Suppr超能文献

在过敏患者中,与免疫CAP法相比,免疫印迹法检测特异性IgE的准确性。

Accuracy of immunoblotting assay for detection of specific IgE compared with ImmunoCAP in allergic patients.

作者信息

Shoormasti Raheleh Shokouhi, Fazlollahi Mohammad Reza, Kazemnejad Anoshirvan, Movahedi Masoud, Tayebi Behnoosh, Yazdanyar Zahra, Azadi Zakieh, Pourpak Zahra, Moin Mostafa

机构信息

Ph.D. Student, Immunology, Asthma and Allergy Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

MD., Allergist and Clinical Immunologist, Assistant Professor, Immunology, Asthma and Allergy Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Electron Physician. 2018 Feb 25;10(2):6327-6332. doi: 10.19082/6327. eCollection 2018 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Standardized techniques help us to better diagnosis and follow up of allergic diseases. In this study, we determined the sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity of an Immunoblotting test compared to ImmunoCAP as the reference in vitro test for detection of specific IgE in allergic patients.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, specific IgE level was determined in patients with allergic symptoms who referred to the Immunology, Asthma and Allergy Research Institute, Tehran, Iran from 2010-2016, by two techniques. Eleven different allergens (six aeroallergens and five food allergens) were determined, and 303 specific IgE tests were performed for the patients by each method. The Immunoblotting test is a multiplex assay on a nitrocellulose membrane coated with 20 selected allergens. ImmunoCAP is considered as the reference method for determination of in vitro specific IgE. Its principle is an automated sandwich immunoassay, and allergens were bound to the solid phase, covalently. Finally, the fluorescence of elute was determined. Specific IgE more than 0.35 KU/L was considered as a positive test. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, kappa coefficient, positive and negative likelihood ratio (+/- LR), and correlation coefficient (calculated with Spearman test) between two tests were determined using statistical analysis (SPSS software, version 18).

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty five patients entered this study. The median age of the patients was 3.75 years with the males constituting 54.8% of the population. The most common cheif complaints were respiratory (51.6%), skin (41.8%) and gastrointestinal (27.9%) symptoms, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, +LR and -LR were 83%, 97%, 92%, 27.66 and 0.17, respectively. The kappa coefficient of the immunoblotting test was 0.81 compared to the reference technique. The correlation coefficient for positive tests between the two methods was 0.71 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Regarding the presence of 20 allergens in a RIDA allergy panel and according to our findings, this immunoblotting test with high sensitivity could be used as a fast and cost-efficient screening test. However, ImmunoCAP is recommended when the accurate level of specific IgE is required. ImmunoCAP findings are particularly helpful for immunotherapy and the elimination diet.

摘要

背景与目的

标准化技术有助于我们更好地诊断和随访过敏性疾病。在本研究中,我们将免疫印迹试验与免疫捕获法(ImmunoCAP)进行比较,以确定免疫印迹试验在检测过敏性患者特异性IgE时的敏感性、准确性和特异性,免疫捕获法作为体外检测的参考方法。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,采用两种技术对2010年至2016年转诊至伊朗德黑兰免疫、哮喘和过敏研究所的有过敏症状患者的特异性IgE水平进行测定。测定了11种不同的变应原(6种气传变应原和5种食物变应原),并对每位患者每种方法进行303次特异性IgE检测。免疫印迹试验是在涂有20种选定变应原的硝酸纤维素膜上进行的多重分析。免疫捕获法被视为测定体外特异性IgE的参考方法。其原理是自动夹心免疫测定法,变应原共价结合到固相上。最后,测定洗脱液的荧光。特异性IgE超过0.35 KU/L被视为阳性检测。使用统计分析(SPSS软件,版本18)确定两种检测方法之间的敏感性、特异性、准确性、kappa系数、阳性和阴性似然比(+/- LR)以及相关系数(用Spearman检验计算)。

结果

135名患者进入本研究。患者的中位年龄为3.75岁,男性占人群的54.8%。最常见的主要症状分别为呼吸道症状(51.6%)、皮肤症状(41.8%)和胃肠道症状(27.9%)。敏感性、特异性、准确性、+LR和-LR分别为83%、97%、92%、27.66和0.17。与参考技术相比,免疫印迹试验的kappa系数为0.81。两种方法之间阳性检测的相关系数为0.71(p<0.001)。

结论

鉴于RIDA过敏检测板中存在20种变应原,根据我们的研究结果,这种具有高敏感性的免疫印迹试验可作为一种快速且经济高效的筛查试验。然而,当需要特异性IgE的准确水平时,建议使用免疫捕获法。免疫捕获法的结果对免疫治疗和排除饮食特别有帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3959/5878026/f38402ac1d63/EPJ-10-6327-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验