Suppr超能文献

免疫捕获法检测与AdvanSure™ AlloScreen高级多重特异性IgE检测法的比较。

Comparison of the ImmunoCAP Assay and AdvanSure™ AlloScreen Advanced Multiplex Specific IgE Detection Assay.

作者信息

Park Kyung Hee, Lee Jongsun, Lee Sang Chul, Son Young Woong, Sim Da Woon, Lee Jae Hyun, Park Jung Won

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Institute of Allergy, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2017 Jul;58(4):786-792. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.786.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The AdvanSure™ AlloScreen assay is an advanced multiplex test that allows for simultaneous detection of specific IgE (sIgE) against multiple allergens. For precise identification of causative allergens in allergic patients, we compared this new multiplex sIgE assay with the ImmunoCAP assay, which is currently the gold-standard method for sIgE detection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum samples from 218 Korean allergic disease patients were used to compare the ImmunoCAP and AlloScreen assays with respect to the following 13 allergens: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, cat and dog dander, Alternaria, birch, oak, ragweed, mugwort, rye grass, and food allergens (egg white, cow's milk, peanuts).

RESULTS

A total of 957 paired tests using the 13 allergens were compared. The total agreement ratio ranged from 0.74 (oak) to 0.97 (Alternaria). With respect to class association analyses, the gamma index ranged from 0.819 (rye grass) to 0.990 (Alternaria). The intra-class correlation coefficients for house dust mites, cat and dog dander, Alternaria, birch, ragweed, egg white, cow's milk, and peanut sIgE titers were >0.8.

CONCLUSION

The AlloScreen and ImmunoCAP assays exhibited similar diagnostic performance. However, due to methodological differences between the two systems, careful interpretation of their results is needed in clinical applications.

摘要

目的

AdvanSure™ AlloScreen检测是一种先进的多重检测方法,可同时检测针对多种过敏原的特异性IgE(sIgE)。为了准确鉴定过敏患者的致病过敏原,我们将这种新的多重sIgE检测方法与ImmunoCAP检测方法进行了比较,ImmunoCAP检测方法是目前sIgE检测的金标准方法。

材料与方法

使用218例韩国过敏性疾病患者的血清样本,就以下13种过敏原比较ImmunoCAP和AlloScreen检测方法:屋尘螨、粉尘螨、猫和狗皮屑、链格孢属、桦树、橡树、豚草、艾蒿、黑麦草以及食物过敏原(蛋清、牛奶、花生)。

结果

共比较了使用这13种过敏原的957对检测结果。总体一致率范围为0.74(橡树)至0.97(链格孢属)。关于类别关联分析,伽马指数范围为0.819(黑麦草)至0.990(链格孢属)。屋尘螨、猫和狗皮屑、链格孢属、桦树、豚草、蛋清、牛奶和花生sIgE滴度的组内相关系数>0.8。

结论

AlloScreen和ImmunoCAP检测方法表现出相似的诊断性能。然而,由于两种系统之间的方法学差异,在临床应用中需要仔细解读它们的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7df6/5447110/dad5494d0561/ymj-58-786-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验