that it was feasible to complete a study to compare 2 groups, but more than 1 week would be required to observe differences between lower body weight training and lower body proprioceptive training on vertical jump.
本研究旨在测试完成一项比较下肢力量训练与本体感觉训练对垂直跳跃能力影响的研究的可行性。
39名大学生(年龄27.9±6.4岁,身高1.69±0.10米,体重73.4±15.9千克:均值±标准差)使用垂直挑战仪和VICON运动分析系统进行垂直跳跃能力的基线测试和测试后评估。在测试期间,参与者被随机分配到3个干预组:(1)下肢力量训练组,(2)下肢本体感觉训练组,(3)无训练对照组。第1组每周进行3天的监督训练,包括2组,每组12次重复的深蹲、坐姿膝关节伸展、站立膝关节屈曲和站立提踵,重量约为其体重的25%。第2组参与者每周进行3天,在4个监督本体感觉训练站进行训练,包括BOSU球站立姿势、摇板、Bodyblade和单腿站立练习,每个训练站4分钟。使用包含组间因素“组”和组内因素“时间”(基线和测试后)的重复测量方差分析来分析数据。
组×时间分析表明,测试后整体组的跳跃高度表现有小幅正向改善,F(2,36)=5.527,p=.008,η²=0.36。然而,事后检验发现各独立变量在组间无统计学显著差异。
本研究确定完成一项比较两组的研究是可行的,但需要超过1周的时间来观察下肢重量训练和下肢本体感觉训练对垂直跳跃的差异。