Bowen Meredith T, Rebello Leticia C, Bouslama Mehdi, Haussen Diogo C, Grossberg Jonathan A, Bianchi Nicolas A, Belagaje Samir, Anderson Aaron, Frankel Michael R, Nogueira Raul G
Department of Neurology, Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Interv Neurol. 2018 Feb;7(1-2):91-98. doi: 10.1159/000481205. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
The minimal stroke severity justifying endovascular intervention remains elusive. However, a significant proportion of patients presenting with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) and mild symptoms go untreated and face poor outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with LVOS and low symptom scores (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≤8) undergoing endovascular therapy (ET).
We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected ET database between September 2010 and March 2016. Endovascularly treated patients with LVOS and a baseline NIHSS score ≤8 were included. Baseline patient characteristics, procedural details, and outcome parameters were collected. Efficacy outcomes were the rate of good outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) and of successful reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] score 2b-3). Safety was assessed by the rate of parenchymal hematoma (parenchymal hematoma type 1 [PH-1] and parenchymal hematoma type 2 [PH-2]) and 90-day mortality. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of good clinical outcomes.
A total of 935 patients were considered; 72 patients with an NIHSS score ≤8 were included. Median [IQR] age was 61.5 years [56.2-73.0]; 39 patients (54%) were men. Mean (SD) baseline NIHSS score, computed tomography perfusion core volume, and ASPECTS were 6.3 (1.5), 7.5 mL (16.1), and 8.5 (1.3), respectively. Twenty-eight patients (39%) received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Occlusions locations were as follows: 29 (40%) proximal MCA-M1, 20 (28%) MCA-M2, 6 (8%) ICA terminus, and 9 (13%) vertebrobasilar. Tandem occlusion was documented in 7 patients (10%). Sixty-seven patients (93%) achieved successful reperfusion (mTICI score 2b-3); 52 (72%) had good 90-day outcomes. Mean final infarct volume was 32.2 ± 59.9 mL. Parenchymal hematoma occurred in 4 patients (6%). Ninety-day mortality was 10% ( = 7). Logistic regression showed that only successful reperfusion (OR 27.7, 95% CI 1.1-655.5, = 0.04) was an independent predictor of good outcomes.
Our findings demonstrate that ET is safe and feasible for LVOS patients presenting with mild clinical syndromes. Future controlled studies are warranted.
对于血管内介入治疗而言,最小的卒中严重程度标准仍不明确。然而,相当一部分表现为大血管闭塞性卒中(LVOS)且症状轻微的患者未得到治疗,预后较差。我们旨在评估接受血管内治疗(ET)的LVOS且症状评分较低(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表[NIHSS]评分≤8)患者的临床结局。
我们对2010年9月至2016年3月前瞻性收集的ET数据库进行了回顾性分析。纳入接受血管内治疗的LVOS且基线NIHSS评分≤8的患者。收集患者的基线特征、手术细节和结局参数。疗效结局为良好结局率(90天改良Rankin量表评分0 - 2)和成功再灌注率(改良脑梗死治疗[mTICI]评分2b - 3)。通过实质血肿发生率(1型实质血肿[PH - 1]和2型实质血肿[PH - 2])和90天死亡率评估安全性。采用逻辑回归确定良好临床结局的预测因素。
共纳入935例患者;其中72例NIHSS评分≤8的患者被纳入分析。年龄中位数[四分位间距]为61.5岁[56.2 - 73.0];39例(54%)为男性。平均(标准差)基线NIHSS评分、计算机断层扫描灌注核心体积和ASPECTS分别为6.3(1.5)、7.5 mL(16.1)和8.5(1.3)。28例(39%)患者接受了静脉注射组织纤溶酶原激活剂。闭塞部位如下:29例(40%)为大脑中动脉M1段近端,20例(28%)为大脑中动脉M2段,6例(8%)为颈内动脉末端,9例(13%)为椎基底动脉。7例(10%)记录为串联闭塞。67例(93%)患者实现了成功再灌注(mTICI评分2b - 3);52例(72%)患者90天预后良好。平均最终梗死体积为32.2±59.9 mL。4例(6%)患者发生实质血肿。90天死亡率为10%(n = 7)。逻辑回归显示,只有成功再灌注(比值比27.7,95%置信区间1.1 - 655.5,P = 0.04)是良好结局的独立预测因素。
我们的研究结果表明,对于表现为轻度临床综合征的LVOS患者,ET是安全可行的。未来有必要进行对照研究。